Changes for page Harker Manglik Neg
Summary
-
Objects (2 modified, 7 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[10]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-01-14 23:46:10. 8011 +2017-01-14 23:46:10.0
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +10
- Caselist.CitesClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,21 @@ 1 +==Util Fwk== 2 + 3 +====The standard is consequentialism==== 4 + 5 +====Phenomenal introspection is reliable and proves that util's true.==== 6 +**Sinhababu** Neil (National University of Singapore) "The epistemic argument for hedonism" http://philpapers.org/archive/SINTEA-3 accessed 2-4-16 JW 7 +The Odyssey's treatment of these events demonstrates how dramatically ancient Greek moral intuitions differ from 8 +AND 9 +favors the kind of universal hedonism that supports utilitarianism, not egoistic hedonism. 10 + 11 +====Second, only impacts and values that exist in the physical world are relevant. Physical realism is the only meaningful ontological theory of being. Williams,==== 12 +**Donald Williams. "Naturalism and the Nature of Things." The Philosophical Review, Vol. 53, No. 5 (Sep., 1944), pp. 417-443. Duke UP. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2181355** 13 +Casting up our accounts to this point, we observe that physical realism is in 14 +AND 15 +in patterns of action in the ordered dimensions of a spatio-temporal hypersphere 16 + 17 +====Third is the act omission distinction, governments are morally responsible for their omissions because they always face choices between different sets of policy options, all of which advantage some while disadvantaging others.==== 18 +Cass R. Sunstein and Vermeule Adrian ~~"Is Capital Punishment Morally Required? Acts, Omissions, and Life-Life Tradeoffs. Copyright (c) 2005 The Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University. Stanford Law Review December,2005 58 Stan. L. Rev. 703~~ 19 +The critics of capital punishment have been led astray by uncritically applying the act/ 20 +AND 21 +creating entitlements ~~*722~~ and prohibitions, is not inaction at all. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-10 04:25:40.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Matt Delateur - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Wyatt Alpert - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harker Manglik Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JANFEB - Util NC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Golden Desert
- Caselist.CitesClass[12]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,45 @@ 1 +==T – "Any" (3:30)== 2 + 3 +====Interpretation: The affirmative must defend that public colleges and universities in the Unites States ought to restrict NO constitutionally protected speech. To clarify they may not specify any one type of constitutionally protected speech that ought not be restricted.==== 4 + 5 +====Counterplans by the negative that PIC out of specific kinds of constitutionally protected speech are illegitimate.==== 6 + 7 +====Violation:==== 8 + 9 +====Vote Neg==== 10 + 11 +====Textuality – repeated court rulings define "any" as "all" and explicitly rejected using "any" to refer to "some".==== 12 +**Elder '91(David S. Elder, October 1991, "Any and All": To Use Or Not To Use?" "Plain Language' is a regular feature of the Michigan Bar Journal, edited by Joseph Kimble for the State Bar Plain English Committee. Assistant editor is George H. Hathaway. Through this column the Committee hopes to promote the use of plain English in the law. Want to contribute a plain English article? Contact Prof. Kimble at Thomas Cooley Law School, P.O. Box 13038, Lansing, MI 48901, http://www.michbar.org/file/generalinfo/plainenglish/pdfs/91_oct.pdf ~| SP)** 13 +The Michigan Supreme Court seemed to approve our dictionary definitions of "any" in 14 +AND 15 +(1991) (quoting Harrington v InterState Men's Accident Ass'n, supra) 16 + 17 +====Outweighs:==== 18 + 19 +====Semantic Context 20 + 21 +====Legal Context.==== 22 + 23 +====Semantics come prior to pragmatic considerations:==== 24 + 25 +====Decision Rule – The topicality rule is superior and non uniques your offense.==== 26 +Nebel 15 Jake Nebel (debate coach his students have won the TOC, NDCA, Glenbrooks, Bronx, Emory, TFA State, and the Harvard Round Robin. As a debater, he won six octos-bid championships and was top speaker at the TOC and ten other major tournaments) "The Priority of Resolutional Semantics by Jake Nebel" VBriefly February 20^^th^^ 2015 http://vbriefly.com/2015/02/20/the-priority-of-resolutional-semantics-by-jake-nebel/ JW 2/20/15 27 +One reason why LDers may be suspicious of my view is because they see topicality 28 +AND 29 +the first premise, not the second premise, in the argument above. 30 + 31 +====Jurisdiction.==== 32 + 33 +====Limits – Free Speech is incredibly broad. Star this card, it literally says the only coherent way to conceive of the free speech debate is to consider its few exceptions, which is a comparison of the whole res with its converse.==== 34 +**Silvergate '05 (Harvey A. Silvergate, attorney in Cambridge, Massachusetts. He is the co-founder, with Alan Charles Kors, of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, for which he also serves as the current Chairman of the Board of Directors. January 2005, "FIRE's Guide to Free Speech on Campus," https://www.thefire.org/pdfs/free-speech-2.pdf ~| SP)** 35 +The First Amendment declares that Congress shall make "no law…abridging the freedom 36 +AND 37 +will briefly describe the limited categories of so-called "unprotected speech." 38 + 39 +====Outweighs:==== 40 + 41 +====Fairness==== 42 + 43 +====Clash.==== 44 + 45 +====Voters==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-10 04:32:52.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Samantha Haas - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Benel Higuchi - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harker Manglik Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JANFEB - T Any - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Golden Desert
- Caselist.CitesClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,6 @@ 1 +A is the interpretation – the affirmative must defend public colleges and universities ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. 2 +B is the violation – they restrict corporate funding, which restricts speech indirectly – its not a specific form of restriction on speech 3 +C is the standards: 4 +1. Predictability 5 +2. Ground 6 +Voters - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-10 04:32:53.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Samantha Haas - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Benel Higuchi - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harker Manglik Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JANFEB - Effects-T - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Golden Desert
