| ... |
... |
@@ -1,22
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-A. Text |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
-Countries/the aff actor ought to expand regulation of nuclear-related environmental injustice. This entails: |
| 4 |
|
-A mandating increased public education campaigns about nuclear radiation; |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
-B requiring nuclear corporations to increase stakeholder participation in siting discussions; and |
| 7 |
|
-C creating a 100-mile radius between reactors and inhabited areas. |
| 8 |
|
-B. Competition |
| 9 |
|
- |
| 10 |
|
-The CP is mutually exclusive with the aff, since “prohibit” means: |
| 11 |
|
-(“forbid”, dictionary.com, BE) |
| 12 |
|
- to forbid (an action, activity, etc.) by authority or law. |
| 13 |
|
- |
| 14 |
|
-The aff must defend forbidding NP production of nuclear power, but the CP allows it, so any perm is severance from the aff. |
| 15 |
|
-C. Solvency |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
-The CP solves the entire aff by reducing environmental injustice without banning the NP we need to stop warming. |
| 18 |
|
-Cousins notes: Cousins, Elicia Researcher, Carleton College, Claire Karban, Fay Li, and Marianna Zapanta. “Nuclear Power and Environmental Justice.” Carleton College, Environmental Studies Comprehensive Project, no date. RP |
| 19 |
|
- |
| 20 |
|
-From a Rawlsian |
| 21 |
|
-AND |
| 22 |
|
-nuclear power regulation. |