Changes for page Harrison Piliero Aff
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:35
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[28]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-11-15 21:35:47. 9111 +2016-11-15 21:35:47.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[30]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,142 @@ 1 +====I value Just State Action==== 2 + 3 +====Recognizing self-awareness is the basis of all philosophy.==== 4 + 5 +Wood 1: Allen W. Wood. "Fichte's Philosophy of Right and Ethics," forthcoming in Günter Zöller (ed). The Cambridge Companion to Fichte. New York: Cambridge University Press. CH 6 + 7 + 8 +Fichte's Wissenschaftslehre is 9 +AND 10 +latter "real" activity (GA I/2:402-404. SK 236-238). 11 + 12 +====We recognize others’ freedom and choices.==== 13 + 14 +Wood 2: Allen W. Wood. "Fichte's Philosophy of Right and Ethics," forthcoming in Günter Zöller (ed). The Cambridge Companion to Fichte. New York: Cambridge University Press. CH 15 + 16 +The condition for 17 +AND 18 +the external world (GA I/3:409). 19 + 20 + 21 +====Thus, the standard is Respecting Moral Agency.==== 22 + 23 +====Prefer this standard, since:==== 24 +====1 People need agency to achieve other goods.==== 25 + 26 + 27 +Kuhler 1: Kuhler, Michael. “Autonomy and The Self,” Wilhelms University, Munster, November 2010. SR 28 + 29 +Surely, there are 30 +AND 31 +precedes the self. 32 + 33 +====2 Respecting agency recognizes distinct groups’ needs ==== 34 + 35 +Fraser: Fraser, Nancy. Professor on the Graduate Faculty of Political and Social Science, New School for Social Research “Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation.” The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Stanford University, April 30-May 2, 1996. CH 36 + 37 +For practical purposes, 38 +AND 39 +do distributive inequities. 40 + 41 + 42 + 43 +====I advocate that the United States federal government ought to limit qualified immunity, or “QI,” for police officers.==== 44 + 45 +Wright shows: Wright, Sam. Public Interest Lawyer “Want to Fight Police Misconduct? Reform Qualified Immunity.” Above the Law, Nov. 2015. MZ 46 + 47 +To bring about 48 +AND 49 +in the courts? 50 + 51 +====Advantage 1: Giving Voice to Victims==== 52 + 53 + 54 +====U.S. police show racism==== 55 +Makarechi: Makarechi, Kia. Senior Editor of Mobile and Innovations, The Huffington Post “What the Data Really Says About Police and Racial Bias.” Vanity Fair, July 14, 2016. CH 56 + 57 +1. A study 58 +AND 59 +searched without consent. 60 + 61 +====Yet QI typically protects those who commit misconduct==== 62 + 63 +Bernick 1: Bernick, Evan Contributor, Foundation for Economic Education “To Hold Police Accountable, Don’t Give Them Immunity.” Foundation for Economic Education. April 2015. RP 64 + 65 + 66 +But for decades, 67 +AND 68 +“shall be liable.” 69 + 70 +====QI denies their status as moral agents. ”==== 71 + 72 +Temple Law: Temple Law. “Accountability for Government Misconduct: Limiting Qualified Immunity and the Good Faith Defense.” Temple Law Review, Vol. 49, 1976. MZ 73 + 74 +No matter what 75 +AND 76 +of civil liberties. 77 + 78 +====Turning away is a form of complicity .==== 79 +Kahn: Kahn, DT. “Bystander Intervention and Norm Shifting: A Social Psychological Research Overview,” 2011. EB 80 + 81 +In order to 82 +AND 83 +illustrated in Figure 1. 84 + 85 +====The aff gives victims agency ==== 86 + 87 +Wright: Wright, Sam. Contributor, Above the Law “Want to Fight Police Misconduct? Reform Qualified Immunity.” Above the Law, November 2015. RP 88 + 89 +As usual, I’ve 90 +AND 91 +needs to change. 92 + 93 +====Civil suits uniquely recognize all ==== 94 + 95 +Nixa: Nixa, Dan. Civil Rights Attorney “On the Importance of Civil Rights Lawsuits.” Chicagocivilrightslaw.com, May 6, 2016. CH 96 + 97 +While civil rights 98 +AND 99 + we are now. 100 + 101 +====Advantage 2: Destroying Double-Standards==== 102 + 103 + 104 +====QI gives police an excuse for participating in injustices==== 105 + 106 +Heller: Heller, Jacob. J.D. Candidate, Stanford Law School “Abominable Acts.” Vermont Law Review, Vol. 34:311, 2010. LC 107 + 108 + 109 +In these cases, 110 +AND 111 +of civilized law. 112 + 113 +====Indeed, QI sets a precedent that absolves people moral duties.==== 114 + 115 +Grigg: Grigg, William N. Contributor, Pro Libertate “‘Qualified Immunity’ – A License to Commit Criminal Violence?” Pro Libertate, October 2013. RP 116 + 117 +There is no 118 +AND 119 +in other states. 120 + 121 +====Yet moral obligations transcend specific roles==== 122 + 123 +DeGeorge notes: De George, Richard T. University Distinguished Professor of Philosophy, University of Kansas Business Ethics. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1999. CH 124 + 125 +Because people are 126 +AND 127 +to be moral. 128 + 129 +====The aff exposes police misconduct==== 130 +Bernick 2: Bernick, Evan. Contributor, Foundation for Economic Education “To Hold Police Accountable, Don’t Give Them Immunity.” Foundation for Economic Education, April 2015. RP 131 + 132 +Qualified immunity shields 133 +AND 134 + needs to happen? 135 + 136 +====What matters is the ability to bring a suit, not the results.==== 137 + 138 +Armacost: Armacost, Barbara E. Associate Professor, University of Virginia School of Law “Qualified Immunity: Ignorance Excused.” Vanderbilt Law Review, 1998. RP 139 + 140 +Turning to section 141 +AND 142 +kinds of rights: - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-15 21:35:49.398 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Mark Ahlstrom, Daniel Lumpee - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Greenhill SK - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +28 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harrison Piliero Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NOVDEC - Role Morality AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Apple Valley RR