| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,24 @@ |
|
1 |
+====1 Intentionality reflects privileged voices and gives oppressors an easy out.==== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+Jamie Utt writes: Utt, Jamie Writer and Diversity Consulant “Intent vs Impact: Why Your Intentions Don’t Really Matter”. July 2013. Recut by RP |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+Imagine for a |
|
6 |
+AND |
|
7 |
+acting more accountably. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+====2 Drawing dichotomies between racist “consequences” and racist “intentions” is a view from nowhere – racist consequences still harm Blacks==== |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+Guess writes: Guess, Teresa J. Department of Sociology, University of Missouri-St. Louis “The Social Construction of Whiteness.” Critical Sociology, Volume 32. Issue 4. 2006. RP |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+Sedimentary traces of |
|
14 |
+AND |
|
15 |
+whites and non-whites. |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+====This is a voting issue – question the scholarship of the 1AC before the passage of the plan – they do not get to weigh the case==== |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+====Discourse in round matters —you are an educator and this is a teachable moment—if you endorse her speech act, endorse all of it==== |
|
20 |
+Vincent 13 – (Christopher Debate Coach, former college NDT debater “Re-Conceptualizing Our Performances: Accountability In Lincoln Douglas Debate” |
|
21 |
+ |
|
22 |
+Charles Mills argues |
|
23 |
+AND |
|
24 |
+community could have. |