Changes for page Harker Vinod Aff
Summary
-
Attachments (0 modified, 2 added, 0 removed)
-
Objects (6 modified, 4 added, 3 removed)
Details
- Harker-Vinod-Aff-Harvard Westlake-Round2.docx
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +XWiki.21AditiV@studentsharkerorg - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +23.2 KB - Content
- Harker-Vinod-Aff-NDSA Nats MS-Round1.docx
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +XWiki.21AditiV@studentsharkerorg - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +68.6 KB - Content
- Caselist.CitesClass[1]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,165 +1,80 @@ 1 -=1AC =1 +=1AC= 2 2 3 3 4 -=== =I affirm.Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the US ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech.====4 +===ROB=== 5 5 6 6 7 -====T oclarify,here's a comprehensivelist of thingstheFirstAmendmentdoes not permit–obscenity,expression that causesinjury,andremarksthat causeviolence====8 - Ruane14(KathleenAnneRuane– LegislativeAttorney.HerreportwaspublishedbytheCongressional ResearchService,whichisabranchofgovernment, "FreedomofSpeech andPress:ExceptionstotheFirstAmendment", https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/95-815.pdf,pgs. 1-5, EmmieeM)9 - The FirstAmendment to theunitedStatesConstitution providesthat"Congressshall makeno7 +====The political process has changed – instead of trying to engage with society, we have become fixated on symbolic gestures and looking to personal ethics, leading to serial policy failure and the War on Terror. We need to engage with concrete action not 'me-search' and radical utopias. Thus the role of the ballot is to vote for the debater that best deconstructs the security state through policy action. ==== 8 +**Chandler 7** (David Chandler – Professor of International Relations and the Director of the Centre for the Study of Democracy at the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of Westminster. He's also the founding editor of the Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, "The Attraction of Post-Territorial Politics: Ethics and Activism in the International Sphere (The Inaugural Lecture of Professor David Chandler)", http://www.davidchandler.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Inaugural-lecture.pdf, pgs. 1-9, EmmieeM) 9 +Introduction. It seems that our engagement with and understanding of politics is increasingly shaped 10 10 AND 11 -c onstitutesa"true threat,"andnotagainstmere"political hyperbole."11 +, critique, and ultimately overcome the practices and subjectivities of our time. 12 12 13 13 14 -== Framework == 15 - 16 - 17 -====The standard is maximizing expected wellbeing as contextualized by impacts on case==== 18 - 19 - 20 -====Util is axiomatically true - all value stems from experienced wellbeing. Harris 10==== 21 -Sam Harris 2010. CEO Project Reason; PHD UCLA Neuroscience; BA Stanford Philosophy. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values." 22 -I believe that we will increasingly understand good and evil, right and wrong, 14 +====Thus, the plan. Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. ==== 15 +**Downs 4** (Donald Alexander Downs – Professor of Political Science, Law and Journalism at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, and Research Fellow at the Independent Institute, Oakland, California. He has won the Annisfield-Wolf Book Award, the Gladys M. Kammerer Award of the American Political Science Association, and has been in published in journals, encyclopedias, and professional books. "Restoring Free Speech and Liberty on Campus", pgs. Xx – xxi, http://www.thedivineconspiracy.org/Z5243N.pdf, EmmieeM) 16 +During most of the twentieth century, threats to campus free speech and academic freedom 23 23 AND 24 - ,therefore,consequences andconsciousstates remainthefoundationof allvalues.18 +commitment on campus can help to bring about this retrieval of liberal principles. 25 25 26 26 27 -====Death is the worst form of evil since it destroys the subject itself.==== 28 -**Paterson 03** – Department of Philosophy, Providence College, Rhode Island (Craig, "A Life Not Worth Living?", Studies in Christian Ethics. 29 -Contrary to those accounts, I would argue that it is death per se that 30 -AND 31 -the person, the very source and condition of all human possibility.82 21 +==Recognition== 32 32 33 33 34 -==== ==== 35 - 36 - 37 -==Innovation== 38 - 39 - 40 -====Restrictions on free speech are rapidly increasing, destroying the educational environment==== 41 -**Slater 16** (Tom Slator – editor of this book (it's a collection of essays from many different people). He also wrote the introduction from which this was cut. Deputy Editor of Spiked, runs Free Speech University Ratings, and has written for The Times/The Telegraph/Independent, "Unsafe Space: The Crisis of Free Speech on Campus", pgs. 2 - 3, https://books.google.com/books?hl=enandlr=andid=vdP7CwAAQBAJandoi=fndandpg=PP1anddq=college+speech+restrictions+risingandots=YBNOvRNy1Tandsig=BmpSFkTJts9QsI1YcDAjxmB6dpQ~~#v=onepageandq=college20speech20restrictions20risingandf=false, EmmieeM) 42 -Over the past few years, campus censorship has reached epidemic levels. In 2015 24 +====Colleges are the newest target of the security state – the perception that universities are uniquely capable of supporting democracy and dissent over the War on Terror and free enterprise drives right-wing extremists to enforce censorship, under the guise of advancing tolerance and rights==== 25 +**Giroux 6** (Henry A. Giroux – one of the founding theorists of critical pedagogy, PhD from Carnegie, was a professor at Boston University and scholar at Miami University. Was the founding Director of the Center for Education and Cultural Studies. Published by John Hopkins University Press, "Academic Freedom Under FIre: The Case for Critical Pedagogy, pgs. 1 – 9, http://muse.jhu.edu/article/203608/pdf, EmmieeM) 26 +Higher education in the United States appears to be caught in a strange contradiction. 43 43 AND 44 - dwell onthe easyargumentsanddefendonly themostsocially acceptabletargets.28 +the best talent to American universities" (Jonathan Cole 2005b, B7). 45 45 46 46 47 -====This hamstrings in novation—-universitiesrequirefreeexchange ofknowledgeas apre-requisitetoeducationandregulationsrisktransformingacademiesintoauthoritarian structures====48 -** ACTA13**(AmericanCouncilofTrustees andAlumni–independentnon-profit that isfocused onmaintainingacademicfreedomandaccountabilityamongUScolleges."Free toTeach, Freeto Learn:UnderstandingandMaintainingAcademicFreedominHigherEducation", pgs. 23-25, http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED560924.pdf, EmmieeM)49 - Theprimary function of auniversityisto discoveranddisseminateknowledge by means of31 +====The dissenter has become the terrorist to be eradicated – the security state has transformed college censorship into a tool of suppression for radical or brown students under the pretense of enforcing diversity and tolerance for right-wing students. Absent analysis of the War on Terror, liberation becomes impossible because struggles for racial or gender equality becomes coopted to further Islamaphobia and Middle East interventionism.