Changes for page Harrison Piliero Aff
Summary
-
Objects (2 modified, 6 added, 17 removed)
- Caselist.CitesClass[42]
- Caselist.CitesClass[43]
- Caselist.CitesClass[44]
- Caselist.CitesClass[45]
- Caselist.CitesClass[47]
- Caselist.CitesClass[48]
- Caselist.CitesClass[49]
- Caselist.CitesClass[50]
- Caselist.CitesClass[51]
- Caselist.RoundClass[40]
- Caselist.RoundClass[41]
- Caselist.RoundClass[42]
- Caselist.RoundClass[43]
- Caselist.RoundClass[44]
- Caselist.RoundClass[45]
- Caselist.RoundClass[46]
- Caselist.RoundClass[47]
- Caselist.RoundClass[48]
- Caselist.RoundClass[49]
- Caselist.CitesClass[4]
- Caselist.CitesClass[24]
- Caselist.CitesClass[41]
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
- Caselist.RoundClass[22]
- Caselist.RoundClass[39]
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[42]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-03-26 18:30:12. 01 +2017-03-26 18:30:12.278
- Caselist.CitesClass[43]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,21 +1,0 @@ 1 -A. Interpretation: The neg may not read two standard texts if one of them is about why the status quo is always justified and the neg defends the status quo 2 - 3 -A. Interpretation: The neg may not read arguments that lead the judge to auto negate ~-~- to clarify, they can't make the presumption trigger on the framework or the auto negate argument on the plan text 4 - 5 -A. Interpretation: If the neg reads theory on a link of omission (i.e., something I did not specify) they must clarify in CX 6 - 7 -A. Interpretation: The neg may not read more than 5 NIBs and a counter burden and a counter role of the ballot 8 - 9 -A. Interpretation: The neg may not read an advocacy that defends banning nuclear power in all countries but one. To clarify, they can read PICs, but not this specific one. 10 - 11 -A. Interpretation: The neg may not theoretically justify util, say extinction precludes under all theories, and justify epistemic modesty. 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 -A. Interpretation: The negative may not read a burden that they concede is not sufficient, and also read theory that denies the Aff the RVI 16 - 17 -A. Interpretation: The negative may not read an advocacy of consulting indigenous people if its conditional, and they fiat that states don't intervene in consultation. 18 - 19 -A. Interpretation: All advocacies must be unconditional 20 - 21 -A. Interpretation: All reps arguments must be unconditional - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-03-27 21:12:39.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -41 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harrison Piliero Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0 - Broken Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Sept-Oct
- Caselist.CitesClass[44]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,100 +1,0 @@ 1 -====Part 1: Framework==== 2 - 3 -====IT’S ALL ABOUT CASH – Trumpian politics celebrate making money off of oppression, and wage war on higher education to lock in capitalism. Since doing nothing is doing something, the Role of the Judge is to Promote Critical Education, which means they must enhance our potential to fight dominant, oppressive social biases.==== 4 - 5 -Giroux: Giroux, Henry A. Waterbury Chair Professor, Pennsylvania State University “Why Teachers Matter in Dark Times” Truthout, May 2016. RP 6 - 7 -Americans live in 8 -AND 9 -States is failing. 10 - 11 -====The Role of the Ballot is to Endorse the Debater Who Better Reclaims the Academy. Reclaiming the academy means empowering its members – not just administrators – to produce new forms of knowledge and question status quo policies.==== 12 - 13 -====Debate should deal with real-world consequences; ideal theories legitimize oppression by ignoring its concrete manifestations.==== 14 - 15 -Curry: Curry, Tommy J. Ph.D., Associate Professor of Philosophy, Texas A and M University “The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century.” Victory Briefs, 2014. CH 16 - 17 -Despite the pronouncement 18 -AND 19 - before abstraction occurs.5 20 - 21 -====Part 2: It’s the Institution==== 22 - 23 -====Private corporations are taking over public colleges in the status quo.==== 24 - 25 -Applegate: Applegate, Jamie Journalist; B.A., U.C. Berkeley “Survey Shows Increased Reliance on Private Donations to Fund Public Universities.” The Daily Californian, 2012. CS 26 - 27 - 28 -A survey released 29 -AND 30 -from the state.” 31 - 32 - 33 -====And this ENTRENCHES neoliberalism, shutting out those who don’t meet corporate needs.==== 34 -Chatterjee et al: Chatterjee, Piya Dorothy Cruickshank Backstrand Chair of Gender and Women’s Studies Chair of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Department, Scripps College and Sunaina Maira Professor of Asian American Studies, UC Davis. The Imperial University: Academic Repression and Scholarly Dissent. University of Minnesota Press, 2014. CH 35 - 36 -The precarious positions 37 -AND 38 - and covert ways. 39 - 40 -====Indeed, campus speech restrictions use the language of “public safety” or “protecting students” to justify entrenching domination over students.==== 41 -Workers’ Liberty: Workers’ Liberty. “Universities, Capitalism, and Free Speech.” Workers’ Liberty, March 2015. RP 42 - 43 -For centuries, university 44 -AND 45 -and attempted elsewhere. 46 - 47 -====Worse, this squashes dissent: when people speak up, schools fight back, making change impossible.==== 48 - 49 -Godrej 1: Godrej, Farah. Professor of Political Science, UC Riverdale “Neoliberalism, Militarization, and the Price of Dissent.” Published in Piya Chatterjee and Sunaina Maira (eds.), The Imperial University: Academic Repression and Scholarly Dissent. University of Minnesota Press, 2014. RP 50 - 51 -In this chapter, 52 -AND 53 - prosecution against dissenters. 54 - 55 - 56 -====Advocacy: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. This makes them agents of inaction – they aren’t allowed to restrict speech.==== 57 - 58 -====Part 3: Free Your Mind Instead==== 59 - 60 -====Free speech exposes invisible power abuses and checks back oppressors. It’s time to act; engagement is key to avoid complicity with injustice.==== 61 - 62 -Oparah 1: Oparah, Julia C. Professor, Mills College “Challenging Complicity.” Published in Piya Chatterjee and Sunaina Maira (eds.), The Imperial University: Academic Repression and Scholarly Dissent. University of Minnesota Press, 2014. RP 63 - 64 -If anti-imperialist 65 -AND 66 - the “criminal class.” 67 - 68 -====Critique from within the academy draws attention to neoliberal injustice – empirics prove.==== 69 - 70 -Delgado and Ross: Delgado, Sandra Doctoral Student in Curriculum Studies, University of British Columbia, and E. Wayne Ross Professor in the Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia “Students in Revolt: The Pedagogical Potential of Student Collective Action in the Age of the Corporate University.” 2016. RP 71 - 72 - 73 -As students’ collective 74 -AND 75 - programs or pleas. 