| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,32 @@ |
|
1 |
+Securitizing logic manifests itself in a drive for certainty which causes endless violence- creates an epistemology and ontology of violence |
|
2 |
+Burke, 7 (Senior Lecturer in International Relations at the University of New South Wales at Sydney, Anthony, Johns Hopkins University Press, Ontologies of War: Violence, Existence and Reason, Project Muse) |
|
3 |
+This essay develops a theory about the causes of war ~-~- and thus aims to |
|
4 |
+AND |
|
5 |
+supplied by the ontological claim to national existence, security, or order. |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+However in practice, technique quickly passes into ontology. This it does in two |
|
8 |
+AND |
|
9 |
+more sustainable, peaceful and non-violent global rule of the political. |
|
10 |
+Hegemony is a paranoid fantasy~-~--the strategy omnipotence sees threats to empire everywhere, which necessitates constant violence~-~--you have an obligation to place the structural violence that hegemony invisibilizes at the core of your decision calculus |
|
11 |
+McClintock 9—chaired prof of English and Women’s and Gender Studies at UW–Madison. MPhil from Cambridge; PhD from Columbia (Anne, Paranoid Empire: Specters from Guantánamo and Abu Ghraib, Small Axe Mar2009, Issue 28, p50-74) |
|
12 |
+By now it is fair to say that the United States has come to be |
|
13 |
+AND |
|
14 |
+cost of catastrophic self-delusion and the infliction of great calamities elsewhere. |
|
15 |
+I have come to feel that we urgently need to make visible (the better |
|
16 |
+AND |
|
17 |
+come to characterize the United States as a super-carceral state. 5 |
|
18 |
+Can we, the uneasy heirs of empire, now speak only of national things |
|
19 |
+AND |
|
20 |
+. Rather, the force of empire comes to reconfigure, from within, |
|
21 |
+Prolif is an epistemological excuse for violence – their discourse wrecks alternative approaches – and trades off with structural violence |
|
22 |
+Woods 7 Matthew, PhD in IR @ Brown - Researcher @ Thomas Watson Institute of International Relations Journal of Language and Politics 6.1“Unnatural Acts: Nuclear Language, proliferation, and order,” p. 116-7 |
|
23 |
+It is important to identify, expose and understand the successful creation of 'proliferation' as |
|
24 |
+AND |
|
25 |
+realizes its ideological preferences while marginalizing other possibilities and co-opting subordinates. |
|
26 |
+Their fixation on those national interests and apocalyptic scenarios justifies endless violence, totalitarianism, and nuclear war— the alternative is an intellectual criticism of their securitizing representations |
|
27 |
+Ahmed 12 Dr. Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed is Executive Director of the Institute for Policy Research and Development (IPRD), an independent think tank focused on the study of violent conflict, he has taught at the Department of International Relations, University of Sussex "The international relations of crisis and the crisis of international relations: from the securitisation of scarcity to the militarisation of society" Global Change, Peace and Security Volume 23, Issue 3, 2011 Taylor Francis |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+While recommendations to shift our frame of orientation away from conventional state-centrism toward |
|
30 |
+AND |
|
31 |
+of state security planning in the context of counter-terrorism operations abroad. |
|
32 |
+The intensifying problematisation and externalisation of Muslim-majority regions and populations by Western security |