==== 32 +**Chatterjee 14** (Piya Chatterjee – Gender and Woman's Studies Chair of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Department at Scripps; B.A. from Wellesley in Political Science/Anthropology; M.A. at UChicago in Political Science/Anthropology; PhD at UChicago in Anthropology; numerous awards (professor of the year, bridging theory to practice grant, ford foundation grant, etc); Sunandra Maira – Professor of Asian American studies at UC Davis; Ed.D in Human Development and Psychology from Harvard; "The Imperial University: Race, War, and the Nation-State", "Academic Contaiment" – entire section, pg. 17 – 25, https://www.csun.edu/cdsc/Imperial20University20Introduction20-20Piya20Chatterjee20and20Sunaina20Maira.pdf, "Academic Containment", EmmieeM) 33 +State warfare and militarism have shored up deeply powerful notions of patriotism, intertwined with 50 50 AND 51 - be leftto theinformal processesofsuasion,example, andargument.35 +the mission of higher education and the future of the nation-state. 52 52 53 53 54 -==== Free speechonpubliccollegesisakeyinternallinktoscientific discovery—-campus speechrestrictions allowsfor worseformsofcoercionthatskewsdataanda culture of opendebate iskeyto advancement====55 -** Economist16**("UnderAttack","TheInconvenientTruth",http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21699909-curbs-free-speech-are-growing-tighter-it-time-speak-out-under-attack, EmmieeM)56 - Intoleranceamong Western liberalsalsohaswhollyunintendedconsequences.Evendespotsknowthatlocking38 +====The security state operates on a binary where people are either complacent allies or dissenters to be suppressed at all costs – by framing unsavory speech acts as coming from people who are our equals and share more similarities than differences rather than evil "Others" to be destroyed, the affirmative avoids cooption of "protection" movements and the antagonisms that drive war. Anything other than complete rejection hyperlinks to the impacts of the AFF. ==== 39 +**Ivie 5** (Robert L. Ivie – PhD in Rhetoric and Communication at WashU, "Democratic Dissent and the Trick of Rhetorical Critique", "Dissent as a Form of Struggle" – entire section, pg. 279 – 280, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.832.4092andrep=rep1andtype=pdf, EmmieeM) 40 +Democracy's formidable challenge may be most clearly indicated on the occasion of war. War 57 57 AND 58 - Wintheargumentwithoutresortingtoforce. Andgrowatougherhide.42 +it is otherwise curtailed and constrained by a regime of crisis and war? 59 59 60 60 61 -==== Constantinnovationin the chemicalindustryiskeytocheckemergingdiseases====62 -** NRC2002**,~~NationalResearchCouncilCommitteeon Challengesfor ChemicalSciencesinthe21stcentury"NationalSecurityandHomelandDefense" http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK114822/)//a-berg63 - Many drugs areproducedbyeitherchemicalsynthesisorbiosyntheticprocesses. Recent advancesin45 +====Any form of free speech restrictions leads to massive overreach and censorship of minority movements – empirically proven==== 46 +**Gey 98** (Steven G. Gey – John W. and Ashley E. Frost Professor of Law, Florida State University College of Law, "Postmodern Censorship Revisited: A Reply to Richard Delgado", "Professor Delgado and the Problem of Government Overreaching" – partway through, EmmieeM) 47 +Professor Delgado responds to the problem of controlling the application of speech-regulation statues 64 64 AND 65 - themfortheirbiologicalactivities orfunctionsalsoremainsachallengetoindustry.49 +in a "deliberate, planned extermination or attempted extermination of a people." 66 66 67 67 68 -====Absent innovation, new pathogens guarantee extinction —- decreasing biodiversity means spread between hosts is easier which checks empirics and generic defense==== 69 -**Yule '13** 70 -(et al; Jeffrey V. Yule – Herbert McElveen Professor of Applied and Natural Sciences At the School of Biological Sciences, Louisiana Tech University, Published April 2^^nd^^ – Humanities 2013, 2, 147–159; doi:10.3390/h2020147) 71 -Since the 1940s, humans in industrialized nations have been relatively sheltered from the threat 52 +====Security thrives on insecurity – the state fabricates dangerous "Others" to justify endless warfare in order to sustain hegemony and the myth of perpetual threats. Any weighing calculus that fails to account for the invisible violence happening in the status quo is epistemologically flawed – only through acknowledging that the War on Terror is fueled by the torture and slaughter of ordinary citizens can we deconstruct securitization. ==== 53 +**McClintock 9** (Anne McClintock – B.A in English from University of Cape Town; M.Phil in Linguistics at the University of Cambridge; PhD in English Literature from Columbia; previous Associate Professor of Gender and Cultural Studies at Columbia"Paranoid Empire: Specters From Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib", pgs. 50-54, http://english110fall2014leroy.qwriting.qc.cuny.edu/files/2014/06/13.1.mcclintock.pdf, EmmieeM) 54 +The question is still open: what is the purpose of Guantanamo Bay? Is 72 72 AND 73 - not,and the potentialfailureof ourspecieshasconsiderablebiologicalimplications.56 +contradictory sites where imperial racism, sexuality, and gender catastrophically collide.11 74 74 75 75 76 -====Competitiveness is key to US dominance – we need to keep innovating faster to ensure economic prosperity and hegemony==== 77 -Segal 04 – Senior Fellow in China Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations 78 -~~Adam, Foreign Affairs, "Is America Losing Its Edge?" November / December 2004, http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20041101facomment83601/adam-segal/is-america-losing-its-edge.html~~ 79 -The United States' global primacy depends in large part on its ability to develop new 59 +====Free speech codes shut down campus criticism and replace it with government-approved propaganda – there's a massive spillover effect because journalism grads lose the ability to pursue controversial pieces and censorship becomes normalized==== 60 +**Sanders 6** (Chris Sanders – University of Arizona Law Review, "Censorship 101: Anti-Hazelwood Laws and the Preservation of Free Speech at Colleges and Universities", "Say no More: Hazelwood's Dangers For College Students' Free Expression" – through the end of "Too Much