| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,15 @@ |
|
1 |
+====A Interpretation: The Aff has to defend multiple countries prohibit the production of nuclear power, not just a single country.==== |
|
2 |
+The YD defines “countries” as: Your Dictionary “Countries.” RP |
|
3 |
+plural form of country. |
|
4 |
+====B Violation==== |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+====C Net benefits==== |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+1. Limits – they allow a ridiculous number of Affs – nearly 50 countries are involved with nuclear power to some extent – they get the China aff, Iran aff, South Africa aff, and dozens more |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+Nuclear Energy Institute: Nuclear Energy Institute Group that studies nuclear power “World Statistics.” Nuclear Energy Institute. 2016. RP |
|
11 |
+As of May |
|
12 |
+AND |
|
13 |
+their total electricity. |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+2. Precision – the resolution specifically says countries, which implies multiple acting – outweighs their arguments since even if their interp is better for debate, it’s the wrong resolution. I can’t debate the handgun topics again for better limits – likewise, their interp isn’t accurate so they should lose |