76 - 77 -====And student speech empirically works to resist cap.==== 78 - 79 -Oparah 2: Oparah, Julia C. Professor, Mills College “Challenging Complicity.” Published in Piya Chatterjee and Sunaina Maira (eds.), The Imperial University: Academic Repression and Scholarly Dissent. University of Minnesota Press, 2014. RP 80 - 81 -What Henry Giroux 82 -AND 83 -military-prison- industrial complex. 84 - 85 -====Further, freedom to speak out is the first step towards resisting neoliberal domination.==== 86 -Farber: Farber, Samuel. Professor Emeritus of Political Science, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York The Politics of Che Guevara: Theory and Practice. “A Socialist Approach to Free Speech.” Jacobin Magazine, February 2017. RP 87 - 88 -For some left 89 -AND 90 - for their emancipation. 91 - 92 - 93 -====Let’s not take the bait: “speech codes” and other school-based policies use neoliberal logic to lull people into complacency and silence. That won’t work – we need unfettered dissent to rupture hegemonic forces.==== 94 - 95 -Godrej 2: Godrej, Farah. Professor of Political Science, UC Riverdale “Neoliberalism, Militarization, and the Price of Dissent.” Published in Piya Chatterjee and Sunaina Maira (eds.), The Imperial University: Academic Repression and Scholarly Dissent. University of Minnesota Press, 2014. RP 96 - 97 - 98 -The language of 99 -AND 100 - its high “price.” - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-03-30 11:35:52.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -John Sims, Shania Hunt - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Newark BA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -42 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harrison Piliero Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JANFEB - Imperial University AC v2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -King Round Robin
- Caselist.CitesClass[45]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,110 +1,0 @@ 1 -====Part 1: Framework==== 2 -====THE ORWELLIAN NIGHTMARE HAS COME TRUE – Trump’s here to stay, and the militarized right is taking over – resistance is key now more than ever. The Role of the Judge is to Promote Critical Education, which means they must enhance our potential to fight dominant, oppressive social biases.==== 3 - 4 -Giroux 1: Giroux, Henry A. Waterbury Chair Professor, Pennsylvania State University “War Culture, Militarism, and Racist violence Under Trump.” Truthout, December 2016. RP 5 - 6 -With Donald Trump’s 7 -AND 8 - is too late. 9 -====The Role of the Ballot is to Endorse the Better Method for Critically Empowering Students. Critical empowerment exists when we have the skills to question and attack the status quo – this is key to any movement against oppression.==== 10 - 11 -Giroux 2: Giroux, Henry A. Waterbury Chair Professor, Pennsylvania State University “Radical Politics in the Age of American Authoritarianism: Connecting the Dots.” Truthout, April 2016. RP 12 - 13 -At the root 14 -AND 15 - democratic liberation movement. 16 - 17 -====Part 2: Kept on the Inside==== 18 - 19 -====CAMPUS SPEECH IS UNDER ATTACK FROM EVERY DIRECTION – demagogues use codes to stifle and make students sit down and shut up. They keep students ignorant so they don’t even question these practices.==== 20 - 21 -Friedersdorf: Friedersdorf, Conor Friedersdorf is a staff writer at The Atlantic, where he focuses on politics and national affairs. He lives in Venice, California, and is the founding editor of The Best of Journalism, a newsletter devoted to exceptional nonfiction. “The Glaring Evidence That Free Speech Is Threatened on Campus .” The Atlantic. March 2016. RP 22 - 23 -Here’s one: Many 24 -AND 25 -threats to speech. 26 - 27 -====And hate speech is getting worse in the status quo, despite the existence of speech codes.==== 28 - 29 -Long ’17: Long, Katherine. Journalist, Seattle Times “UW on Edge Over Perception of Rise in Hate Speech.” The Seattle Times, January 27, 2017. RP 30 - 31 -More than a 32 -AND 33 - and feeling futile.” 34 - 35 -====In fact, campus racism is often covert, so speech codes can’t solve it.==== 36 - 37 -Boatright et al: Boatright, Su L. Professor of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Nathaniel Crockett Graduate Student Textiles, Fashion Merchandising, and Design, University of Rhode Island, and Yvette Harps-Logan Associate Professor of Psychology and Textiles, Fashion Merchandising, and Design, University of Rhode Island. “White Privilege Is Alive and Well on Many College Campuses.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, August 15, 2013. CH 38 - 39 -Yet many white 40 -AND 41 - in this obligation. 42 - 43 -====Both globally and domestically, speech codes worsen hate and target minorities – empirics prove.==== 44 - 45 -Strossen 1: Strossen, Nadine. John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law, New York Law School “Incitement to Hatred: Should There Be a Limit?” Southern Illinois University Law Journal, Vol. 25, 2001. RP 46 - 47 -Based on actual 48 -AND 49 - to disempowered groups. 50 - 51 -====Indeed, the type of speech being censored doesn’t matter. The question isn’t whether all speech is good, but whether colleges have the right to define which speech stays and which goes.==== 52 - 53 -Glasser: Glasser, Ira. Former Executive Director, American Civil Liberties Union Quoted in Jonathan Haidt’s “Hate Speech is Free Speech.” Spiked-online.com, June 12, 2016. RP 54 - 55 -How is ‘hate 56 -AND 57 - back on us. 58 - 59 -====And all speech codes are arbitrary and reify state power, even if a particular type of speech is bad – exceptions are modeled and undermine free speech.==== 60 - 61 -White: White, Ken. Criminal Defense Lawyer, Brown, White, and Newhouse “Lawsplainer: Why Flag Burning Matters, And How it Relates To Crush Videos.” Popehat, November 2016. RP 62 - 63 -In free speech 64 -AND 65 -right it is. 66 - 67 - 68 -====Advocacy: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. This makes them agents of inaction – they aren’t allowed to restrict speech.==== 69 - 70 - 71 -====Part 3: Let the Words Fall Out==== 72 - 73 -====Deregulating campus speech sets legal precedents that enable movements and protests, even if it protects bigots – Civil Rights prove.==== 74 - 75 -ACLU: The American Civil Liberties Union. “Hate Speech on Campus,” American Civil Liberties Union, 2016. BE 76 - 77 -A: Free speech 78 -AND 79 - of the peace." 80 - 81 -====Further, the question isn’t whether all speech is good, but who should regulate it: administrators, or students themselves – empirics show community counter-speech solves.==== 82 -Majeed: Majeed, Azhar. J.D., University of Michigan “Defying the Constitution: The Rise, Persistence, and Prevalence Of Campus Speech Codes.” Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy, 7 Geo. J.L. and Pub. Pol’y 481, 2009. CH 83 - 84 -Moreover, the counterspeech 85 -AND 86 -to hateful messages. 87 - 88 -====Affirming promotes radical protests that don’t rely on traditional speech.