Freedom: How the Extension of Hazelwood to Universities Could Endanger the Future of the First Amendment", pgs. 171 – 173, https://www.law.ua.edu/pubs/lrarticles/Volume2058/Issue201/sanders.pdf , EmmieeM) 61 +Post-Hazelwood censorship disputes have not been limited to high schools; a number 80 80 AND 81 - ,theUnitedStatesmustgetbetteratfosteringtechnologicalentrepreneurshipathome.63 +" speech is nothing more than a distant memory from an earlier time. 82 82 83 83 84 -==== Loss ofcompetitivenessresultsingreatpowerconflict—retrenchment makeswarinevitableand ensures theUS wouldbedragged in – that causesyourhegbad impacts soit's tryordieforthe AFF====85 -** Khalilzad11**— Zalmay Khalilzad,Counselor at theCenter for StrategicandInternationalStudies,served as the United States ambassador to Afghanistan, Iraq, andthe United Nations duringthe presidencyof George W. Bush, servedas the director of policy planningat the Defense Department duringthe Presidencyof George H.W. Bush, holds a Ph.D. from the University of Chicago,2011 ("TheEconomy and National Security,"NationalReview, February8^^th^^,Available Online athttp://www.nationalreview.com/articles/print/259024, Accessed 02-08-2011)86 -T oday, economicand fiscal trendspose themost severelong-term threatto66 +====Discourse is a pre-requisite to change – relationships must first be made visible before reformation can occur==== 67 +**Wingenbach 11** (Ed, Notre Dame Government and international studies PhD, "Institutionalizing Agonistic Democracy," pg 190-198, https://books.google.com/books?id=7-8JrC64UgwCandprintsec=frontcover//LADI) 68 +Third, because Knops ignores the situated source of antagonism and the persistence of hegemony 87 87 AND 88 - leading theworld towardanew, dangerouseraof multi-polarity.70 +opened up to greater contestation, generosity, and active re-constitution. 89 89 90 90 91 -== Terror==73 +===Underview=== 92 92 93 93 94 -==== Collegescan serveasuniqueplacesthatpreventpeoplefrombecomingtrappedinechochambers,butcollegecensorshipis ruiningthat—- students arebecoming moreextremist, lessunderstanding,and convinced thattheyareatwarwith anevil"Other"====95 -** Lukianoff no date**(GregLukianoff–attorneyand CEO attheFoundationofIndividualRightsin Education(FIRE); published inWallStreetJournal, LA Times,NY Times, WashingtonPost, and manyothers;hasappearedon CBS EveningNews, NBC's Today Show,andmany others,"HowColleges Create the'ExpectationofConfirmation'","PolarizationandtheThickening Wallsof Our EchoChamber"–"Can CollegeHelp Break DowntheExpectationof Confirmation?",http://www.soamcontest.com/content/how-colleges-create-expectation-confirmation,EmmieeM)96 -I nhis2008book, TheBigSort:Why theClustering of Like-76 +====The affirmative is an act of carpentry – the world is a really messed up place, but you cannot deny the existence of 6 billion people who cannot survive absent infrastructure and networks that provide food, transportation, and medicine. Empty critiques and radical upheavals devoid of concrete proposals are incomprehensible, doomed to failure, and drive people towards reigning ideology==== 77 +**Bryant 12** — Levi R. Bryant, Professor of Philosophy at Collin College, holds a Ph.D. in Philosophy from Loyola University in Chicago, 2012 ("Underpants Gnomes: A Critique of the Academic Left," Larval Subjects—Levi R. Bryant's philosophy blog, November 11^^th^^, Available Online at http://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2012/11/11/underpants-gnomes-a-critique-of-the-academic-left/, Accessed 02-21-2014) 78 +I must be in a mood today–half irritated, half amused–because 97 97 AND 98 -to the bold questioning and uncomfortable discussions that intellectual and societal innovation demands. 99 - 100 - 101 -====Freedom of expression allows extremist viewpoints to be challenged through debate, which demonstrates their flaws and de-motivates others from adopting them — speech bans only lead to hostility, divided communities, and push-back, which exacerbates terrorism==== 102 -**Lombardi 15 **(Marco Lombardi – member of the Italian Team for Security, Terroristic Issues, and Managing Emergencies, which is a research department in the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Milan, "Countering Radicalisation and Violent Extremism Among Youth to Prevent Terrorism", https://books.google.com/books?id=_kAoBgAAQBAJandpg=PA3andlpg=PA3anddq=preventing+free+discussion+leads+to+extremismandsource=blandots=TJ8fW6700zandsig=Lz4MWuGl6LkEYxy5RdXBDrCAxfUandhl=enandsa=Xandved=0ahUKEwiq56aDsvTQAhUS1GMKHRNUBC4Q6AEIXzAN~~#v=onepageandq=preventing20free20discussion20leads20to20extremismandf=false , pgs. 3- 4, EmmieeM) 103 -First, we should carefully calibrate prevention activities and avoid catch-all, indiscriminate 104 -AND 105 -law enforcement or secret services because this would discredit and ultimately sabotage them. 106 - 107 - 108 -====This is especially pertinent in the case of colleges – students are much more likely to be recruited or adopt extremist views==== 109 -**Borum 5** (Randy Borum – Professor and Director of Intelligence Studies in the School of Information and Academic Coordination for Cybersecurity at the University of Southern Florida; Chuck Tilby – member of the Police Department, "Anarchist Direct Action: A Challenge for Law Enforcement", "Recruitment, pg. 214, http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1552andcontext=mhlp_facpub, EmmieeM) 110 -It should not be surprising to learn that jails and prisons are major recruiting sites 111 -AND 112 -to be young, energetic, and idealistic with time available to act. 113 - 114 - 115 -====Lone wolf attackers are a unique threat – harder to track due to no required communication and much more deadly due to lack of constraints==== 116 -**Simon 13** (Jeffrey Simon – runs a terror and security consulting company; former RAND analyst; UCLA lecturer; published in The Journal of the American Medical Association, Foreign Policy, The Journal of Terrorism and Political Violence, The Columbia Journal of World Business, and The New York Times, "Lone Wolf Terrorism: Understanding the Growing Threat", https://books.google.com/books?hl=enandlr=andid=MQxRCwAAQBAJandoi=fndandpg=PA3andots=w6d3tqK3hqandsig=zd9pzTPhaC2w5xBQPm1Uc3FSDHc~~#v=onepageandqandf=false, 117 -pgs. 4, EmmieeM) 118 -With the lone wolf terrorist threat growing and 119 -AND 120 -dangerous because sometimes they can be mentally unstable, yet still very effective. 