Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[67]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[67]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,27 +1,0 @@
1		-====A Interpretation: The Aff must defend implementation of a policy limiting qualified immunity====
2		-
3		-====‘Resolved’ denotes a proposal to be enacted by law====
4		-
5		-Words and Phrases 64 Permanent Edition “Resolved.”. 1964
6		-
7		-Definition of the
8		-AND
9		-establish by law”.
10		-
11		-====B Violation====
12		-
13		-====C Net Benefits====
14		-
15		-
16		-====1 Ground – not defending implementation means that most disads don’t apply – I lose elections, court clog, over-deterrence, and more====
17		-
18		-====2 Real World – discussion of policy is key to gain change====
19		-
20		-Coverstone writes: COVERSTONE Dir of Debate @ Montgomery Bell Academy 2k6 Alan-former debater @ Wake, MBA = private prep school in Nashville; “Acting on Activism”; DEBATER’S RESEARCH GUIDE (DRG), National Service Topic;
21		-
22		-The power to
23		-AND
24		-effective political activism
25		-
26		-====3 Limits – they can defend anything in the context of it being a good idea====
27		-====D T is a voting issue====

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-11-05 16:56:25.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Nick Smith

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Lake Highland RS

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-40

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-6

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Harrison Piliero Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-NOVDEC - Implementation T

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Apple Valley