Changes for page Harrison Piliero Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:35
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[66]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-11-05 16:56:24. 9771 +2016-11-05 16:56:24.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[67]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,27 @@ 1 +====A Interpretation: The Aff must defend implementation of a policy limiting qualified immunity==== 2 + 3 +====‘Resolved’ denotes a proposal to be enacted by law==== 4 + 5 +Words and Phrases 64 Permanent Edition “Resolved.”. 1964 6 + 7 +Definition of the 8 +AND 9 +establish by law”. 10 + 11 +====B Violation==== 12 + 13 +====C Net Benefits==== 14 + 15 + 16 +====1 Ground – not defending implementation means that most disads don’t apply – I lose elections, court clog, over-deterrence, and more==== 17 + 18 +====2 Real World – discussion of policy is key to gain change==== 19 + 20 +Coverstone writes: COVERSTONE Dir of Debate @ Montgomery Bell Academy 2k6 Alan-former debater @ Wake, MBA = private prep school in Nashville; “Acting on Activism”; DEBATER’S RESEARCH GUIDE (DRG), National Service Topic; 21 + 22 +The power to 23 +AND 24 +effective political activism 25 + 26 +====3 Limits – they can defend anything in the context of it being a good idea==== 27 +====D T is a voting issue==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-05 16:56:25.777 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Nick Smith - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lake Highland RS - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +40 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harrison Piliero Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NOVDEC - Implementation T - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Apple Valley