121 - 122 - 123 -====Currently, the biggest terrorist threat to the US is white supremacist lone wolves —- they kill more Americans than jihadists and show more desire to use WMDs==== 124 -**Blair 14 **(Charles P. Blair, Senior Fellow on State and Non-State Threats for the Federation of American Scientists who teaches classes on terrorism and WMD technology at John Hopkins University and George Mason University, "Looking clearly at right-wing terrorism," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 9 June 2014, http://thebulletin.org/looking-clearly-right-wing-terrorism7232, *fc) 125 -Five years ago the US Department of Homeland Security's Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division released 126 -AND 127 -exaggerated, but neither should it be suppressed for political or ideological reasons. 128 - 129 - 130 -====Dispersion of technology enables lone wolf terrorists to access chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons (CBURNs) – the impact will be mass casualties and unprecedented disruption of financial and social systems==== 131 -**Ackerman and Pinson 14** ~~Gary A. ,Director of the Special Projects Division at the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START), University of Maryland, Lauren E., Senior Research/Project Manager at START and PhD student at Yale University, "An Army of One: Assessing CBRN Pursuit and Use by Lone Wolves and Autonomous Cells," Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol. 26, Issue 1, 2014~~ 132 -The first question to answer is whence the concerns about the nexus between CBRN weapons 133 -AND 134 -well influence the weapon selection of lone actor jihadists in Western nations. 19 135 - 136 - 137 -==Solvency== 138 - 139 - 140 -====Censoring hate speech entrenches racism —- extremists get to look like martyrs, offensive terms are re-coded and then normalized, and it abstracts from material change. Also, attempts to censor something empirically make it more appealing and leads to greater publication==== 141 -**Heinze 16** (Eric Heinze – Professor of Law and Humanities at the University of London, "Hate Speech and Democratic Citizenship", "The Prohibitionist Challenge", pgs. 149-152, https://books.google.com/books?id=UJJyCwAAQBAJandpg=PA150andlpg=PA150anddq=censoring+hate+speech+helps+the+right-wing+martyrandsource=blandots=aVdz0PZticandsig=prvOZgxAtkhebwxC7EDhcb6HDicandhl=enandsa=Xandved=0ahUKEwj0xaWXofLQAhXEwlQKHcqWDwUQ6AEIIjAB~~#v=onepageandq=censoring20hate20speech20helps20the20right-wing20martyrandf=false, EmmieeM) 142 -American oppositionists have lacked domestic empirical evidence of ineffectiveness, available on the continent, 143 -AND 144 -still-unconquered, non-viewpoint-punitive territory within public discourse. 145 - 146 - 147 -====The constitutive obligation of the state is to protect citizen interest—individual obligations are not applicable in the public sphere. Goodin 95 ==== 148 -Robert E. Goodin. Philosopher of Political Theory, Public Policy, and Applied Ethics. Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 1995. p. 26-7 149 -The great adventure of utilitarianism as a guide to public conduct is that it avoids 150 -AND 151 -thus understood is, I would argue, a uniquely defensible public philosophy. 152 - 153 - 154 -====Death is the worst form of evil since it destroys the subject itself.==== 155 -**Paterson 03** – Department of Philosophy, Providence College, Rhode Island (Craig, "A Life Not Worth Living?", Studies in Christian Ethics. 156 -Contrary to those accounts, I would argue that it is death per se that 157 -AND 158 -the person, the very source and condition of all human possibility.82 159 - 160 - 161 -====Independently, the ability to handle differing opinion is the most important internal link to competitiveness —- prevents workplace apathy and encourages diverse perspectives on issues==== 162 -**Viljoen 15** (Rica Viljoen - Adjunct Faculty at Henley Business School – Africa, "Inclusive Organizational Transformation: An African Perspective on Human Niches and Diversity of Thought", "2.8 Conclusion", https://books.google.com/books?id=WDE3DAAAQBAJandpg=PA46andlpg=PA46anddq=the+ability+to+handle+opposing+views+is+critical+forandsource=blandots=Zf3rT7MKovandsig=gtUj7Y8AxKh-TPNlCrT6ebbJ9Gsandhl=enandsa=Xandved=0ahUKEwjqqsus-tjQAhVB5mMKHb4ICiAQ6AEIHDAA~~#v=onepageandq=the20ability20to20handle20opposing20views20is20critical20forandf=false , pgs. 45-46, EmmieeM) 163 -The integral inclusivity framework presented in Figure 2.2 depicts how, through the 164 -AND 165 -diversity dynamics that typically may negatively impact on organizational behaviour, are optimized. 80 +. Instead we prefer to shout and denounce. Good luck with that. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-0 1-1404:09:47.01 +2017-02-11 05:26:20.0 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - 11 +9 - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -J ANFEBAC-UtilWholeRes1 +Jan-Feb - WoT AC Updated - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stanford
- Caselist.RoundClass[2]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-0 1-1404:09:45.01 +2017-02-11 05:26:18.0 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - 11 +9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stanford
- Caselist.RoundClass[3]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-0 1-1404:13:31.01 +2017-02-19 02:02:28.0
- Caselist.RoundClass[4]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-0 1-1416:18:39.01 +2017-02-19 02:12:45.0 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - 11 +9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Berkeley
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-0 1-1416:18:48.01 +2017-05-13 21:35:33.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Russell Weas - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Elite Leader Institute ZW - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - 11 +4 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +MS TOC
- Caselist.RoundClass[6]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-0 1-1416:20:13.01 +2017-06-21 14:38:44.927 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Nathan Leal - OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Harker/Vinod+Aff/Harker-Vinod-Aff-NDSA%20Nats%20MS-Round1.docx - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +St Johns CZ - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - 21 +1 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,2 @@ 1 +1AC - Immigration Terror 2 +1NC - Cyberterror DA Epidemics DA (does not defend any world) - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NDSA Nats MS
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-14 16:25:30.0 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2
- Caselist.RoundClass[8]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-14 20:56:45.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Scott Wheeler - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Servine SP - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harvard-Westlake
