Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[5]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[5]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,23 +1,0 @@
1		-A Interpretation: The Aff may not defend a ban on nuclear weapons – they may only defend a ban on nuclear power
2		-Nuclear power isn’t the same as nuclear weaponry – international treaties prove
3		-Higgin: Higgin, Diana Contributor, CND “The links between nuclear power and nuclear weapons.” CND, April 2006. RP
4		-The U.K.’s part
5		-AND
6		- to do so.
7		-B Violation
8		-C Net Benefits
9		-1 Common Usage ~-~- most people who support nuclear power are often against weapons – they situate the topic in the wrong direction
10		-NEIS: Nuclear Energy Information Service Illinois Nuclear Power Watchdog “Nuclear Power and Nuclear Weapons.” Nuclear Energy Information Service, 2004. RP
11		-There is an
12		-AND
13		- a different conclusion.
14		-
15		-2 Real World Education – bomb making uses entirely different materials than electricity based reactors do
16		-Marder: Marder, Jenny Contributor, PBS News “Nuclear Reactors and Nuclear Bombs: What Defines the Differences?” PBS News, April 2011. RP
17		-A nuclear reactor
18		-AND
19		-possible,” Caracappa said.
20		-
21		-3 Limits – they allow an absurd number of affs. Banning nuclear weapons allows prolif positions, affs about international treaties, deterrence, Iran deal Affs, and creates a whole new angle to the topic that nobody else has researched.
22		-
23		-D Fairness is a voter

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-09-11 01:22:26.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Wesley Hu, Heaven Montague, James Wayne

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Bronx Science JJ

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-6

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Quarters

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Harrison Piliero Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-SEPTOCT - Nuclear Weapons T

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Byram Invitational