Changes for page Harrison Piliero Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:35
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[0]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-09-09 23:19:44. 3021 +2016-09-09 23:19:44.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[0]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,65 @@ 1 +A Interpretation: The Aff must defend hypothetical enactment of the resolution by a government body. 2 + 3 +This does not require the use of any particular style or type of evidence — only that the topic and a government policy should determine the debate’s subject matter. 4 + 5 +Prohibit is a legal action 6 +Blacks Law Dictionary: Blacks Law Dictionary “Prohibit” The Law Dictionary. RP 7 + 8 +restraining a certain 9 +AND 10 + legitimate legal authority. 11 + 12 + 13 +B Violation: 14 + 15 + 16 +C Net Benefits 17 +FIRST IS DELIBERATION ~-~- Debate requires a specific point of difference in order to promote effective exchange—stasis and limits are key to engagement. 18 + 19 +Steinberg and Freeley 13, David, Lecturer in Communicatio22n studies and rhetoric. Advisor to Miami Urban Debate League. Director of Debate at U Miami, Former President of CEDA. And ** Austin, attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, JD, Suffolk University, Argumentation and Debate, Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 121-4 20 + 21 +Debate is a 22 +AND 23 +the following discussion. 24 + 25 +The impact outweighs— deliberative debate models impart skills vital to respond to social problems 26 + 27 +Christian O. Lundberg 10 Professor of Communications @ University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, “Tradition of Debate in North Carolina” in Navigating Opportunity: Policy Debate in the 21st Century By Allan D. Louden, p. 311 28 + 29 +The second major 30 +AND 31 + the foreseen future. 32 + 33 +SECOND IS EFFECTIVE DIALOGUE – Topicality is key to respect and engagement – link turns inclusivity 34 +Galloway 7: Galloway 7—Samford Comm prof (Ryan, Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, Vol. 28, 2007) 35 +Debate as a 36 +AND 37 +of topical advocacy. 38 + 39 + 40 + 41 +THIRD IS JURISDICTION – the topic is a predefined issue we discuss – key to democracy and inclusion 42 + 43 +Nebel: Nebel, Jake Owner and Contributor, VBriefly “The Priority of Resolutional Semantics” VBriefly. December 2014. RP 44 + 45 + 46 +Another deontological argument 47 +AND 48 +the chosen resolution. 49 + 50 +Jurisdiction outweighs – even if they win their interp is better for debate you still negate because it’s outside of the judges obligation 51 + 52 +Nebel writes: Nebel, Jake Owner and Contributor, VBriefly “The Priority of Resolutional Semantics” VBriefly. December 2014. RP 53 + 54 + A second strategy 55 +AND 56 + to your opponent. 57 + 58 + 59 + 60 + 61 + 62 + 63 + 64 + 65 +D Fairness is a voter - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-09-09 23:19:45.782 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Charlie Blatt - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lexington AA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harrison Piliero Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +SEPTOCT - A New Wall - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Byram Invitational