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-14 21:43:35.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Scott Wheeler - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Servine SP - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harvard-Westlake
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Email 21AditiV@students.harker.org for questions/concerns or even the full text - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-19 02:02:30.0 - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harker Vinod Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 - Contact Info
- Caselist.CitesClass[3]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,129 @@ 1 +=1AC= 2 + 3 + 4 +===Framework=== 5 + 6 + 7 +====We need to engage with concrete action, we have become fixated on symbolic gestures and looking to personal ethics, leading to serial policy failure and the War on Terror. Thus the role of the ballot is to vote for the debater that best deconstructs the security state through policy action. ==== 8 +**Chandler 7** (David Chandler – Professor of International Relations and the Director of the Centre for the Study of Democracy at the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of Westminster. He's also the founding editor of the Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, "The Attraction of Post-Territorial Politics: Ethics and Activism in the International Sphere (The Inaugural Lecture of Professor David Chandler)", http://www.davidchandler.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Inaugural-lecture.pdf, pgs. 1-9, EmmieeM) 9 +Introduction. It seems that our engagement with and understanding of politics is increasingly shaped 10 +AND 11 +, critique, and ultimately overcome the practices and subjectivities of our time. 12 + 13 + 14 +====Thus, the plan. Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. ==== 15 +**Downs 4** (Donald Alexander Downs – Professor of Political Science, Law and Journalism at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, and Research Fellow at the Independent Institute, Oakland, California. He has won the Annisfield-Wolf Book Award, the Gladys M. Kammerer Award of the American Political Science Association, and has been in published in journals, encyclopedias, and professional books. "Restoring Free Speech and Liberty on Campus", pgs. Xx – xxi, http://www.thedivineconspiracy.org/Z5243N.pdf, EmmieeM) 16 +During most of the twentieth century, threats to campus free speech and academic freedom 17 +AND 18 +commitment on campus can help to bring about this retrieval of liberal principles. 19 + 20 + 21 +==Recognition== 22 + 23 + 24 +====Colleges are the target of the security state – perception that universities are capable of supporting democracy and dissent over the War on Terror and free enterprise drives right-wing extremists to enforce censorship pretending to advance and tolerate rights.==== 25 +**Giroux 6** (Henry A. Giroux – one of the founding theorists of critical pedagogy, PhD from Carnegie, was a professor at Boston University and scholar at Miami University. Was the founding Director of the Center for Education and Cultural Studies. Published by John Hopkins University Press, "Academic Freedom Under FIre: The Case for Critical Pedagogy, pgs. 1 – 9, http://muse.jhu.edu/article/203608/pdf, EmmieeM) 26 +Higher education in the United States appears to be caught in a strange contradiction. 27 +AND 28 +the best talent to American universities" (Jonathan Cole 2005b, B7). 29 + 30 + 31 +====The security state pretends to enforce diversity in colleges while using censorship to eradicate dissenters and minorities. Absent analysis of the War on Terror, liberation becomes impossible because struggles for racial or gender equality leads to Islamaphobia and Middle East interventionism.==== 32 +**Chatterjee 14** (Piya Chatterjee – Gender and Woman's Studies Chair of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Department at Scripps; B.A. from Wellesley in Political Science/Anthropology; M.A. at UChicago in Political Science/Anthropology; PhD at UChicago in Anthropology; numerous awards (professor of the year, bridging theory to practice grant, ford foundation grant, etc); Sunandra Maira – Professor of Asian American studies at UC Davis; Ed.D in Human Development and Psychology from Harvard; "The Imperial University: Race, War, and the Nation-State", "Academic Contaiment" – entire section, pg. 17 – 25, https://www.csun.edu/cdsc/Imperial20University20Introduction20-20Piya20Chatterjee20and20Sunaina20Maira.pdf, "Academic Containment", EmmieeM) 33 +State warfare and militarism have shored up deeply powerful notions of patriotism, intertwined with 34 +AND 35 +the mission of higher education and the future of the nation-state. 36 + 37 + 38 +====The security state operates on a binary where people are either allies or dissenters to be destroyed at all costs, anything other than complete rejection hyperlinks to the impacts of the AFF. ==== 39 +**Ivie 5** (Robert L. Ivie – PhD in Rhetoric and Communication at WashU, "Democratic Dissent and the Trick of Rhetorical Critique", "Dissent as a Form of Struggle" – entire section, pg. 279 – 280, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.832.4092andrep=rep1andtype=pdf, EmmieeM) 40 +Democracy's formidable challenge may be most clearly indicated on the occasion of war. War 41 +AND 42 +it is otherwise curtailed and constrained by a regime of crisis and war? 43 + 44 + 45 +====The state justifies warfare with this binary to sustain hegemony and the myth of threats, any weighing calculus that fails to account for the invisible violence happening in the status quo is epistemologically flawed – only through acknowledging that the War on Terror is fueled by the torture and slaughter of ordinary citizens can we deconstruct securitization. ==== 46 +**McClintock 9** (Anne McClintock – B.A in English from University of Cape Town; M.Phil in Linguistics at the University of Cambridge; PhD in English Literature from Columbia; previous Associate Professor of Gender and Cultural Studies at Columbia"Paranoid Empire: Specters From Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib", pgs. 50-54, http://english110fall2014leroy.qwriting.qc.cuny.edu/files/2014/06/13.1.mcclintock.pdf, EmmieeM) 47 +The question is still open: what is the purpose of Guantanamo Bay? Is 48 +AND 49 +contradictory sites where imperial racism, sexuality, and gender catastrophically collide.11 50 + 51 + 52 +====Free speech replace campus criticism with government-approved propaganda – massive spillover – journalism grads lose the ability to pursue controversial pieces and censorship becomes normalized==== 53 +**Sanders 6** (Chris Sanders – University of Arizona Law Review, "Censorship 101: Anti-Hazelwood Laws and the Preservation of Free Speech at Colleges and Universities", "Say no More: Hazelwood's Dangers For College Students' Free Expression" – through the end of "Too Much Freedom: How the Extension of Hazelwood to Universities Could Endanger the Future of the First Amendment", pgs. 171 – 173, https://www.law.ua.edu/pubs/lrarticles/Volume2058/Issue201/sanders.pdf , EmmieeM) 54 +Post-Hazelwood censorship disputes have not been limited to high schools; a number 55 +AND 56 +" speech is nothing more than a distant memory from an earlier time. 57 + 58 + 59 +====Discourse is a pre-requisite to change – relationships must first be made visible before reformation can occur==== 60 +**Wingenbach 11** (Ed, Notre Dame Government and international studies PhD, "Institutionalizing Agonistic Democracy," pg 190-198, https://books.google.com/books?id=7-8JrC64UgwCandprintsec=frontcover//LADI) 61 +Third, because Knops ignores the situated source of antagonism and the persistence of hegemony 62 +AND 63 +opened up to greater contestation, generosity, and active re-constitution. 