| ... |
... |
@@ -1,19
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-====The aff’s portrayal of China as a threat legitimizes otherizing power politics which transforms our conceptions of China into a social reality.==== |
| 2 |
|
-Pan: (Chengxin, Lecturer in International Relations, School of International and Political Studies at Deakin University, “The "China Threat" in American Self-Imagination”, Alternatives 29 (2004), 305-331, Galileo). 2004. |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-China and its |
| 5 |
|
-AND |
| 6 |
|
-make a contribution. |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
- |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
- |
| 12 |
|
-====That’s a voting issue – question their reps before the passage of the plan – they do not get to weigh the case.==== |
| 13 |
|
- |
| 14 |
|
-====Representational hostility to China SHAPES our understanding of foreing policymaking, so their reps are a prior question.==== |
| 15 |
|
-Lubman: (Stanley, Lecturer at the scholar center for law and society at Berkeley, “the dragon as demon: images of china on capitol hill”. 2004. |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
-Any faint hope |
| 18 |
|
-AND |
| 19 |
|
-this article suggests. |