| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,126 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Part 1 is the Framework=== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+====People are inherently equal at birth, so systemic exclusion of particular groups arbitrarily denies due.==== |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+Winter and Leighton: Winter, Deborah DuNann Professor of Psychology, Whitman College, and Dana C. Leighton, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Psychology, Southern Arkansas University. “Peace, Conflict, and Violence: Peace Psychology in the 21st Century.” New York: Prentice Hall, 2001. BE |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+Finally, to recognize |
|
8 |
+AND |
|
9 |
+building lasting peace. |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+====We should address material conditions of violence first.==== |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+Pappas: Pappas, Gregory Fernando. Texas AandM University “The Pragmatists’ Approach to Injustice.” The Pluralist, Volume 11, Number 1, Spring 2016. BE |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+In Experience and |
|
17 |
+AND |
|
18 |
+to each patient. |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+====The standard is Promoting Social Equality.==== |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+====Prefer additionally – ==== |
|
24 |
+====1 Equality is key to any ends based theory – goods have diminishing marginal utility.==== |
|
25 |
+Hooker: Hooker, Brad. Philosophy Professor, University of Reading “Ideal Code, Real World,” 2003. CH |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+Now imagine a |
|
28 |
+AND |
|
29 |
+phenomenon is important. |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+===2 States can’t focus on abstract, overarching theories==== |
|
32 |
+Raz: Raz, Joseph Faculty, Columbia Law School “Multiculturalism: A Liberal Perspective.” Multiculturalism. Winter 1994. RP |
|
33 |
+Political philosophy does |
|
34 |
+AND |
|
35 |
+heading for disaster. |
|
36 |
+ |
|
37 |
+ |
|
38 |
+Part 2: Kept on the Inside |
|
39 |
+Speech codes make students SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP. |
|
40 |
+Ahmari: Ahmari, Sohrab. Assistant Books Editor, The Wall Street Journal “How Free Speech Died on Campus.” The Wall Street Journal, November 16, 2012. BE |
|
41 |
+ |
|
42 |
+At Northeastern University, |
|
43 |
+AND |
|
44 |
+means protecting dissenters." |
|
45 |
+ |
|
46 |
+In fact, ANY speech restrictions have a spillover effect, silencing dissent. |
|
47 |
+Strossen 1: Strossen, Nadine. John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law, New York Law School “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?” Duke Law Journal, 484-573, 1990. BE |
|
48 |
+ |
|
49 |
+The experience with |
|
50 |
+AND |
|
51 |
+ and worth revering.191 |
|
52 |
+ |
|
53 |
+Worse, the speech codes door swings both ways, targeting the very people they claim to help |
|
54 |
+ACLU 1: The American Civil Liberties Union. “Hate Speech on Campus,” American Civil Liberties Union, 2016. RP |
|
55 |
+A: Historically, defamation |
|
56 |
+AND |
|
57 |
+we'll be next." |
|
58 |
+ |
|
59 |
+ |
|
60 |
+And the “for me, but not for thee” approach to free speech BACKFIRES by mobilizing the alt-right |
|
61 |
+Carle: Carle, Robert. Professor of Theology, the King’s College, New York “How the American Academy Helped Create the Alt-Right.” The Federalist, December 2016. RP |
|
62 |
+ |
|
63 |
+American academics are |
|
64 |
+AND |
|
65 |
+of ideological conformity.” |
|
66 |
+ |
|
67 |
+This dooms ANY alternatives to the squo to failure |
|
68 |
+ |
|
69 |
+Godrej: Godrej, Farah. Professor of Political Science, UC Riverdale “Neoliberalism, Militarization, and the Price of Dissent.” The Imperial University: Academic Repression and Scholarly Dissent. University of Minnesota Press, 2014. RP |
|
70 |
+ |
|
71 |
+In this chapter, |
|
72 |
+AND |
|
73 |
+be in question. |
|
74 |
+ |
|
75 |
+Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech |
|
76 |
+Kurtz: Kurtz, Stanley. Contributor, National Review “A Plan to Restore Free Speech on Campus.” The Corner, December 2015. RP |
|
77 |
+ |
|
78 |
+First: Colleges and |
|
79 |
+AND |
|
80 |
+pre-existing speech codes. |
|
81 |
+ |
|
82 |
+Part 3: Let the Words Fall Out |
|
83 |
+Deregulating campus speech sets valuable legal precedents. |
|
84 |
+ |
|
85 |
+ACLU 2: The American Civil Liberties Union. “Hate Speech on Campus,” American Civil Liberties Union, 2016. BE |
|
86 |
+ |
|
87 |
+A: Free speech |
|
88 |
+AND |
|
89 |
+of the peace." |
|
90 |
+ |
|
91 |
+And only OPEN DIALOGUE gets students to demand liberation THEMSELVES |
|
92 |
+ |
|
93 |
+DeBrabander: DeBrabander, Firmin. Associate Professor of Philosophy, Maryland Institute College of Art “Do Guns Make Us Free?: Democracy and the Armed Society.” Yale University Press, May 19, 2015. BE |
|
94 |
+ |
|
95 |
+The famed education |
|
96 |
+AND |
|
97 |
+be lectured to. |
|
98 |
+ |
|
99 |
+Meanwhile, speech codes DEMOBILIZE ACTION |
|
100 |
+Strossen 2: Strossen, Nadine. John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law, New York Law School “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?” Duke Law Journal, 484-573, 1990. BE |
|
101 |
+ |
|
102 |
+There is a |
|
103 |
+AND |
|
104 |
+follow from it.39 5 |
|
105 |
+ |
|
106 |
+In fact, free speech is key to students learning to REJECT oppressive views. |
|
107 |
+Leonard: Leonard, James. Professor of Law, Ohio Northern University “Killing with Kindness: Speech Codes in the American University.” Ohio Northern University Law Review. Volume 19, 1993. RP |
|
108 |
+ |
|
109 |
+Perhaps the archetypal |
|
110 |
+AND |
|
111 |
+has aged well. |
|
112 |
+ |
|
113 |
+Speech codes are ineffective at solving hate speech |
|
114 |
+A Psychological evidence and Britain proves |
|
115 |
+Strossen: Strossen, Nadine. John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law, New York Law School “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?” Duke Law Journal, 484-573, 1990. BE |
|
116 |
+ |
|
117 |
+First, there is |
|
118 |
+AND |
|
119 |
+the United States.364 |
|
120 |
+ |
|
121 |
+B They glorify oppressive speakers, creating martyrdom. |
|
122 |
+Strossen: Strossen, Nadine. John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law, New York Law School “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?” Duke Law Journal, 484-573, 1990. BE |
|
123 |
+ |
|
124 |
+A second reason |
|
125 |
+AND |
|
126 |
+ protect such speech. 390 |