| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,27 @@ |
|
1 |
+==== There is no hope to deal with the question of humanity from within western bodies of knowledge. Their attempt to solve problems using Western philosophy fails ~-~- any body of knowledge that’s created by the man-centric model of humanism must be deconstructed==== |
|
2 |
+Wynter: Wynter, Syliva Caribbean Professor of Philosophy “Interview with Syliva Wynter, ProudFlesh Interview.” PROUDFLESH: A New Afrikan Journal of Culture, Politics and Consciousness. 2006. RP |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+At this point |
|
5 |
+AND outside the West . . . |
|
6 |
+====Social systems of power must be discursively legitimated. The issue is not “what we speak,” but how “what we speak,” perpetuates cultural determinations of how systems work. The AFF reifies the structures that perpetuate white supremacism.==== |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+Wynter 2: Sylvia Wynter—1992 (“Beyond the Categories of the Master Conception: The Counterdoctrine of the Jamesian Poiesis,” in C.L.R. James Caribbean, eds. Paget Henry and Paul Buhle, 63-91) |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+To be effective |
|
11 |
+AND |
|
12 |
+discourses are constructed. |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+====Western anthropology guarantees endless suffering ~-~- turns case==== |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+Wynter: Wynter, Syliva Caribbean Professor of Philosophy “Interview with Syliva Wynter, ProudFlesh Interview.” PROUDFLESH: A New Afrikan Journal of Culture, Politics and Consciousness. 2006. RP |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+In fact, the |
|
19 |
+AND |
|
20 |
+are totally interlinked. |
|
21 |
+ |
|
22 |
+====The alternative is deviancy from Western anthropology ~-~- judges should reject instantiations of humanism.==== |
|
23 |
+Wynter: Wynter, Syliva Caribbean Professor of Philosophy “Interview with Syliva Wynter, ProudFlesh Interview.” PROUDFLESH: A New Afrikan Journal of Culture, Politics and Consciousness. 2006. RP |
|
24 |
+ |
|
25 |
+Never. Obviously then, |
|
26 |
+AND |
|
27 |
+ “Towards the Sociogenic |