Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[68]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[68]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,52 +1,0 @@
1		-I negate and value A Just State, meaning one that treats people as they deserve.
2		-
3		-Humans differ from objects in their ability to reason.
4		-Scanlon 1: Scanlon, Thomas Michael. Alford Professor of Natural Religion, Moral Philosophy, and Civil Polity, Harvard University What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998. CH
5		-
6		-A rational creature is,
7		-AND
8		- worth acting on.
9		-
10		-Respecting others’ rational agency requires acting in ways they’d find justifiable.
11		-Scanlon 2: Scanlon, Thomas Michael. Alford Professor of Natural Religion, Moral Philosophy, and Civil Polity, Harvard University. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998. CH
12		-
13		-Still, someone might
14		-AND
15		-valid moral claims.”
16		-
17		-Thus, the standard is Governing through Principles of Reasonable Rejectability. Governing through principles of reasonable rejectability means creating laws no one could reasonably reject.
18		-
19		-We base actions’ rejectability on how much they burden people; I can’t reasonably reject a law if the alternative is a much larger burden on others.
20		-Darwall writes: Darwall, Stephen. Professor of Philosophy, Yale University “Moral Discourse and Practice: Some Philosophical Approaches.” New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. EE
21		-The contractualist account
22		-
23		-AND
24		-in the paper.
25		-
26		-My thesis and sole contention is that no actor should face impossible burdens. By holding police to unrealistic standards, affirming creates conditions that both they and the public would reasonably reject.
27		-
28		-1 Unlike civilians, police face life-threatening decisions each day.
29		-McGuinness shows: McGuinness, J. Michael. Civil Rights Attorney “Deadly Force: The Rights of Suspects and Police Officers.” The Champion, May 2015. RP
30		-The streets of
31		-AND
32		-overlapping legal principles.
33		-
34		-Thus, police would reasonably reject limits on QI because those would deter them from doing their job.
35		-King: King, Andrew. Author, Mimesis Law “Keep Qualified Immunity...For Now.” Mimesis Law, July 2016. RP
36		-
37		-
38		-If you want
39		-
40		-AND
41		-is a solution.
42		-
43		-2 The public would reasonably reject a world that deters officers from policing.
44		-
45		-Capps shows: Capps, Kristin. Contributor, City Labs “Poll: Police Are Still Incredibly Popular.” City Lab, January 2015. RP
46		-
47		-
48		-New Yorkers aren't
49		-
50		-
51		-AND
52		- of 4 or 5).

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-11-06 16:26:15.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Mark Ahlstrom, Daniel Lumpee

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Valley EM

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-41

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Harrison Piliero Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-NOVDEC - Contractualism NC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Apple Valley RR