==== 89 - 90 -Johnston: Johnston, Angus. Writer, Rolling Stone “There's No College P.C. Crisis: In Defense of Student Protesters.” Rolling Stone, December 2015. RP 91 - 92 -The demographics of 93 -AND 94 - and stern rebuke." 95 - 96 -====And protests are a means of grassroots reform that can spillover to broader social change.==== 97 - 98 -Barnhardt: Barnhardt, Cassie. Assistant Professor, College of Education, University of Iowa “Embracing Student Activism.” Higher Education Today, March 2, 2016. MZ 99 - 100 -This past November, 101 -AND 102 -claims or grievances. 103 - 104 -====Beyond that, free speech means students reclaim public spaces from racist institutions and create a cultural change.==== 105 - 106 -Block: Block, Jim. Professor of Political Theory and Political Culture, DePaul University “The Legacy and Promise of the Free Speech Movement.” Popular Resistance, October 2014. RP 107 - 108 -This past weekend 109 -AND 110 - conformist American lifestyle. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-02 17:37:48.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Martin Sigalow, Joseph Millman - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Stuyvesant KF - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -43 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harrison Piliero Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JANFEB - Radical Democracy AC v7 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Penn Round Robin
- Caselist.CitesClass[47]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,129 +1,0 @@ 1 -====Part 1: Framework==== 2 - 3 -====THE ORWELLIAN NIGHTMARE HAS COME TRUE – Trump’s here to stay, and the militarized right is taking over – resistance is key now more than ever. The Role of the Judge is to Promote Critical Education, which means they must enhance our potential to fight dominant, oppressive social biases.==== 4 - 5 -Giroux 1: Giroux, Henry A. Waterbury Chair Professor, Pennsylvania State University “War Culture, Militarism, and Racist violence Under Trump.” Truthout, December 2016. RP 6 - 7 -With Donald Trump’s 8 -AND 9 - is too late. 10 - 11 -====The Role of the Ballot is to Endorse the Better Method for Critically Empowering Students. Critical empowerment exists when we have the skills to question and attack the status quo – this is key to any movement against oppression.==== 12 - 13 -Giroux 2: Giroux, Henry A. Waterbury Chair Professor, Pennsylvania State University “Radical Politics in the Age of American Authoritarianism: Connecting the Dots.” Truthout, April 2016. RP 14 - 15 -At the root 16 -AND 17 -democratic liberation movement. 18 - 19 - 20 -====Debate should deal with real-world consequences; ideal theories legitimize oppression by ignoring its concrete manifestations.==== 21 - 22 -Curry: Curry, Tommy J. Ph.D., Associate Professor of Philosophy, Texas A and M University “The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century.” Victory Briefs, 2014. CH 23 - 24 -Despite the pronouncement 25 -AND 26 -before abstraction occurs.5 27 - 28 -====Part 2: Kept on the Inside==== 29 - 30 -====CAMPUS SPEECH IS UNDER ATTACK FROM EVERY DIRECTION – demagogues use codes to stifle and make students sit down and shut up. They keep students ignorant so they don’t even question these practices.==== 31 - 32 -Friedersdorf: Friedersdorf, Conor Friedersdorf is a staff writer at The Atlantic, where he focuses on politics and national affairs. He lives in Venice, California, and is the founding editor of The Best of Journalism, a newsletter devoted to exceptional nonfiction. “The Glaring Evidence That Free Speech Is Threatened on Campus .” The Atlantic. March 2016. RP 33 - 34 -Here’s one: Many 35 -AND 36 -threats to speech. 37 - 38 -====And hate speech is getting worse in the status quo, despite the existence of speech codes.==== 39 - 40 -Long ’17: Long, Katherine. Journalist, Seattle Times “UW on Edge Over Perception of Rise in Hate Speech.” The Seattle Times, January 27, 2017. RP 41 - 42 -More than a 43 -AND 44 - and feeling futile.” 45 - 46 -====Both globally and domestically, speech codes worsen hate and target minorities – empirics prove.==== 47 - 48 -Strossen 1: Strossen, Nadine. John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law, New York Law School “Incitement to Hatred: Should There Be a Limit?” Southern Illinois University Law Journal, Vol. 25, 2001. RP 49 - 50 -Based on actual 51 -AND 52 - to disempowered groups. 53 - 54 -====Indeed, the type of speech being censored doesn’t matter. The question isn’t whether all speech is good, but whether colleges have the right to define which speech stays and which goes.==== 55 - 56 -Glasser: Glasser, Ira. Former Executive Director, American Civil Liberties Union Quoted in Jonathan Haidt’s “Hate Speech is Free Speech.” Spiked-online.com, June 12, 2016. RP 57 - 58 -How is ‘hate 59 -AND 60 - back on us. 61 - 62 -====And all speech codes are arbitrary and reify state power, even if a particular type of speech is bad – exceptions are modeled and undermine free speech.==== 63 - 64 -White: White, Ken. Criminal Defense Lawyer, Brown, White, and Newhouse “Lawsplainer: Why Flag Burning Matters, And How it Relates To Crush Videos.” Popehat, November 2016. RP 65 - 66 -In free speech 67 -AND 68 -right it is. 69 - 70 - 71 -====Advocacy: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. This makes them agents of inaction – they aren’t allowed to restrict speech.==== 72 - 73 -====Part 3: Let the Words Fall Out==== 74 - 75 -====Deregulating campus speech sets legal precedents that enable movements and protests, even if it protects bigots – Civil Rights prove.==== 76 - 77 -ACLU: The American Civil Liberties Union. “Hate Speech on Campus,” American Civil Liberties Union, 2016. BE 78 - 79 -A: Free speech 80 -AND 81 -of the peace." 82 - 83 -====Indeed, the question isn’t whether all speech is good, but who should regulate it: administrators, or students themselves. Non-legal remedies like shunning are designed to deter harmful speech.==== 84 - 85 -Etzioni: Etzioni, Amitai. Director of the Institute for Communitarian Policy Studies, George Washington University The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities, and the Communitarian Agenda. New York: Crown Publishers, Inc., 1993. CH 86 - 87 -Thus it might 88 - AND 89 - offended by them. 90 - 91 -====Affirming promotes radical protests that don’t rely on traditional speech.==== 92 - 93 -Johnston: Johnston, Angus. Writer, Rolling Stone “There's No College P.C. Crisis: In Defense of Student Protesters.” Rolling Stone, December 2015. RP 94 - 95 -The demographics of 96 -AND 97 -, and stern rebuke." 98 - 99 -====In fact, actually achieving radical change requires the freedom to protest – protests empirically achieved civil rights, military reform, economic justice, and more.==== 100 - 101 -Gay: Gay, Roxanne. Contributor, New Republic “Student Activism Is Serious Business.” New Republic, November 2015. RP 102 - 103 -Of late, there 104 -AND 105 - came before them. 106 -====Beyond that, free speech means students reclaim public spaces from racist institutions and create a cultural change.