Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[62]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[63]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[62]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-11-05 00:22:30.126
	1	+2016-11-05 00:22:30.0

Caselist.CitesClass[63]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,37 @@
	1	+====A Interpretation: The Aff must prove the desirability of limiting qualified immunity. To clarify, they must operate under comparative worlds====
	2	+
	3	+====B Violation====
	4	+
	5	+
	6	+====C Net Benefits====
	7	+
	8	+1 Strat skew – they incentivize ridiculous spikes that make negating impossible.
	9	+
	10	+Mangus: Mangus, Michael Former debater who got to quarters of TOC, neuroscientist “Value Comparison” The Lincoln Douglas Debate Journal, April 2008. RP
	11	+a. groundwork. controversial
	12	+AND
	13	+response is impossible.
	14	+
	15	+2 Resolvability – truth claims can’t be easily weighed against each other.
	16	+Mangus: Mangus, Michael Former debater who got to quarters of TOC, neuroscientist “Value Comparison” The Lincoln Douglas Debate Journal, April 2008. RP
	17	+
	18	+
	19	+3. irresolvable debates. instead
	20	+AND
	21	+feature these strategies.
	22	+
	23	+3 Advocacy skills – debaters are trained just to question truths or falsities but not to compare different visions of the world.
	24	+
	25	+
	26	+Mangus: Mangus, Michael Former debater who got to quarters of TOC, neuroscientist “Value Comparison” The Lincoln Douglas Debate Journal, April 2008. RP
	27	+
	28	+4. defense-only strategies. especially
	29	+AND
	30	+a non-arbitrary way.
	31	+
	32	+Outweighs their burden
	33	+
	34	+1 Fair version solves ~-~- they can READ THEIR BURDEN UNDER MY INTERP – it just reconceptualizes what offense links – for example, I could meet the burden by establishing that QI is inconsistent with those requirements
	35	+2 Outweighs the burden independently – this is functionally a topicality interp. It questions what offense can link to the advocacy – this also means that this isn’t an offensive counterinterp, since it indicts the practice of the Aff independently.
	36	+
	37	+====D Theory is a voting issue====

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-11-05 00:22:31.31

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Louie Kollar

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Scarsdale LS

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+38

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harrison Piliero Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+0 - Comparative Worlds Theory

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Apple Valley