| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,32 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Court legitimacy high – new court is making change.===== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+Wolf: Wolf, Richard Contributor, USA Today “Supreme Court’s chief justice seeks faster, fairer, more efficient system.” USA Today. December 2015. RP |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+WASHINGTON — Supreme Court |
|
6 |
+AND |
|
7 |
+world," he said. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+====The Supreme Court has consistently and decisively ruled in favor of qualified immunity – plan goes against that.==== |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+McCombs and Thornton: Katelyn McCombs and James Thornton Attorneys, Cranfill Sumner and Hartzog “Supreme Court Broadens Protection of Qualified Immunity to Police Officers in Excessive Force Cases.” Cranfill Sumner and Hartzog. March 2016. RP |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+Police officers are |
|
14 |
+AND |
|
15 |
+plausibly be applied. |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+====Overruling precedent will destroy court legitimacy and the rule of law==== |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+Gerhardt, 06 (Michael, professor of law at UNC, 90 Minn. L. Rev. 1204, “Super Precedent”, May, lexis) |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+Chief Justice Roberts |
|
22 |
+AND |
|
23 |
+left in tact. |
|
24 |
+ |
|
25 |
+====Trump will overreach and won’t have judicial checks.==== |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+ |
|
28 |
+Kagan writes: Kagan, Robert. Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution “Would Checks and Balances Stop Trump? Don’t Bet on It.” The Washington Post, June 16, 2016. CH |
|
29 |
+ |
|
30 |
+Will the Republican |
|
31 |
+AND |
|
32 |
+ ever, they do. |