Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[1]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[1]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[1]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-09-24 03:52:50.557
	1	+2016-09-24 03:52:50.0

Caselist.CitesClass[1]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,136 @@
	1	+===Fwk===
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+
	5	+====The standard is maximizing expected wellbeing.====
	6	+
	7	+
	8	+
	9	+====First, the constitutive obligation of the state is to protect citizen interest—individual obligations are not applicable in the public sphere. Goodin 95 ====
	10	+Robert E. Goodin. Philosopher of Political Theory, Public Policy, and Applied Ethics. Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 1995. p. 26-7
	11	+The great adventure of utilitarianism as a guide to public conduct is that it avoids
	12	+
	13	+AND
	14	+
	15	+thus understood is, I would argue, a uniquely defensible public philosophy.
	16	+
	17	+
	18	+
	19	+====Second, only impacts and values that exist in the physical world are relevant. Physical realism is the only meaningful ontological theory of being. Williams,====
	20	+**Donald Williams. "Naturalism and the Nature of Things." The Philosophical Review, Vol. 53, No. 5 (Sep., 1944), pp. 417-443. Duke UP. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2181355**
	21	+Casting up our accounts to this point, we observe that physical realism is in
	22	+
	23	+AND
	24	+
	25	+in patterns of action in the ordered dimensions of a spatio-temporal hypersphere
	26	+
	27	+
	28	+
	29	+====Third is the act omission distinction, governments are morally responsible for their omissions because they always face choices between different sets of policy options, all of which advantage some while disadvantaging others.====
	30	+Cass R. Sunstein and Vermeule Adrian ~~"Is Capital Punishment Morally Required? Acts, Omissions, and Life-Life Tradeoffs. Copyright (c) 2005 The Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University. Stanford Law Review December,2005 58 Stan. L. Rev. 703~~
	31	+The critics of capital punishment have been led astray by uncritically applying the act/
	32	+
	33	+AND
	34	+
	35	+creating entitlements ~~*722~~ and prohibitions, is not inaction at all.
	36	+
	37	+
	38	+
	39	+===Plan===
	40	+
	41	+
	42	+
	43	+====Plan Text: All countries ought to prohibit the production of nuclear power in outer space. ====
	44	+
	45	+
	46	+
	47	+**====We must ban nuclear power used in outer space====**
	48	+**Grossman, 15**
	49	+Karl Grossman (professor of journalism at the State University of New York College at Old Westbury. For more than 45 years he has pioneered the combination of investigative reporting and environmental journalism in a variety of media), 6-29-2015, "The Perils of Nuclear-Powered Space Flights," counterpunch.org, http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/06/29/the-perils-of-nuclear-powered-space-flights/
	50	+When the Cassini space probe was sent off to Saturn in 1997—with three
	51	+
	52	+AND
	53	+
	54	+something the public nor the planet can afford to take a chance on."
	55	+
	56	+
	57	+
	58	+====Inherency and Uniqueness- nuclear reactors on spacecraft will be used to generate thrust—it’s the current future of space exploration. Zolfagharifard ‘16====
	59	+**Ellie Zolfagharifard For Dailymail, 3-18-2016, "Nasa wants to use nuclear rockets to get to Mars," Mail Online, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3499441/Nasa-wants-use-nuclear-rockets-Mars-Space-agency-claims-technique-effective-way-reaching-red-planet.html**
	60	+Nuclear thermal propulsion is 'the most effective' way of sending humans to Mars. That's
	61	+
	62	+AND
	63	+
	64	+'Advanced nuclear propulsion systems could have extremely high performance and unique capabilities.'
	65	+
	66	+
	67	+
	68	+===Accidents Advantage===
	69	+
	70	+
	71	+
	72	+====The chance of a nuclear accident due to space propulsion is high—affects billions. Bryson ‘96====
	73	+**Chris Bryson, December 1996 "Cassini — NASA'S Millennial Nuclear Nightmare," Christian Science Monitor, http://www.animatedsoftware.com/cassini/crbryson.htm**
	74	+Post-graduate geology student Leo Alvarado also witnessed the accident and telephoned the local
	75	+
	76	+AND
	77	+
	78	+that we are never going to have one of these things come down?"
	79	+
	80	+
	81	+
	82	+====An nuclear space accident causes a massive EMP detonation.====
	83	+**Staughton ’16 (John Staughton, February 2016, What Would Happen If A Nuke Exploded In Space? https://www.scienceabc.com/eyeopeners/happen-nuke-exploded-space.html )**
	84	+Perhaps even more worrying than the huge amount of radiation being dropped into Earth’s atmosphere
	85	+
	86	+AND
	87	+
	88	+the widespread technological devastation from an EMP big enough to shut down Texas!
	89	+
	90	+
	91	+
	92	+====Extinction ====
	93	+Pry 10 (Peter Vincent, director of the U.S. Nuclear Strategy Forum, "What America Needs to Know About EMPs" http://wethearmed.com/index.php?topic=8450.0)
	94	+EMP is not just a threat to computers and electronic gadgets, but to all
	95	+
	96	+AND
	97	+
	98	+to the United States and advocated immediate implementation of the EMP Commission's recommendations.
	99	+
	100	+
	101	+
	102	+===Space Militarization Advantage===
	103	+
	104	+
	105	+
	106	+====Nuclear power in space leads to space weapons—inevitable consequence and hidden motive for nuclear space programs. Grossman ‘03 ====
	107	+**Karl Grossman, professor of journalism at the State University of New York/College at Old Westbury, February 5 2003, "Nukes-in-Space in Columbia's Wake", http://www.space4peace.org/articles/columbiaswake.htm**
	108	+Gagnon, coordinator of the Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space,
	109	+
	110	+AND
	111	+
	112	+of what kind of seed do we carry with us out into space."
	113	+
	114	+
	115	+
	116	+====Space weaponization causes extinction—outweighs nuclear war. Mitchell ‘01 ====
	117	+**Mitchell, 01 – Associate Professor of Communication and Director of Debate at the University of Pittsburgh (Dr. Gordon, ISIS Briefing on Ballistic Missile Defence, "Missile Defence: Trans-Atlantic Diplomacy at a Crossroads", No. 6 July, http://www.isisuk.demon.co.uk/0811/isis/uk/bmd/no6.html)**
	118	+A buildup of space weapons might begin with noble intentions of 'peace through strength' deterrence
	119	+
	120	+AND
	121	+
	122	+space could plunge the world into the most destructive military conflict ever seen.
	123	+
	124	+
	125	+
	126	+===Space Col Bad – Ozone Loss===
	127	+
	128	+
	129	+
	130	+====Increased space launches risks massive ozone destruction. UCS ‘02====
	131	+**Union of Concerned Scientists 02, (The Science of Ozone Depletion "© Union of Concerned Scientists Page Last Revised: 10.24.2002", http://www.ucsusa.org/global'environment/archive/page.cfm?pageID=551)**
	132	+The solid rocket strap-on motors used in the most powerful space launch systems
	133	+
	134	+AND
	135	+
	136	+the ozone layer, these problems could cause widespread destruction of life.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-09-24 03:52:52.466

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+xx

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+xx

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harker Shen Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Kelly Shen Space Aff

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Valley