| ... |
... |
@@ -1,28
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-====Their use of Foucault is anti-women – 2 reasons==== |
| 2 |
|
-====1. Foucault’s omission of women in his analysis of power perpetuates patriarchy===== |
| 3 |
|
-Featherstone |
| 4 |
|
-A subtlety exists |
| 5 |
|
-AND |
| 6 |
|
- creates new oppressions. |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-====2. Foucault’s focus on the masculine gender denies women power to resist power – rape becomes justified in an attempt to present objective relationships of power.===== |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-Johnson ‘04 |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
-Some feminist scholars |
| 14 |
|
-AND |
| 15 |
|
- a form of |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
- |
| 18 |
|
- |
| 19 |
|
- |
| 20 |
|
- |
| 21 |
|
- |
| 22 |
|
-====Hold debaters accountable for their discourse—you are an educator and this is a teachable moment—if you endorse her speech act as a 1ac, endorse all of it.===== |
| 23 |
|
- |
| 24 |
|
-Vincent 13 – (Christopher Debate Coach, former college NDT debater “Re-Conceptualizing Our Performances: Accountability In Lincoln Douglas Debate” http://victorybriefs.com/vbd/2013/10/re-conceptualizing-our-performances-accountability-in-lincoln-douglas-debate) |
| 25 |
|
- |
| 26 |
|
-Charles Mills argues |
| 27 |
|
-AND |
| 28 |
|
- community could have. |