==== 107 - 108 -Block: Block, Jim. Professor of Political Theory and Political Culture, DePaul University “The Legacy and Promise of the Free Speech Movement.” Popular Resistance, October 2014. RP 109 - 110 -This past weekend 111 -AND 112 - conformist American lifestyle. 113 - 114 -====Speech codes drive oppression underground – students can’t mobilize against racism if they never see it.==== 115 - 116 -Calleros: Calleros, Charles R. Professor of Law, Arizona State University “Paternalism, Counterspeech, and Campus Hate-Speech Codes.” Arizona State Law Journal, Winter 1995. RP 117 - 118 - 119 -One cannot eliminate 120 -AND 121 - at every turn. 122 - 123 -====Narrow campus codes against Constitutionally unprotected speech solve for hate speech and other undesirable speech.==== 124 - 125 -Johnson: Johnson, Catherine B. J.D. Candidate, Fordham University School of Law, 2001 “Stopping Hate Without Stifling Speech: Re-examining the Merits of Hate Speech Codes on University Campuses.” Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol. 27, Issue 6, 1999. CH 126 - 127 -In drafting such 128 -AND 129 - speech should prevail.” - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-02 17:38:21.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Chris Castillo, Jenn Melin - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Westwood RS - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -45 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harrison Piliero Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JANFEB - Radical Democracy AC v6 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -King Round Robin
- Caselist.CitesClass[48]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,95 +1,0 @@ 1 -====Part 1: Ignorance Isn’t Strength==== 2 - 3 -====THE ORWELLIAN NIGHTMARE HAS COME TRUE – Trump’s here to stay, and the militarized right is taking over – resistance is key now more than ever. The Role of the Judge is to Promote Critical Education, which means they must enhance our potential to fight dominant, oppressive social biases.==== 4 - 5 -Giroux 1: Giroux, Henry A. Waterbury Chair Professor, Pennsylvania State University “War Culture, Militarism, and Racist violence Under Trump.” Truthout, December 2016. RP 6 - 7 -With Donald Trump’s 8 -AND 9 -is too late. 10 -====The Role of the Ballot is to Endorse the Better Method for Critically Empowering Students. Critical empowerment exists when we have the skills to question and attack the status quo==== 11 - 12 -====Debate should deal with real-world consequences; ideal theories legitimize oppression by ignoring its concrete manifestations.==== 13 - 14 -Curry: Curry, Tommy J. Ph.D., Associate Professor of Philosophy, Texas A and M University “The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century.” Victory Briefs, 2014. CH 15 - 16 -Despite the pronouncement 17 -AND 18 -before abstraction occurs.5 19 - 20 -====Part 2: The Object of Power is Power==== 21 - 22 -====MINORITY PROFESSORS ARE UNDER ATTACK – colleges are monitoring them now.==== 23 -Yancy: Yancy, George. Associate Professor of Philosophy, Duquesne University “I Am a Dangerous Professor.” The New York Times, November 2016. RP 24 -Those familiar with 25 -AND 26 -in the world. 27 -====This endangers ALL radical knowledge production.==== 28 - 29 -Chatterjee et al: Chatterjee, Piya Dorothy Cruickshank Backstrand Chair of Gender and Women’s Studies Chair of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Department, Scripps College and Sunaina Maira Professor of Asian American Studies, UC Davis. The Imperial University: Academic Repression and Scholarly Dissent. University of Minnesota Press, 2014. CH 30 - 31 - 32 -The precarious positions 33 -AND 34 - and covert ways. 35 -====And this isn’t a fluke: colleges are shutting down activist professors nation-wide.==== 36 - 37 -Viera: Viera, Mariana. J.D. Candidate, American University’s Washington College of Law “Teacher Talk: Professors’ Fight to Speak Openly Often Isn’t Easy.” Student Press Law Center, August 2015. MZ 38 - 39 - 40 -Having accepted a 41 -AND 42 - improvement and progress.” 43 - 44 -====Further, this solidifies Trump’s racism and makes change impossible.==== 45 -Perry: Perry, Andre. Contributor, The Washington Post “Saving Academic Freedom from Trump’s ‘Post-Truth’ Nation.” Washington Monthly, November 2016. RP 46 -The world is 47 -AND 48 - of white superiority. 49 -====Trusting college administrators to decide who and what should be heard arbitrarily expands their power – this spills over and deters.==== 50 -Herron: Herron, Vince Class of 1994, University of Southern California Law Center. B.A. 1990, University of California, Los Angeles. “NOTES: INCREASING THE SPEECH: DIVERSITY, CAMPUS SPEECH CODES, AND THE PURSUIT OF TRUTH.” Southern California Law Review. January 1994. RP 51 - 52 -Professor Matsuda argues 53 -AND 54 - increase the speech. 55 - 56 - 57 -====Plan: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech by faculty members. This makes them agents of inaction – they aren’t allowed to restrict professors’ speech.==== 58 - 59 -Sullivan and White: Sullivan , Thomas President, University of Vermont and Lawrence White Vice President and General Counsel at the University of Delaware. “For Faculty Free Speech, the Tide is Turning.” The Chronicle of Higher Education. September 2013. RP 60 - 61 -Faculty members sometimes 62 - 63 -AND 64 - of the professoriate. 65 - 66 -====Part 3: Control the Future==== 67 - 68 -====The aff is key to ensuring that people BEYOND white men control the academy.==== 69 - 70 -Delgado: Delgado, Richard. Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania “The Imperial Scholar: Reflections on a Review of Civil Rights Literature.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review. March 1984. RP 71 - 72 -When I began 73 -AND 74 - are under consideration. 75 -====Instead, the aff means minorities RECLAIM THE ACADEMY in ways it can’t co-opt.==== 76 - 77 -Lomax: Lomax, Tamura. Ph.D., Vanderbilt University “Black Women’s Lives Don’t Matter in Academia Either, or Why I Quit Academic Spaces that Don’t Value Black Women’s Life and Labor.” The Feminist Wire, May 18, 2015. MZ 78 - 79 -In other words, 80 -AND 81 - hurts higher education. 82 - 83 -====And affirming minority professors has spillover effects due to modeling – the free speech movement has worked==== 84 -Aptheker: Aptheker, Bettina. Professor of African American and Women’s Studies, San Jose State University “Gender Politics and the FSM.” The Free Speech Movement: Reflections on Berkeley in the 1960s, 2002. MZ 85 - 86 -Throughout the months 87 -AND 88 -Regental (white/male) authority. 89 -====In fact, minority faculty speech builds coalitions between groups and increases new knowledge production.==== 90 - 91 -Davidson: Davidson, Dr. Martin. Professor, Darden School of Business, University of Virginia “On the Importance of Minority Faculty.” LeveragingDifference, February 2011. RP 92 - 93 -I was recently 94 -AND 95 - quality business education. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-15 22:50:31.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Mathew Pregasen, Andrew Monagle, Kathy Wang - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Success Academy SC - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -46 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Semis - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harrison Piliero Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JANFEB - Faculty Plan - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harrison Round Robin
