| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,28 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Their use of Foucault is anti-women – 2 reasons==== |
|
2 |
+====1. Foucault’s omission of women in his analysis of power perpetuates patriarchy===== |
|
3 |
+Featherstone |
|
4 |
+A subtlety exists |
|
5 |
+AND |
|
6 |
+ creates new oppressions. |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+====2. Foucault’s focus on the masculine gender denies women power to resist power – rape becomes justified in an attempt to present objective relationships of power.===== |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+Johnson ‘04 |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+Some feminist scholars |
|
14 |
+AND |
|
15 |
+ a form of |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+ |
|
22 |
+====Hold debaters accountable for their discourse—you are an educator and this is a teachable moment—if you endorse her speech act as a 1ac, endorse all of it.===== |
|
23 |
+ |
|
24 |
+Vincent 13 – (Christopher Debate Coach, former college NDT debater “Re-Conceptualizing Our Performances: Accountability In Lincoln Douglas Debate” http://victorybriefs.com/vbd/2013/10/re-conceptualizing-our-performances-accountability-in-lincoln-douglas-debate) |
|
25 |
+ |
|
26 |
+Charles Mills argues |
|
27 |
+AND |
|
28 |
+ community could have. |