Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[63]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[63]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,37 +1,0 @@
1		-====A Interpretation: The Aff must prove the desirability of limiting qualified immunity. To clarify, they must operate under comparative worlds====
2		-
3		-====B Violation====
4		-
5		-
6		-====C Net Benefits====
7		-
8		-1 Strat skew – they incentivize ridiculous spikes that make negating impossible.
9		-
10		-Mangus: Mangus, Michael Former debater who got to quarters of TOC, neuroscientist “Value Comparison” The Lincoln Douglas Debate Journal, April 2008. RP
11		-a. groundwork. controversial
12		-AND
13		-response is impossible.
14		-
15		-2 Resolvability – truth claims can’t be easily weighed against each other.
16		-Mangus: Mangus, Michael Former debater who got to quarters of TOC, neuroscientist “Value Comparison” The Lincoln Douglas Debate Journal, April 2008. RP
17		-
18		-
19		-3. irresolvable debates. instead
20		-AND
21		-feature these strategies.
22		-
23		-====3 Advocacy skills – debaters are trained just to question truths or falsities but not to compare different visions of the world.====
24		-
25		-
26		-Mangus: Mangus, Michael Former debater who got to quarters of TOC, neuroscientist “Value Comparison” The Lincoln Douglas Debate Journal, April 2008. RP
27		-
28		-4. defense-only strategies. especially
29		-AND
30		-a non-arbitrary way.
31		-
32		-Outweighs their burden
33		-
34		-1 Fair version solves ~-~- they can READ THEIR BURDEN UNDER MY INTERP – it just reconceptualizes what offense links – for example, I could meet the burden by establishing that QI is inconsistent with those requirements
35		-2 Outweighs the burden independently – this is functionally a topicality interp. It questions what offense can link to the advocacy – this also means that this isn’t an offensive counterinterp, since it indicts the practice of the Aff independently.
36		-
37		-====D Theory is a voting issue====

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-11-05 00:21:57.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Louie Kollar

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Scarsdale LS

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-38

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Harrison Piliero Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-0 - Comparative Worlds Theory

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Apple Valley