Changes for page Harker Manglik Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:35
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[5]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-11-06 15:08:28. 2231 +2016-11-06 15:08:28.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[6]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,49 @@ 1 +===CP Shell=== 2 + 3 + 4 +====CP text- The United States Congress should ~~insert plan text here~~.==== 5 + 6 + 7 +====Only Congress solves- courts cannot create change, and unpopular decisions go unenforced. Berenji '8==== 8 +**Berenji 8** (Shahin Berenji, magna cum laude, political science at USC, 08, "The US Supreme Court: A "Follower, Not a Leader" of Social Change", http://www.lurj.org/article.php/vol3n1/supreme.xml) 9 +Lacking either government or popular support, however, the Court's decision was not enforced 10 +AND 11 +to this common pattern, those decisions were also fomented by national opinion. 12 + 13 + 14 +====Only the CP solves – Courts cannot create social change; they can only reinforce existing ideals. Berenji '8==== 15 +**Berenji 8** (Shahin Berenji, magna cum laude, political science at USC, 08, "The US Supreme Court: A "Follower, Not a Leader" of Social Change", http://www.lurj.org/article.php/vol3n1/supreme.xml) 16 +In the United States, the Supreme Court is the highest appellate court or legal 17 +AND 18 +the Supreme Court has implemented landmark policies usually based upon societal legal challenges. 19 + 20 + 21 +====Congress never upholds Supreme Court decisions – only the counterplan solves- history proves. Slocum '7==== 22 +**Slocum 7** (Brian, Assistant Professor of Law, Florida Coastal School of Law. J.D. @ Harvard Law School, "Reforming U.S. Immigration Policy: Courts vs. The Political Branches: Immigration "Reform" and The Battle for the Future of Immigration Law," 5 Geo. J.L. and Pub. Pol'y 509, Lexis) 23 +Both a decision striking down aspects of the administrative adjudication process on due process grounds 24 +AND 25 +which a single federal appellate judge could deny a petition for review.87 26 + 27 + 28 +====Only the counterplan solves - congress will override court decisions==== 29 + 30 + 31 +====Courts are bad at policymaking- they can't cause social change, and any attempt to do so undermines legitimacy. Yoo '96==== 32 +**Yoo 96 **(John Choon, professor in law and previous Dep. of Justice official, "Who Measures the Chancellor's Foot—The Inherent Remedial Authority of the Federal Courts", Cal. L. Rev., 84, p. 1137-1138) GSK 33 +Before I address the constitutional difficulties with the extensive use of far-reaching and 34 +AND 35 +impartiality and moral authority they need to persuade others to support their orders. 36 + 37 + 38 +====A weakened Supreme Court leads to massive rights violations- Korematsu proves—turns aff. Fontana '02==== 39 +David **Fontana, 2002**student of law at Yale and Oxford Universities, 2002. ~~The Connecticut Law Review, "A Case for the Twenty-First Century Constitutional Canon: Schneiderman v. United States," p. lexis, rwg~~ 40 +Most of the "greatest hits" of American wartime constitutional law—Korematsu v 41 +AND 42 +66~~ liberties and act in ways that we often later regret. n156 43 + 44 + 45 +====Legitimacy is key to prevent nuclear extinction, Kellman '89==== 46 +**Kellman 89** Barry Kellman (professor @ Depaul) December '89 Duke Law Journal 47 +In this era of thermonuclear weapons, America must uphold its historical commitment to be 48 +AND 49 +recognizable in a millennium ushered in under the mushroom cloud of thermonuclear holocaust. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-06 15:08:28.797 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +xx - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +xx - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harker Manglik Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - NOVDEC Congress CP - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +xx