- Caselist.CitesClass[49]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,3 +1,0 @@ 1 -Hey! If you need cites for something, or want to know anything more specific, feel free to contact me either through email or Facebook. I'll disclose cards full text if you ask me to send specific cards. 2 -Email: raffipiliero@aol.com 3 -Facebook: Cater Piliero - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-28 15:10:41.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -47 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harrison Piliero Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0 - Contact - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All
- Caselist.CitesClass[50]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,112 +1,0 @@ 1 -====Part 1: Framework.==== 2 - 3 -====THE ORWELLIAN NIGHTMARE HAS COME TRUE ~-~- Trump’s here to stay, and the militarized right is taking over. Since resistance is key now more than ever, The Role of the Judge is to Promote Critical Education, which means they must enhance our potential to fight dominant, oppressive social biases.==== 4 - 5 -Giroux 1: Giroux, Henry A. Waterbury Chair Professor, Pennsylvania State University “War Culture, Militarism, and Racist violence Under Trump.” Truthout, December 2016. RP 6 - 7 -With Donald Trump’s 8 -AND 9 - radical change possible. 10 - 11 -====The Role of the Ballot is to Endorse the Better Method for Critically Empowering Students. Critical empowerment exists when we have the skills to question and attack the status quo. This is key to ALL alternatives.==== 12 - 13 -Giroux 2: Giroux, Henry A. Waterbury Chair Professor, Pennsylvania State University “Radical Politics in the Age of American Authoritarianism: Connecting the Dots.” Truthout, April 2016. RP 14 - 15 -At the root 16 -AND 17 -democratic liberation movement. 18 - 19 -====Next, critical empowerment requires exposing hidden oppression as a bottom-up political strategy.===== 20 - 21 -Flynn: Flynn, Molly. University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Contributor, Study Breaks “Covert Racism: How to Spot It and Stop It.” StudyBreaks.com, January 2017. RP 22 - 23 -If your white 24 -AND 25 -racism is dead. 26 -====Part 2: Covering Up==== 27 - 28 - 29 -====NEWSFLASH: most racists don’t admit it – they keep their actions hidden.==== 30 - 31 -Boatright et al: Boatright, Su L. Professor of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Nathaniel Crockett Graduate Student Textiles, Fashion Merchandising, and Design, University of Rhode Island, and Yvette Harps-Logan Associate Professor of Psychology and Textiles, Fashion Merchandising, and Design, University of Rhode Island. “White Privilege Is Alive and Well on Many College Campuses.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, August 15, 2013. CH 32 - 33 -Yet many white 34 -AND 35 - in this obligation. 36 - 37 -====And speech codes put a Band-Aid on a broken knee; they CAN’T solve because ask those who CAUSE the problem to fix it.==== 38 - 39 -Wise: Wise, Tim Anti-Racism Activist “Hate Speech Codes Will Not End Racism and Hate Crimes.” Opposing Viewpoints, 2007. RP 40 - 41 -Secondly, hate speech 42 -AND 43 - to bash others. 44 - 45 -====Indeed, both globally and domestically, speech codes worsen hate and target minorities – empirics prove.==== 46 - 47 -Strossen: Strossen, Nadine. John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law, New York Law School “Incitement to Hatred: Should There Be a Limit?” Southern Illinois University Law Journal, Vol. 25, 2001. RP 48 - 49 -Based on actual 50 -AND 51 - to disempowered groups. 52 - 53 -====And the type of speech being censored doesn’t matter; the question is whether colleges have the right to censor it.==== 54 - 55 -Glasser: Glasser, Ira. Former Executive Director, American Civil Liberties Union Quoted in Jonathan Haidt’s “Hate Speech is Free Speech.” Spiked-online.com, June 12, 2016. RP 56 - 57 -How is ‘hate 58 -AND 59 -back on us. 60 - 61 -====In fact, it’s not enough to show that one type of speech is bad – there must be a principle justifying ANY restriction, or it’s totally arbitrary.==== 62 - 63 -White: White, Ken. Criminal Defense Lawyer, Brown, White, and Newhouse “Lawsplainer: Why Flag Burning Matters, And How it Relates To Crush Videos.” Popehat, November 2016. RP 64 - 65 -In free speech 66 -AND 67 -right it is. 68 - 69 -====Advocacy: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. This makes them agents of inaction – they aren’t allowed to restrict speech.==== 70 - 71 - 72 -====Part 3: Unmasking the University==== 73 - 74 -====The only way to confront covert racism is to let those who experience it expose it.==== 75 -Calleros: Calleros, Charles R. Professor of Law, Arizona State University “Paternalism, Counterspeech, and Campus Hate-Speech Codes.” Arizona State Law Journal, Winter 1995. RP 76 - 77 - 78 -One cannot eliminate 79 -AND 80 - at every turn. 81 -====Indeed, activists can use free speech to make administrators and fellow students aware of their school’s own racism and bias.==== 82 - 83 -Johnston: Johnston, Angus. Writer, Rolling Stone “There's No College P.C. Crisis: In Defense of Student Protesters.” Rolling Stone, December 2015. RP 84 - 85 -Friedersdorf is shaming 86 -AND 87 - and stern rebuke." 88 - 89 -====In fact, free speech means students reclaim public spaces from racist institutions, creating cultural change.==== 90 - 91 -Block: Block, Jim. Professor of Political Theory and Political Culture, DePaul University “The Legacy and Promise of the Free Speech Movement.” Popular Resistance, October 2014. RP 92 - 93 -This past weekend 94 -AND 95 - conformist American lifestyle. 96 - 97 -====But even if this doenst happen, it’s infinitely worse to rely on white administrators who can’t identify real racism to regulate it.==== 98 - 99 -Sachs: Sachs, George. Psychologist and Contributor, Huffington Post “10 Ways White Liberals Perpetuate Racism.” Huffington Post, September 2015. RP 100 - 101 -Maybe years of 102 -AND 103 -fact, another microinvalidation. 104 - 105 -====Meanwhile, the aff at least makes it possible for minorities to respond themselves to offensive speech, an option necessary for ANY more radical alternatives.==== 106 - 107 -Bon: Bon, Dorian Contributor, Socialist Worker “Who’s Behind the Free Speech Crisis on Campus?” Socialist Workers, April 2017. RP 108 - 109 - 110 -THE TRANSFORMATION of 111 -AND 112 - that but ourselves. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-29 17:33:17.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Paul Zhou - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Collegiate KY - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -48 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harrison Piliero Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JANFEB - Radical Democracy AC v8 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -TOC
