Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[39]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[41]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[39]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-03-25 14:32:17.869
	1	+2017-03-25 14:32:17.0

Caselist.CitesClass[41]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,129 @@
	1	+====Part 1: Framework====
	2	+
	3	+====THE ORWELLIAN NIGHTMARE HAS COME TRUE – Trump’s here to stay, and the militarized right is taking over – resistance is key now more than ever. The Role of the Judge is to Promote Critical Education, which means they must enhance our potential to fight dominant, oppressive social biases.====
	4	+
	5	+Giroux 1: Giroux, Henry A. Waterbury Chair Professor, Pennsylvania State University “War Culture, Militarism, and Racist violence Under Trump.” Truthout, December 2016. RP
	6	+
	7	+With Donald Trump’s
	8	+AND
	9	+ is too late.
	10	+
	11	+====The Role of the Ballot is to Endorse the Better Method for Critically Empowering Students. Critical empowerment exists when we have the skills to question and attack the status quo – this is key to any movement against oppression.====
	12	+
	13	+Giroux 2: Giroux, Henry A. Waterbury Chair Professor, Pennsylvania State University “Radical Politics in the Age of American Authoritarianism: Connecting the Dots.” Truthout, April 2016. RP
	14	+
	15	+At the root
	16	+AND
	17	+democratic liberation movement.
	18	+
	19	+
	20	+====Debate should deal with real-world consequences; ideal theories legitimize oppression by ignoring its concrete manifestations.====
	21	+
	22	+Curry: Curry, Tommy J. Ph.D., Associate Professor of Philosophy, Texas A and M University “The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century.” Victory Briefs, 2014. CH
	23	+
	24	+Despite the pronouncement
	25	+AND
	26	+before abstraction occurs.5
	27	+
	28	+====Part 2: Kept on the Inside====
	29	+
	30	+====CAMPUS SPEECH IS UNDER ATTACK FROM EVERY DIRECTION – demagogues use codes to stifle and make students sit down and shut up. They keep students ignorant so they don’t even question these practices.====
	31	+
	32	+Friedersdorf: Friedersdorf, Conor Friedersdorf is a staff writer at The Atlantic, where he focuses on politics and national affairs. He lives in Venice, California, and is the founding editor of The Best of Journalism, a newsletter devoted to exceptional nonfiction. “The Glaring Evidence That Free Speech Is Threatened on Campus .” The Atlantic. March 2016. RP
	33	+
	34	+Here’s one: Many
	35	+AND
	36	+threats to speech.
	37	+
	38	+====And hate speech is getting worse in the status quo, despite the existence of speech codes.====
	39	+
	40	+Long ’17: Long, Katherine. Journalist, Seattle Times “UW on Edge Over Perception of Rise in Hate Speech.” The Seattle Times, January 27, 2017. RP
	41	+
	42	+More than a
	43	+AND
	44	+ and feeling futile.”
	45	+
	46	+====Both globally and domestically, speech codes worsen hate and target minorities – empirics prove.====
	47	+
	48	+Strossen 1: Strossen, Nadine. John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law, New York Law School “Incitement to Hatred: Should There Be a Limit?” Southern Illinois University Law Journal, Vol. 25, 2001. RP
	49	+
	50	+Based on actual
	51	+AND
	52	+ to disempowered groups.
	53	+
	54	+====Indeed, the type of speech being censored doesn’t matter. The question isn’t whether all speech is good, but whether colleges have the right to define which speech stays and which goes.====
	55	+
	56	+Glasser: Glasser, Ira. Former Executive Director, American Civil Liberties Union Quoted in Jonathan Haidt’s “Hate Speech is Free Speech.” Spiked-online.com, June 12, 2016. RP
	57	+
	58	+How is ‘hate
	59	+AND
	60	+ back on us.
	61	+
	62	+====And all speech codes are arbitrary and reify state power, even if a particular type of speech is bad – exceptions are modeled and undermine free speech.====
	63	+
	64	+White: White, Ken. Criminal Defense Lawyer, Brown, White, and Newhouse “Lawsplainer: Why Flag Burning Matters, And How it Relates To Crush Videos.” Popehat, November 2016. RP
	65	+
	66	+In free speech
	67	+AND
	68	+right it is.
	69	+
	70	+
	71	+====Advocacy: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. This makes them agents of inaction – they aren’t allowed to restrict speech.====
	72	+
	73	+====Part 3: Let the Words Fall Out====
	74	+
	75	+====Deregulating campus speech sets legal precedents that enable movements and protests, even if it protects bigots – Civil Rights prove.====
	76	+
	77	+ACLU: The American Civil Liberties Union. “Hate Speech on Campus,” American Civil Liberties Union, 2016. BE
	78	+
	79	+A: Free speech
	80	+AND
	81	+of the peace."
	82	+
	83	+====Indeed, the question isn’t whether all speech is good, but who should regulate it: administrators, or students themselves. Non-legal remedies like shunning are designed to deter harmful speech.====
	84	+
	85	+Etzioni: Etzioni, Amitai. Director of the Institute for Communitarian Policy Studies, George Washington University The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities, and the Communitarian Agenda. New York: Crown Publishers, Inc., 1993. CH
	86	+
	87	+Thus it might
	88	+ AND
	89	+ offended by them.
	90	+
	91	+====Affirming promotes radical protests that don’t rely on traditional speech.====
	92	+
	93	+Johnston: Johnston, Angus. Writer, Rolling Stone “There's No College P.C. Crisis: In Defense of Student Protesters.” Rolling Stone, December 2015. RP
	94	+
	95	+The demographics of
	96	+AND
	97	+, and stern rebuke."
	98	+
	99	+====In fact, actually achieving radical change requires the freedom to protest – protests empirically achieved civil rights, military reform, economic justice, and more.====
	100	+
	101	+Gay: Gay, Roxanne. Contributor, New Republic “Student Activism Is Serious Business.” New Republic, November 2015. RP
	102	+
	103	+Of late, there
	104	+AND
	105	+ came before them.
	106	+====Beyond that, free speech means students reclaim public spaces from racist institutions and create a cultural change.====
	107	+
	108	+Block: Block, Jim. Professor of Political Theory and Political Culture, DePaul University “The Legacy and Promise of the Free Speech Movement.” Popular Resistance, October 2014. RP
	109	+
	110	+This past weekend
	111	+AND
	112	+ conformist American lifestyle.
	113	+
	114	+====Speech codes drive oppression underground – students can’t mobilize against racism if they never see it.====
	115	+
	116	+Calleros: Calleros, Charles R. Professor of Law, Arizona State University “Paternalism, Counterspeech, and Campus Hate-Speech Codes.” Arizona State Law Journal, Winter 1995. RP
	117	+
	118	+
	119	+One cannot eliminate
	120	+AND
	121	+ at every turn.
	122	+
	123	+====Narrow campus codes against Constitutionally unprotected speech solve for hate speech and other undesirable speech.====
	124	+
	125	+Johnson: Johnson, Catherine B. J.D. Candidate, Fordham University School of Law, 2001 “Stopping Hate Without Stifling Speech: Re-examining the Merits of Hate Speech Codes on University Campuses.” Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol. 27, Issue 6, 1999. CH
	126	+
	127	+In drafting such
	128	+AND
	129	+ speech should prevail.”

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-03-25 14:32:19.309

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Chris Castillo, Jenn Melin

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Westwood RS

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+39

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harrison Piliero Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JANFEB - Radical Democracy v6

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+King Round Robin