64 + 65 + 66 +==Underview== 67 + 68 + 69 +====Looking to critiques guarantees failure as you deny 6 billion people a network of production that is crucial to their survival and is more likely to drive people towards reigning ideology.==== 70 +**Bryant 12** — Levi R. Bryant, Professor of Philosophy at Collin College, holds a Ph.D. in Philosophy from Loyola University in Chicago, 2012 ("Underpants Gnomes: A Critique of the Academic Left," Larval Subjects—Levi R. Bryant's philosophy blog, November 11^^th^^, Available Online at http://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2012/11/11/underpants-gnomes-a-critique-of-the-academic-left/, Accessed 02-21-2014) 71 +I must be in a mood today–half irritated, half amused–because 72 +AND 73 +. Instead we prefer to shout and denounce. Good luck with that. 74 + 75 + 76 +====It's try or die – militarism is the root cause of everything CACC 11:==== 77 +Admin, "Rejecting Militarism", FEBRUARY 15, 2011, Canadians for Emergency action on Climate Change, http://climatesoscanada.org/blog/2011/02/15/rejecting-militarism/ climate change, wars, displacement, resource scarcity, false solutions, wealth concentration 78 +Resources: ~~1~~ http://www.fcnl.org/budget/ 79 +AND 80 +will not accept the death spiral of militarism, war and climate change. 81 + 82 + 83 +====Totalizing accounts of power freeze resistance – working within structures of power creates spaces of meaning contra oppressive scripts.==== 84 +**Zanotti** **13** (Laura, Ph.D., Virginia Tech, "Governmentality, Ontology, Methodology: Re-thinking Political Agency in the Global World," Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 201X, Vol XX(X) 1–17) 85 +Political agency is not portrayed as the free subjects' total rejection of a unified totalizing 86 +AND 87 +position leads not to apathy but to hyper- and pessimistic activism.'' 88 + 89 + 90 +====1. The impact of T and Theory must be to drop the argument:==== 91 + 92 + 93 +====A. Proportionality: Rejecting the debater for a single issue is unfair. If I make an unfair argument then I should lose that argument not the entire round.==== 94 + 95 + 96 +====B. Brightline: Abuse falls on a continuum from small violations to larger ones, and when the abuse becomes significant enough to reject the debater is arbitrary. Because the decision is inevitably arbitrary, using the debate equivalent of a death penalty supercharges the arbitrariness==== 97 + 98 + 99 +====2. If theory is a reason to reject the debater, theory must be an RVI for the aff—that is, either an I meet or a counterinterp is sufficient to win the round.==== 100 + 101 + 102 +====A. Time Skew: By precluding the AC, theory makes the 6 minute AC useless and only leaves me 7 minutes of speaking time.==== 103 + 104 + 105 +====B. Reciprocity: My opponent has quantitatively more ways to reach the ballot. He can win through either winning substance or theory while I have to do both in order to win. They can choose what they want to collapse to but I can't. ==== 106 + 107 + 108 +====3. Theory should be an issue of reasonability—the brightline is the existence of link and impact turn ground—all I have to do to answer his theory is prove as long as he can engage in the same practice, that means there's no abuse because structural access to the ballot is the same or as long as he can turn the AC, it's fair. ==== 109 + 110 + 111 +====A. There are multiple legitimate interpretations of the topic and the aff goes into the round blind==== 112 + 113 + 114 +====B. Increases topical clash by avoiding unnecessary theory; I am open to accepting neg interps provided they are reasonable and solves abuse on spec because I'll clarify in CX. ==== 115 + 116 + 117 +====4. Both the affirmative and negative must check all theory interps read within the round within cross examination—that is, they must ask whether I meet x interpretation.==== 118 + 119 + 120 +====A. Prevent frivolous I meet theory, because we can resolve the nitty gritty semantics of theory within CX.==== 121 + 122 + 123 +====B. CX checks deters abusive 1ACs because the aff is no longer able to make ridiculous I meets.==== 124 + 125 + 126 +====C. CX enough to check all theory interps in the 1ac—you have 7 minutes of prep time.==== 127 + 128 + 129 +====D. CX checks bad is a counterinterpretation, this is an offensive interpretation that sets a burden on both debaters to meet==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-19 02:12:47.0 - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harker Vinod Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Jan-Feb - WoT AC Most Recent - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Berkeley
- Caselist.CitesClass[4]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,141 @@ 1 +=1AC = 2 + 3 + 4 +====I affirm. Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the US ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. ==== 5 + 6 + 7 +====To clarify, here's a comprehensive list of things the First Amendment does not permit –obscenity, expression that causes injury, and remarks that cause violence==== 8 +Ruane 14 (Kathleen Anne Ruane – Legislative Attorney. Her report was published by the Congressional Research Service, which is a branch of government, "Freedom of Speech and Press: Exceptions to the First Amendment", https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/95-815.pdf,pgs. 1-5, EmmieeM) 9 +The First Amendment to the united States Constitution provides that "Congress shall make no 10 +AND 11 +constitutes a "true threat," and not against mere "political hyperbole." 12 + 13 + 14 +== Framework == 15 + 16 + 17 +====The standard is maximizing expected wellbeing as contextualized by impacts on case==== 18 + 19 + 20 +====Util is axiomatically true - all value stems from experienced wellbeing. Harris 10==== 21 +Sam Harris 2010. CEO Project Reason; PHD UCLA Neuroscience; BA Stanford Philosophy. