Changes for page Harrison Piliero Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:35
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[48]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-11-13 02:39:22. 4721 +2016-11-13 02:39:22.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[80]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,15 @@ 1 +====A Interpretation: The Aff may not specify a particular method of limiting qualified immunity==== 2 +====B Violation==== 3 +====C Net Benefits==== 4 + 5 +====1 Limits – they allow way too many Affs. People can specify any way to limit it – there could be a sliding scale, repealing the “clearly established” element, a full out prohibition, and more. Further, they can specify down to ways of police being punished which means even more Affs.==== 6 + 7 +Bernick writes: Bernick, Evan. Contributor, Foundation for Economic Education “To Hold Police Accountable, Don’t Give Them Immunity.” Foundation for Economic Education, April 2015. RP 8 + 9 +There are a 10 +AND 11 +of constitutional rights. 12 + 13 +====2 Ground – spec gives them the ability to solve most disads – arguments like court clog or overdeterence obviously wouldn’t link to an Aff that defends a specific enforcement mechanism, like sliding scale – nor would a relations argument like politics link to a specific method==== 14 + 15 +====D Theory is a voting issue==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-13 02:39:24.882 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Big Wes, Paul Zhou, Kathy Wang - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Newark Science BA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +48 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quarters - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harrison Piliero Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NOVDEC - Subsets Theory - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Scarsdale Invitational