- Caselist.CitesClass[51]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,98 +1,0 @@ 1 -=====I value Social Justice.==== 2 -====Since no one’s inherently worth more than another, justice means promoting equality. Yet few people feel responsible for changing existing institutional arrangements.==== 3 - 4 -Young 1: Young, Iris Marion. Professor of Political Science, University of Chicago “Political Responsibility and Structural Injustice.” University of Kansas, May 5, 2003. CH 5 - 6 - 7 -This, then, is 8 -AND 9 - try to change. 10 - 11 -====And people’s actions inevitably reify existing inequities in ways intent-based theories can’t resolve.==== 12 - 13 -Young 2: Young, Iris Marion. Professor of Political Science, University of Chicago “Political Responsibility and Structural Injustice.” University of Kansas, May 5, 2003. CH 14 - 15 -It is misleading, 16 -AND 17 - difficult to change. 18 - 19 - 20 -====Thus, the standard is Promoting Social Equality. Promoting social equality means acknowledging that all people have a role in reifying structural violence.==== 21 -Young 3: Young, Iris Marion. Professor of Political Science, University of Chicago “Political Responsibility and Structural Injustice.” University of Kansas, May 5, 2003. CH 22 - 23 -(1) Unlike a 24 -AND 25 - will change it. 26 -Part 2: Covering Up 27 -NEWSFLASH: most racists don’t admit it – they keep their actions hidden. 28 -Boatright et al: Boatright, Su L. Professor of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Nathaniel Crockett Graduate Student Textiles, Fashion Merchandising, and Design, University of Rhode Island, and Yvette Harps-Logan Associate Professor of Psychology and Textiles, Fashion Merchandising, and Design, University of Rhode Island. “White Privilege Is Alive and Well on Many College Campuses.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, August 15, 2013. CH 29 - 30 -Yet many white 31 -AND 32 - in this obligation. 33 - 34 - 35 -And speech codes put a Band-Aid on a broken knee; they CAN’T solve because ask those who CAUSE the problem to fix it. 36 -Wise: Wise, Tim Anti-Racism Activist “Hate Speech Codes Will Not End Racism and Hate Crimes.” Opposing Viewpoints, 2007. RP 37 - 38 -Secondly, hate speech 39 -AND 40 - to bash others. 41 - 42 -Indeed, both globally and domestically, speech codes worsen hate and target minorities – empirics prove. 43 -Strossen: Strossen, Nadine. John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law, New York Law School “Incitement to Hatred: Should There Be a Limit?” Southern Illinois University Law Journal, Vol. 25, 2001. RP 44 - 45 -Based on actual 46 -AND 47 - to disempowered groups. 48 - 49 -And the type of speech being censored doesn’t matter; the question is whether colleges have the right to censor it. 50 -Glasser: Glasser, Ira. Former Executive Director, American Civil Liberties Union Quoted in Jonathan Haidt’s “Hate Speech is Free Speech.” Spiked-online.com, June 12, 2016. RP 51 - 52 -How is ‘hate 53 -AND 54 -back on us. 55 - 56 -In fact, it’s not enough to show that one type of speech is bad – there must be a principle justifying ANY restriction, or it’s totally arbitrary. 57 -White: White, Ken. Criminal Defense Lawyer, Brown, White, and Newhouse “Lawsplainer: Why Flag Burning Matters, And How it Relates To Crush Videos.” Popehat, November 2016. RP 58 - 59 -In free speech 60 -AND 61 -right it is. 62 - 63 -Advocacy: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. This makes them agents of inaction – they aren’t allowed to restrict speech. 64 -Part 3: Unmasking the University 65 -The only way to confront covert racism is to let those who experience it expose it. 66 -Calleros: Calleros, Charles R. Professor of Law, Arizona State University “Paternalism, Counterspeech, and Campus Hate-Speech Codes.” Arizona State Law Journal, Winter 1995. RP 67 - 68 -One cannot eliminate 69 -AND 70 - at every turn. 71 - 72 -Indeed, activists can use free speech to make administrators and fellow students aware of their school’s own racism and bias. 73 -Johnston: Johnston, Angus. Writer, Rolling Stone “There's No College P.C. Crisis: In Defense of Student Protesters.” Rolling Stone, December 2015. RP 74 - 75 -Friedersdorf is shaming 76 -AND 77 - and stern rebuke." 78 - 79 -In fact, free speech means students reclaim public spaces from racist institutions, creating cultural change. 80 -Block: Block, Jim. Professor of Political Theory and Political Culture, DePaul University “The Legacy and Promise of the Free Speech Movement.” Popular Resistance, October 2014. RP 81 - 82 -This past weekend 83 -AND 84 - conformist American lifestyle. 85 - 86 -But even if this doenst happen, it’s infinitely worse to rely on white administrators who can’t identify real racism to regulate it. 87 -Sachs: Sachs, George. Psychologist and Contributor, Huffington Post “10 Ways White Liberals Perpetuate Racism.” Huffington Post, September 2015. RP 88 - 89 -Maybe years of 90 -AND 91 -fact, another microinvalidation. 92 - 93 -Meanwhile, the aff at least makes it possible for minorities to respond themselves to offensive speech, an option necessary for ANY more radical alternatives. 94 -Bon: Bon, Dorian Contributor, Socialist Worker “Who’s Behind the Free Speech Crisis on Campus?” Socialist Workers, April 2017. RP 95 - 96 -THE TRANSFORMATION of 97 -AND 98 - that but ourselves. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-29 22:43:51.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oliver Roth - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -WDM Valley EM - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -49 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harrison Piliero Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JANFEB - Radical Democracy AC v9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -TOC
- Caselist.RoundClass[40]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -42
- Caselist.RoundClass[41]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -43 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-03-27 21:12:37.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Sept-Oct
- Caselist.RoundClass[42]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -44 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-03-30 11:35:43.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -John Sims, Shania Hunt - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Newark BA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -6 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,7 +1,0 @@ 1 -AC 2 --Imperial University 3 -NC 4 --Frats PIC 5 --Race DA 6 -NR 7 --Both - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -King Round Robin
