Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[35]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[57]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[35]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-10-14 23:58:23.71
	1	+2016-10-14 23:58:23.0

Caselist.CitesClass[57]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,70 @@
	1	+====A Interpretation: The Aff must defend hypothetical enactment of the resolution by a government body.====
	2	+-This does not require the use of any particular style or type of evidence — only that the topic and a government policy should determine the debate’s subject matter.
	3	+====Prohibit is a legal action====
	4	+Blacks Law Dictionary: Blacks Law Dictionary “Prohibit” The Law Dictionary. RP
	5	+
	6	+restraining a certain
	7	+AND
	8	+legitimate legal authority.
	9	+
	10	+
	11	+====B Violation:====
	12	+
	13	+
	14	+====C Net Benefits====
	15	+====FIRST IS GROUND – topicality draws a clear line in the sand – otherwise AFFs can defend anything and arbitrarily decide their own ground.====
	16	+
	17	+
	18	+Nebel writes: Nebel, Jake Owner and Contributor, VBriefly “The Priority of Resolutional Semantics” VBriefly. December 2014. RP
	19	+
	20	+There is an
	21	+AND
	22	+avoids these problems.
	23	+
	24	+====SECOND IS DELIBERATION ~-~- Debate requires a specific point of difference in order to promote effective exchange—stasis and limits are key to engagement.====
	25	+
	26	+Steinberg and Freeley 13, David, Lecturer in Communicatio22n studies and rhetoric. Advisor to Miami Urban Debate League. Director of Debate at U Miami, Former President of CEDA. And ** Austin, attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, JD, Suffolk University, Argumentation and Debate, Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 121-4
	27	+
	28	+Debate is a
	29	+AND
	30	+the following discussion.
	31	+
	32	+====The impact outweighs— deliberative debate models impart skills vital to respond to social problems====
	33	+
	34	+Christian O. Lundberg 10 Professor of Communications @ University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, “Tradition of Debate in North Carolina” in Navigating Opportunity: Policy Debate in the 21st Century By Allan D. Louden, p. 311
	35	+
	36	+The second major
	37	+AND
	38	+the foreseen future.
	39	+
	40	+====THIRD IS JURISDICTION – the topic is a predefined issue we discuss – key to democracy and inclusion====
	41	+
	42	+Nebel: Nebel, Jake Owner and Contributor, VBriefly “The Priority of Resolutional Semantics” VBriefly. December 2014. RP
	43	+
	44	+
	45	+Another deontological argument
	46	+AND
	47	+the chosen resolution.
	48	+
	49	+====Jurisdiction outweighs – even if they win their interp is better for debate you still negate because it’s outside of the judges obligation====
	50	+
	51	+Nebel writes: Nebel, Jake Owner and Contributor, VBriefly “The Priority of Resolutional Semantics” VBriefly. December 2014. RP
	52	+
	53	+ A second strategy
	54	+AND
	55	+ to your opponent.
	56	+
	57	+====FOURTH IS TOPIC EDUCATION ~-~- debate about implementation in the context of nuclear power is good – the public lacks sufficient understanding====
	58	+Srinivasan: Srinivasan, T.N. “Fukushima and thereafter: Reassessment of risks of nuclear power," Energy Policy. 2013. RP
	59	+
	60	+While economic and
	61	+AND
	62	+in decision making (Ahluwalia, 2012)
	63	+
	64	+
	65	+
	66	+
	67	+
	68	+
	69	+
	70	+D Voting issue for Fairness

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-10-14 23:58:24.745

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Nathan Cha

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Pembroke Pines WW

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+35

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+3

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harrison Piliero Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+SEPTOCT - The Wall Strikes Back

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+New York City Invitational