| ... |
... |
@@ -1,21
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-==Util Fwk== |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
-====The standard is consequentialism==== |
| 4 |
|
- |
| 5 |
|
-====Phenomenal introspection is reliable and proves that util's true.==== |
| 6 |
|
-**Sinhababu** Neil (National University of Singapore) "The epistemic argument for hedonism" http://philpapers.org/archive/SINTEA-3 accessed 2-4-16 JW |
| 7 |
|
-The Odyssey's treatment of these events demonstrates how dramatically ancient Greek moral intuitions differ from |
| 8 |
|
-AND |
| 9 |
|
-favors the kind of universal hedonism that supports utilitarianism, not egoistic hedonism. |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-====Second, only impacts and values that exist in the physical world are relevant. Physical realism is the only meaningful ontological theory of being. Williams,==== |
| 12 |
|
-**Donald Williams. "Naturalism and the Nature of Things." The Philosophical Review, Vol. 53, No. 5 (Sep., 1944), pp. 417-443. Duke UP. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2181355** |
| 13 |
|
-Casting up our accounts to this point, we observe that physical realism is in |
| 14 |
|
-AND |
| 15 |
|
-in patterns of action in the ordered dimensions of a spatio-temporal hypersphere |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
-====Third is the act omission distinction, governments are morally responsible for their omissions because they always face choices between different sets of policy options, all of which advantage some while disadvantaging others.==== |
| 18 |
|
-Cass R. Sunstein and Vermeule Adrian ~~"Is Capital Punishment Morally Required? Acts, Omissions, and Life-Life Tradeoffs. Copyright (c) 2005 The Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University. Stanford Law Review December,2005 58 Stan. L. Rev. 703~~ |
| 19 |
|
-The critics of capital punishment have been led astray by uncritically applying the act/ |
| 20 |
|
-AND |
| 21 |
|
-creating entitlements ~~*722~~ and prohibitions, is not inaction at all. |