- Caselist.RoundClass[43]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -45 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-02 17:37:46.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Martin Sigalow, Joseph Millman - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Stuyvesant KF - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,9 +1,0 @@ 1 -AC 2 --Radical Democracy 3 -NC 4 --Habeas Viscus 5 -1AR 6 --Dispo Bad Theory 7 --Everything 8 -2AR 9 --Theory - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Penn Round Robin
- Caselist.RoundClass[44]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -46 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-02 17:38:14.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Chris Castillo, Jenn Melin - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Westwood RS - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,7 +1,0 @@ 1 -AC 2 --Radical Democracy 3 -NC 4 --Cap K 5 --Spec CPS 6 -NR 7 --Both - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -King Round Robin
- Caselist.RoundClass[45]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -47 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-02 17:38:19.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Chris Castillo, Jenn Melin - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Westwood RS - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,7 +1,0 @@ 1 -AC 2 --Radical Democracy 3 -NC 4 --Cap K 5 --Spec CPS 6 -NR 7 --Both - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -King Round Robin
- Caselist.RoundClass[46]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -48 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-15 22:50:00.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Mathew Pregasen, Andrew Monagle, Kathy Wang - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Success Academy SC - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Semis - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,13 +1,0 @@ 1 -AC 2 --Faculty Plan 3 -NC 4 --T Any 5 --Not Preffing Alston is Racist K 6 --Black Safe Spaces DA 7 --White People PIC 8 --Liberation Strat ROB 9 -1AR 10 --T Bad 11 --Everything 12 -NR 13 --Alston K - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harrison Round Robin
- Caselist.RoundClass[47]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -49 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-28 15:10:39.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All
- Caselist.RoundClass[48]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -50 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-29 17:33:15.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Paul Zhou - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Collegiate KY - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,6 +1,0 @@ 1 -AC 2 --Covert Racism 3 -NC 4 --Wilderson 5 -1AR 6 --Evans K - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -TOC
- Caselist.RoundClass[49]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -51 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-29 22:43:49.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oliver Roth - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -WDM Valley EM - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,4 +1,0 @@ 1 -AC 2 --Radical Democracy 3 -NC 4 --Physics Performance - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -TOC
- Caselist.CitesClass[4]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,3 @@ 1 +Hey! If you need cites for something, or want to know anything more specific, feel free to contact me either through email or Facebook 2 +Email: raffipiliero@aol.com 3 +Facebook: Cater Piliero - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-09-10 17:43:10.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harrison Piliero Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 - Contact - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All
- Caselist.CitesClass[24]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,19 @@ 1 +A. Interpretation: The neg may not read arguments that lead the judge to auto negate ~-~- to clarify, they can't make the presumption trigger on the framework or the auto negate argument on the plan text 2 + 3 +A. Interpretation: If the neg reads theory on a link of omission (i.e., something I did not specify) they must clarify in CX 4 + 5 +A. Interpretation: The neg may not read more than 5 NIBs and a counter burden and a counter role of the ballot 6 + 7 +A. Interpretation: The neg may not read an advocacy that defends banning nuclear power in all countries but one. To clarify, they can read PICs, but not this specific one. 8 + 9 +A. Interpretation: The neg may not theoretically justify util, say extinction precludes under all theories, and justify epistemic modesty. 10 + 11 + 12 + 13 +A. Interpretation: The negative may not read a burden that they concede is not sufficient, and also read theory that denies the Aff the RVI 14 + 15 +A. Interpretation: The negative may not read an advocacy of consulting indigenous people if its conditional, and they fiat that states don't intervene in consultation. 16 + 17 +A. Interpretation: All advocacies must be unconditional 18 + 19 +A. Interpretation: All reps arguments must be unconditional - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-19 14:24:52.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +- - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +- - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +22 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harrison Piliero Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 - Broken Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Sept-Oct
- Caselist.CitesClass[41]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,129 @@ 1 +====Part 1: Framework==== 2 + 3 +====THE ORWELLIAN NIGHTMARE HAS COME TRUE – Trump’s here to stay, and the militarized right is taking over – resistance is key now more than ever. The Role of the Judge is to Promote Critical Education, which means they must enhance our potential to fight dominant, oppressive social biases.==== 4 + 5 +Giroux 1: Giroux, Henry A. Waterbury Chair Professor, Pennsylvania State University “War Culture, Militarism, and Racist violence Under Trump.” Truthout, December 2016. RP 6 + 7 +With Donald Trump’s 8 +AND 9 + is too late. 10 + 11 +====The Role of the Ballot is to Endorse the Better Method for Critically Empowering Students. Critical empowerment exists when we have the skills to question and attack the status quo – this is key to any movement against oppression.==== 12 + 13 +Giroux 2: Giroux, Henry A. Waterbury Chair Professor, Pennsylvania State University “Radical Politics in the Age of American Authoritarianism: Connecting the Dots.” Truthout, April 2016. RP 14 + 15 +At the root 16 +AND 17 +democratic liberation movement. 