- Caselist.CitesClass[14]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,51 @@ 1 +==Hate Crimes DA== 2 + 3 +===DA Shell=== 4 + 5 +====The media hype regarding hate crimes doesn't see the full picture-Overall hate crimes are down in recent years. Bennett '16==== 6 +**Samuel Bennett. The State of Hate, in the US. 2016. http://www.samuelwbennett.com/the-state-of-hate/** 7 +This 2nd Annual State of Hate analysis has uncovered a few noteworthy trends. **Firstly** 8 +AND 9 +.7 of college campuses saw one or more hate crime reports. 10 + 11 +====Allowing racist speech encourages hate crimes—the causality is empirically verified. Katel '9==== 12 +**Katel 9 (Peter, staff writer @ CQ Researcher, "Hate Groups", https://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/news/Hate.pdf?n=1599)** 13 +There is also hard evidence to back up the link between demonization and violence. 14 +AND 15 +Iist of vioIent incidents inspired by ugly rhetoric that will certainly grow longer. 16 + 17 +====College age and profiles makes it a key breeding ground for hate groups—it's the core demographic. SPLC '2k==== 18 +**SPLC 2k (Southern Poverty Law Center, "COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES SEE INCREASE IN HATE CRIMES", https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2000/colleges-and-universities-see-increase-hate-crimes)** 19 +While these kinds of attacks seem incredible to **many**, the fact is that most 20 +AND 21 +, it is not so surprising that some students act in ugly ways. 22 + 23 +====Two Impacts: A) Race war in America. Alexander 12/2==== 24 +**Alexander 12/2 (Dean, professor/director of the Homeland Security Research Program at Western Illinois University, "Domestic Extremist Threats Face Trump Admin", http://www.hstoday.us/briefings/daily-news-analysis/single-article/special-domestic-extremist-threats-face-trump-admin/ddfd86597d91bfa41f5cc394a795c499.html)** 25 +The term domestic extremism means individuals or groups that follow a variant of ideologies that 26 +AND 27 +attack by an African American couple to kill police in Trussville, Alabama. 28 + 29 +====That is an independent impact that must be rejected on face. Challenging racism is a prior ethical question. Memmi '2k==== 30 +**Memmi 2k MEMMI Professor Emeritus of Sociology @ Unv. Of Paris Albert-; RACISM, translated by Steve Martinot, pp.163-165** 31 +The struggle against racism will be long, difficult, without intermission, without remission 32 +AND 33 +. True, it is a wager, but the stakes are irresistible. 34 + 35 +====B) Causes terrorism- Growing hate groups risk terrorism – US linkages are key. Holloway 11/18==== 36 +**Holloway 11/18 (Kali, staff @ AlterNet, in Salon, "Feeling validated by Donald Trump's win, German hate groups team up with right-wing American hate groups", http://www.salon.com/2016/11/18/german-hate-groups-are-teaming-up-with-right-wing-american-hate-groups-feeling-validated-by-trump_partner/)** 37 +Throughout his campaign, Donald Trump exploited existing racist and xenophobic sentiments across his base 38 +AND 39 +investigate these cells, if they exist, and to prevent any attacks." 40 + 41 +====Currently, the biggest terrorist threat to the US is white supremacist lone wolves —- they kill more Americans than jihadists and show more desire to use WMDs==== 42 +**Blair 14 **(Charles P. Blair, Senior Fellow on State and Non-State Threats for the Federation of American Scientists who teaches classes on terrorism and WMD technology at John Hopkins University and George Mason University, "Looking clearly at right-wing terrorism," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 9 June 2014, http://thebulletin.org/looking-clearly-right-wing-terrorism7232, *fc) 43 +Five years ago the US Department of Homeland Security's Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division released 44 +AND 45 +exaggerated, but neither should it be suppressed for political or ideological reasons. 46 + 47 +====Dispersion of technology enables lone wolf terrorists to access chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons (CBURNs) – the impact will be mass casualties and unprecedented disruption of financial and social systems==== 48 +**Ackerman and Pinson 14** ~~Gary A. ,Director of the Special Projects Division at the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START), University of Maryland, Lauren E., Senior Research/Project Manager at START and PhD student at Yale University, "An Army of One: Assessing CBRN Pursuit and Use by Lone Wolves and Autonomous Cells," Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol. 26, Issue 1, 2014~~ 49 +The first question to answer is whence the concerns about the nexus between CBRN weapons 50 +AND 51 +well influence the weapon selection of lone actor jihadists in Western nations. 19 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-10 04:35:39.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stephanie Cozzens - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Mia Rhineer - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +8 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harker Manglik Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JANFEB - Hate Crimes DA - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Golden Desert
- Caselist.RoundClass[6]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +11 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-10 04:25:39.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Matt Delateur - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Wyatt Alpert - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Golden Desert
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +12,13 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-10 04:32:50.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Samantha Haas - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Benel Higuchi - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,3 @@ 1 +1AC - plan text get rid of corporate funding 2 +1NC - t any and effects T 3 +1NR - t any and effects T - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Golden Desert
- Caselist.RoundClass[8]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +14 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-10 04:35:38.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stephanie Cozzens - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Mia Rhineer - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Golden Desert