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values." 22 +I believe that we will increasingly understand good and evil, right and wrong, 23 +AND 24 +, therefore, consequences and conscious states remain the foundation of all values. 25 + 26 + 27 +==Solvency== 28 + 29 + 30 +====Censoring hate speech entrenches racism —- extremists get to look like martyrs, offensive terms are re-coded and then normalized, and it abstracts from material change. Also, attempts to censor something empirically make it more appealing and leads to greater publication==== 31 +**Heinze 16** (Eric Heinze – Professor of Law and Humanities at the University of London, "Hate Speech and Democratic Citizenship", "The Prohibitionist Challenge", pgs. 149-152, https://books.google.com/books?id=UJJyCwAAQBAJandpg=PA150andlpg=PA150anddq=censoring+hate+speech+helps+the+right-wing+martyrandsource=blandots=aVdz0PZticandsig=prvOZgxAtkhebwxC7EDhcb6HDicandhl=enandsa=Xandved=0ahUKEwj0xaWXofLQAhXEwlQKHcqWDwUQ6AEIIjAB~~#v=onepageandq=censoring20hate20speech20helps20the20right-wing20martyrandf=false, EmmieeM) 32 +American oppositionists have lacked domestic empirical evidence of ineffectiveness, available on the continent, 33 +AND 34 +still-unconquered, non-viewpoint-punitive territory within public discourse. 35 + 36 + 37 +====Independently, the ability to handle differing opinion is the most important internal link to competitiveness —- prevents workplace apathy and encourages diverse perspectives on issues==== 38 +**Viljoen 15** (Rica Viljoen - Adjunct Faculty at Henley Business School – Africa, "Inclusive Organizational Transformation: An African Perspective on Human Niches and Diversity of Thought", "2.8 Conclusion", https://books.google.com/books?id=WDE3DAAAQBAJandpg=PA46andlpg=PA46anddq=the+ability+to+handle+opposing+views+is+critical+forandsource=blandots=Zf3rT7MKovandsig=gtUj7Y8AxKh-TPNlCrT6ebbJ9Gsandhl=enandsa=Xandved=0ahUKEwjqqsus-tjQAhVB5mMKHb4ICiAQ6AEIHDAA~~#v=onepageandq=the20ability20to20handle20opposing20views20is20critical20forandf=false , pgs. 45-46, EmmieeM) 39 +The integral inclusivity framework presented in Figure 2.2 depicts how, through the 40 +AND 41 +diversity dynamics that typically may negatively impact on organizational behaviour, are optimized. 42 + 43 + 44 +==Innovation== 45 + 46 + 47 +====Restrictions on free speech are rapidly increasing, destroying the educational environment==== 48 +**Slater 16** (Tom Slator – editor of this book (it's a collection of essays from many different people). He also wrote the introduction from which this was cut. Deputy Editor of Spiked, runs Free Speech University Ratings, and has written for The Times/The Telegraph/Independent, "Unsafe Space: The Crisis of Free Speech on Campus", pgs. 2 - 3, https://books.google.com/books?hl=enandlr=andid=vdP7CwAAQBAJandoi=fndandpg=PP1anddq=college+speech+restrictions+risingandots=YBNOvRNy1Tandsig=BmpSFkTJts9QsI1YcDAjxmB6dpQ~~#v=onepageandq=college20speech20restrictions20risingandf=false, EmmieeM) 49 +Over the past few years, campus censorship has reached epidemic levels. In 2015 50 +AND 51 +dwell on the easy arguments and defend only the most socially acceptable targets. 52 + 53 + 54 +====This hamstrings innovation —- universities require free exchange of knowledge as a pre-requisite to education and regulations risk transforming academies into authoritarian structures==== 55 +**ACTA 13 **(American Council of Trustees and Alumni – independent non-profit that is focused on maintaining academic freedom and accountability among US colleges. "Free to Teach, Free to Learn: Understanding and Maintaining Academic Freedom in Higher Education", pgs. 23-25, http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED560924.pdf, EmmieeM) 56 +The primary function of a university is to discover and disseminate knowledge by means of 57 +AND 58 +be left to the informal processes of suasion, example, and argument. 59 + 60 + 61 +====Free speech on public colleges is a key internal link to scientific discovery —- campus speech restrictions allows for worse forms of coercion that skews data and a culture of open debate is key to advancement==== 62 +**Economist 16 **("Under Attack", "The Inconvenient Truth", http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21699909-curbs-free-speech-are-growing-tighter-it-time-speak-out-under-attack, EmmieeM) 63 +Intolerance among Western liberals also has wholly unintended consequences. Even despots know that locking 64 +AND 65 +Win the argument without resorting to force. And grow a tougher hide. 66 + 67 + 68 +====Constant innovation in the chemical industry is key to check emerging diseases==== 69 +**NRC 2002**, ~~National Research Council Committee on Challenges for Chemical Sciences in the 21st century "National Security and Homeland Defense" http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK114822/)//a-berg 70 +Many drugs are produced by either chemical synthesis or biosynthetic processes. Recent advances in 71 +AND 72 +them for their biological activities or functions also remains a challenge to industry. 73 + 74 + 75 +====Absent innovation, new pathogens guarantee extinction —- decreasing biodiversity means spread between hosts is easier which checks empirics and generic defense==== 76 +**Yule '13** 77 +(et al; Jeffrey V. Yule – Herbert McElveen Professor of Applied and Natural Sciences At the School of Biological Sciences, Louisiana Tech University, Published April 2^^nd^^ – Humanities 2013, 2, 147–159; doi:10.3390/h2020147) 78 +Since the 1940s, humans in industrialized nations have been relatively sheltered from the threat 79 +AND 80 +not, and the potential failure of our species has considerable biological implications. 81 + 82 + 83 +====Competitiveness is key to US dominance – we need to keep innovating faster to ensure economic prosperity and hegemony==== 84 +Segal 04 – Senior Fellow in China Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations 85 +~~Adam, Foreign Affairs, "Is America Losing Its Edge?" November / December 2004, http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20041101facomment83601/adam-segal/is-america-losing-its-edge.html~~ 86 +The United States' global primacy depends in large part on its ability to develop new 87 +AND 88 +, the United States must get better at fostering technological entrepreneurship at home. 89 + 90 + 91 +====Loss of competitiveness results in great power conflict—retrenchment makes war inevitable and ensures the US would be dragged in – that causes your heg bad impacts so it's try or die for the AFF==== 92 +**Khalilzad 11** — Zalmay Khalilzad, Counselor at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, served as the United States ambassador to Afghanistan, Iraq, and the United Nations during the presidency of George W. Bush, served as the director of policy planning at the Defense Department during the Presidency of George H.W. Bush, holds a Ph.D. from the University of Chicago, 2011 ("The Economy and National Security," National Review, February 8^^th^^, Available Online at http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/print/259024, Accessed 02-08-2011) 93 +Today, economic and fiscal trends pose the most severe long-term threat to 94 +AND 95 +leading the world toward a new, dangerous era of multi-polarity. 