18 + 19 + 20 +====Debate should deal with real-world consequences; ideal theories legitimize oppression by ignoring its concrete manifestations.==== 21 + 22 +Curry: Curry, Tommy J. Ph.D., Associate Professor of Philosophy, Texas A and M University “The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century.” Victory Briefs, 2014. CH 23 + 24 +Despite the pronouncement 25 +AND 26 +before abstraction occurs.5 27 + 28 +====Part 2: Kept on the Inside==== 29 + 30 +====CAMPUS SPEECH IS UNDER ATTACK FROM EVERY DIRECTION – demagogues use codes to stifle and make students sit down and shut up. They keep students ignorant so they don’t even question these practices.==== 31 + 32 +Friedersdorf: Friedersdorf, Conor Friedersdorf is a staff writer at The Atlantic, where he focuses on politics and national affairs. He lives in Venice, California, and is the founding editor of The Best of Journalism, a newsletter devoted to exceptional nonfiction. “The Glaring Evidence That Free Speech Is Threatened on Campus .” The Atlantic. March 2016. RP 33 + 34 +Here’s one: Many 35 +AND 36 +threats to speech. 37 + 38 +====And hate speech is getting worse in the status quo, despite the existence of speech codes.==== 39 + 40 +Long ’17: Long, Katherine. Journalist, Seattle Times “UW on Edge Over Perception of Rise in Hate Speech.” The Seattle Times, January 27, 2017. RP 41 + 42 +More than a 43 +AND 44 + and feeling futile.” 45 + 46 +====Both globally and domestically, speech codes worsen hate and target minorities – empirics prove.==== 47 + 48 +Strossen 1: Strossen, Nadine. John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law, New York Law School “Incitement to Hatred: Should There Be a Limit?” Southern Illinois University Law Journal, Vol. 25, 2001. RP 49 + 50 +Based on actual 51 +AND 52 + to disempowered groups. 53 + 54 +====Indeed, the type of speech being censored doesn’t matter. The question isn’t whether all speech is good, but whether colleges have the right to define which speech stays and which goes.==== 55 + 56 +Glasser: Glasser, Ira. Former Executive Director, American Civil Liberties Union Quoted in Jonathan Haidt’s “Hate Speech is Free Speech.” Spiked-online.com, June 12, 2016. RP 57 + 58 +How is ‘hate 59 +AND 60 + back on us. 61 + 62 +====And all speech codes are arbitrary and reify state power, even if a particular type of speech is bad – exceptions are modeled and undermine free speech.==== 63 + 64 +White: White, Ken. Criminal Defense Lawyer, Brown, White, and Newhouse “Lawsplainer: Why Flag Burning Matters, And How it Relates To Crush Videos.” Popehat, November 2016. RP 65 + 66 +In free speech 67 +AND 68 +right it is. 69 + 70 + 71 +====Advocacy: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. This makes them agents of inaction – they aren’t allowed to restrict speech.==== 72 + 73 +====Part 3: Let the Words Fall Out==== 74 + 75 +====Deregulating campus speech sets legal precedents that enable movements and protests, even if it protects bigots – Civil Rights prove.==== 76 + 77 +ACLU: The American Civil Liberties Union. “Hate Speech on Campus,” American Civil Liberties Union, 2016. BE 78 + 79 +A: Free speech 80 +AND 81 +of the peace." 82 + 83 +====Indeed, the question isn’t whether all speech is good, but who should regulate it: administrators, or students themselves. Non-legal remedies like shunning are designed to deter harmful speech.==== 84 + 85 +Etzioni: Etzioni, Amitai. Director of the Institute for Communitarian Policy Studies, George Washington University The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities, and the Communitarian Agenda. New York: Crown Publishers, Inc., 1993. CH 86 + 87 +Thus it might 88 + AND 89 + offended by them. 90 + 91 +====Affirming promotes radical protests that don’t rely on traditional speech.==== 92 + 93 +Johnston: Johnston, Angus. Writer, Rolling Stone “There's No College P.C. Crisis: In Defense of Student Protesters.” Rolling Stone, December 2015. RP 94 + 95 +The demographics of 96 +AND 97 +, and stern rebuke." 98 + 99 +====In fact, actually achieving radical change requires the freedom to protest – protests empirically achieved civil rights, military reform, economic justice, and more.==== 100 + 101 +Gay: Gay, Roxanne. Contributor, New Republic “Student Activism Is Serious Business.” New Republic, November 2015. RP 102 + 103 +Of late, there 104 +AND 105 + came before them. 106 +====Beyond that, free speech means students reclaim public spaces from racist institutions and create a cultural change.==== 107 + 108 +Block: Block, Jim. Professor of Political Theory and Political Culture, DePaul University “The Legacy and Promise of the Free Speech Movement.” Popular Resistance, October 2014. RP 109 + 110 +This past weekend 111 +AND 112 + conformist American lifestyle. 113 + 114 +====Speech codes drive oppression underground – students can’t mobilize against racism if they never see it.==== 115 + 116 +Calleros: Calleros, Charles R. Professor of Law, Arizona State University “Paternalism, Counterspeech, and Campus Hate-Speech Codes.” Arizona State Law Journal, Winter 1995. RP 117 + 118 + 119 +One cannot eliminate 120 +AND 121 + at every turn. 122 + 123 +====Narrow campus codes against Constitutionally unprotected speech solve for hate speech and other undesirable speech.==== 124 + 125 +Johnson: Johnson, Catherine B. J.D. Candidate, Fordham University School of Law, 2001 “Stopping Hate Without Stifling Speech: Re-examining the Merits of Hate Speech Codes on University Campuses.” Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol. 27, Issue 6, 1999. CH 126 + 127 +In drafting such 128 +AND 129 + speech should prevail.” - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-25 14:32:19.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Chris Castillo, Jenn Melin - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Westwood RS - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +39 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harrison Piliero Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JANFEB - Radical Democracy v6 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +King Round Robin
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-09-10 17:43:08.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All
- Caselist.RoundClass[22]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +24 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-19 14:24:51.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +- - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +- - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Sept-Oct
- Caselist.RoundClass[39]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +41 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-25 14:32:17.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Chris Castillo, Jenn Melin - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Westwood RS - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,7 @@ 1 +AC 2 +-Radical Democracy 3 +NC 4 +-Cap K 5 +-Spec CPS 6 +NR 7 +-Both - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +King Round Robin