Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[33]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[35]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[33]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-01-12 19:06:54.712
	1	+2017-01-12 19:06:54.0

Caselist.CitesClass[35]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,115 @@
	1	+====Part 1 is the Framework====
	2	+====The Role of the Judge is to Promote Critical Thinking====
	3	+====Status quo actors use violence to smother critical thought.====
	4	+Giroux 1: Giroux, Henry. Waterbury Chair Professor, Pennsylvania State University "The Curse of Totalitarianism and the Challenge of Critical Pedagogy." Philosophersforchange.org, October 13, 2015. BE
	5	+
	6	+The forces of
	7	+AND
	8	+a vibrant democracy.
	9	+
	10	+====The Role of the Ballot is to Endorse the More Productive Liberation Strategy for the Oppressed.====
	11	+
	12	+Liberation requires bottom-up, not top-down solutions====
	13	+Sharp: Sharp, Gene. Founder, Albert Einstein Institution “Self-Liberation: A Guide to Strategic Planning for Action to End a Dictatorship or Other Oppression.” Albert Einstein Institution, 2009. CH
	14	+
	15	+In contrast, a
	16	+AND
	17	+responsibility and freedom.
	18	+
	19	+====Part 2: Kept on the Inside====
	20	+
	21	+====Speech codes make students SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP.====
	22	+Ahmari: Ahmari, Sohrab. Assistant Books Editor, The Wall Street Journal “How Free Speech Died on Campus.” The Wall Street Journal, November 16, 2012. BE
	23	+
	24	+At Northeastern University,
	25	+AND
	26	+means protecting dissenters."
	27	+
	28	+====In fact, ANY speech restrictions have a spillover effect, silencing dissent.====
	29	+Strossen 1: Strossen, Nadine. John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law, New York Law School “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?” Duke Law Journal, 484-573, 1990. BE
	30	+
	31	+The experience with
	32	+AND
	33	+ and worth revering.191
	34	+
	35	+====Worse, the speech codes door swings both ways, targeting the very people they claim to help====
	36	+ACLU 1: The American Civil Liberties Union. “Hate Speech on Campus,” American Civil Liberties Union, 2016. RP
	37	+A: Historically, defamation
	38	+AND
	39	+we'll be next."
	40	+
	41	+====And the “for me, but not for thee” approach to free speech BACKFIRES by mobilizing the alt-right====
	42	+
	43	+Carle: Carle, Robert. Professor of Theology, the King’s College, New York “How the American Academy Helped Create the Alt-Right.” The Federalist, December 2016. RP
	44	+
	45	+American academics are
	46	+AND
	47	+of ideological conformity.”
	48	+
	49	+===This dooms ANY alternatives to the squo to failure====
	50	+
	51	+Godrej: Godrej, Farah. Professor of Political Science, UC Riverdale “Neoliberalism, Militarization, and the Price of Dissent.” The Imperial University: Academic Repression and Scholarly Dissent. University of Minnesota Press, 2014. RP
	52	+
	53	+In this chapter,
	54	+AND
	55	+be in question.
	56	+
	57	+
	58	+
	59	+
	60	+====Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech====
	61	+
	62	+Kurtz: Kurtz, Stanley. Contributor, National Review “A Plan to Restore Free Speech on Campus.” The Corner, December 2015. RP
	63	+
	64	+First: Colleges and
	65	+AND
	66	+pre-existing speech codes.
	67	+
	68	+====Part 3: Let the Words Fall Out====
	69	+
	70	+====Deregulating campus speech sets valuable legal precedents.====
	71	+ACLU 2: The American Civil Liberties Union. “Hate Speech on Campus,” American Civil Liberties Union, 2016. BE
	72	+
	73	+A: Free speech
	74	+AND
	75	+of the peace."
	76	+
	77	+===And only OPEN DIALOGUE gets students to demand liberation THEMSELVES====
	78	+DeBrabander: DeBrabander, Firmin. Associate Professor of Philosophy, Maryland Institute College of Art “Do Guns Make Us Free?: Democracy and the Armed Society.” Yale University Press, May 19, 2015. BE
	79	+
	80	+
	81	+The famed education
	82	+AND
	83	+be lectured to.
	84	+
	85	+====Meanwhile, speech codes DEMOBILIZE ACTION====
	86	+Strossen 2: Strossen, Nadine. John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law, New York Law School “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?” Duke Law Journal, 484-573, 1990. BE
	87	+
	88	+
	89	+There is a
	90	+AND
	91	+follow from it.39 5
	92	+
	93	+====In fact, free speech is key to students learning to REJECT oppressive views.====
	94	+
	95	+Leonard: Leonard, James. Professor of Law, Ohio Northern University “Killing with Kindness: Speech Codes in the American University.” Ohio Northern University Law Review. Volume 19, 1993. RP
	96	+
	97	+
	98	+Perhaps the archetypal
	99	+AND
	100	+has aged well.
	101	+
	102	+====Speech codes are ineffective at solving hate speech====
	103	+====A Psychological evidence and Britain proves====
	104	+Strossen: Strossen, Nadine. John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law, New York Law School “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?” Duke Law Journal, 484-573, 1990. BE
	105	+
	106	+First, there is
	107	+AND
	108	+the United States.364
	109	+
	110	+====B They glorify oppressive speakers, creating martyrdom.====
	111	+Strossen: Strossen, Nadine. John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law, New York Law School “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?” Duke Law Journal, 484-573, 1990. BE
	112	+
	113	+A second reason
	114	+AND
	115	+ protect such speech. 390

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-01-12 19:06:57.199

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Chris Randall, Joseph Flores

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Lynbrook HW

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+33

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harrison Piliero Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JANFEB - Radical Democracy AC V2

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harvard Westlake RR