96 + 97 + 98 +==Terror == 99 + 100 + 101 +====Colleges can serve as unique places that prevent people from becoming trapped in echo chambers, but college censorship is ruining that —- students are becoming more extremist, less understanding, and convinced that they are at war with an evil "Other"==== 102 +**Lukianoff no date **(Greg Lukianoff – attorney and CEO at the Foundation of Individual Rights in Education (FIRE); published in Wall Street Journal, LA Times, NY Times, Washington Post, and many others; has appeared on CBS Evening News, NBC's Today Show, and many others,"How Colleges Create the 'Expectation of Confirmation'", "Polarization and the Thickening Walls of Our Echo Chamber" – "Can College Help Break Down the Expectation of Confirmation?", http://www.soamcontest.com/content/how-colleges-create-expectation-confirmation, EmmieeM) 103 +In his 2008 book, The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like- 104 +AND 105 +to the bold questioning and uncomfortable discussions that intellectual and societal innovation demands. 106 + 107 + 108 +====Freedom of expression allows extremist viewpoints to be challenged through debate, which demonstrates their flaws and de-motivates others from adopting them — speech bans only lead to hostility, divided communities, and push-back, which exacerbates terrorism==== 109 +**Lombardi 15 **(Marco Lombardi – member of the Italian Team for Security, Terroristic Issues, and Managing Emergencies, which is a research department in the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Milan, "Countering Radicalisation and Violent Extremism Among Youth to Prevent Terrorism", https://books.google.com/books?id=_kAoBgAAQBAJandpg=PA3andlpg=PA3anddq=preventing+free+discussion+leads+to+extremismandsource=blandots=TJ8fW6700zandsig=Lz4MWuGl6LkEYxy5RdXBDrCAxfUandhl=enandsa=Xandved=0ahUKEwiq56aDsvTQAhUS1GMKHRNUBC4Q6AEIXzAN~~#v=onepageandq=preventing20free20discussion20leads20to20extremismandf=false , pgs. 3- 4, EmmieeM) 110 +First, we should carefully calibrate prevention activities and avoid catch-all, indiscriminate 111 +AND 112 +law enforcement or secret services because this would discredit and ultimately sabotage them. 113 + 114 + 115 +====This is especially pertinent in the case of colleges – students are much more likely to be recruited or adopt extremist views==== 116 +**Borum 5** (Randy Borum – Professor and Director of Intelligence Studies in the School of Information and Academic Coordination for Cybersecurity at the University of Southern Florida; Chuck Tilby – member of the Police Department, "Anarchist Direct Action: A Challenge for Law Enforcement", "Recruitment, pg. 214, http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1552andcontext=mhlp_facpub, EmmieeM) 117 +It should not be surprising to learn that jails and prisons are major recruiting sites 118 +AND 119 +to be young, energetic, and idealistic with time available to act. 120 + 121 + 122 +====Lone wolf attackers are a unique threat – harder to track due to no required communication and much more deadly due to lack of constraints==== 123 +**Simon 13** (Jeffrey Simon – runs a terror and security consulting company; former RAND analyst; UCLA lecturer; published in The Journal of the American Medical Association, Foreign Policy, The Journal of Terrorism and Political Violence, The Columbia Journal of World Business, and The New York Times, "Lone Wolf Terrorism: Understanding the Growing Threat", https://books.google.com/books?hl=enandlr=andid=MQxRCwAAQBAJandoi=fndandpg=PA3andots=w6d3tqK3hqandsig=zd9pzTPhaC2w5xBQPm1Uc3FSDHc~~#v=onepageandqandf=false, 124 +pgs. 4, EmmieeM) 125 +With the lone wolf terrorist threat growing and 126 +AND 127 +dangerous because sometimes they can be mentally unstable, yet still very effective. 128 + 129 + 130 +====Currently, the biggest terrorist threat to the US is white supremacist lone wolves —- they kill more Americans than jihadists and show more desire to use WMDs==== 131 +**Blair 14 **(Charles P. Blair, Senior Fellow on State and Non-State Threats for the Federation of American Scientists who teaches classes on terrorism and WMD technology at John Hopkins University and George Mason University, "Looking clearly at right-wing terrorism," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 9 June 2014, http://thebulletin.org/looking-clearly-right-wing-terrorism7232, *fc) 132 +Five years ago the US Department of Homeland Security's Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division released 133 +AND 134 +exaggerated, but neither should it be suppressed for political or ideological reasons. 135 + 136 + 137 +====Dispersion of technology enables lone wolf terrorists to access chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons (CBURNs) – the impact will be mass casualties and unprecedented disruption of financial and social systems==== 138 +**Ackerman and Pinson 14** ~~Gary A. ,Director of the Special Projects Division at the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START), University of Maryland, Lauren E., Senior Research/Project Manager at START and PhD student at Yale University, "An Army of One: Assessing CBRN Pursuit and Use by Lone Wolves and Autonomous Cells," Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol. 26, Issue 1, 2014~~ 139 +The first question to answer is whence the concerns about the nexus between CBRN weapons 140 +AND 141 +well influence the weapon selection of lone actor jihadists in Western nations. 19 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-05-13 21:35:35.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Russell Weas - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Elite Leader Institute ZW - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harker Vinod Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Jan-Feb Trutil AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +MS TOC
- Caselist.RoundClass[1]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-15 00:26:09.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Scott Wheeler - OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Harker/Vinod+Aff/Harker-Vinod-Aff-Harvard%20Westlake-Round2.docx - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Servine SP - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard Westlake