Changes for page Harker Malyugina Aff
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 6 added, 1 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,0 @@ 1 -Hey! 2 - 3 -17mariam@students.harker.org or Emmiee Malyugina on facebook. I check my email more frequently though. Hit me up to ask for any positions I've read or past strats. 4 - 5 -*Apple Valley Note ~-~-- I'm having wifi issues so if something's not disclosed, I'm sorry. Come talk to me in person and I'll answer questions. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-05 06:01:14.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -idk - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -idk - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harker Malyugina Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0 - Contact Info - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Contact
- Caselist.CitesClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,3 @@ 1 +Hey! 2 + 3 +17mariam@students.harker.org or Emu Malyugina on facebook. I check my email more frequently though. Hit me up to ask for any positions I've read or past strats. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-19 20:59:15.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +13 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harker Malyugina Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 - Contact Info - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Contact
- Caselist.CitesClass[14]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,61 @@ 1 +Framework 6:00 2 +0:40 The political process has changed – instead of trying to engage with society, we have become fixated on symbolic gestures and looking to personal ethics, leading to serial policy failure and the War on Terror. We need to engage with concrete action not ‘me-search’ and radical utopias 3 +Chandler 7 (David Chandler – Professor of International Relations and the Director of the Centre for the Study of Democracy at the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of Westminster. He’s also the founding editor of the Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, “The Attraction of Post-Territorial Politics: Ethics and Activism in the International Sphere (The Inaugural Lecture of Professor David Chandler)”, http://www.davidchandler.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Inaugural-lecture.pdf, pgs. 1-9, EmmieeM) 4 +Introduction. It seems that our engagement with and understanding of politics is increasingly shaped 5 +AND 6 +, critique, and ultimately overcome the practices and subjectivities of our time. 7 +0:18 Focus on big, apocalyptic scenarios justifies all atrocities carried out in the name of avoiding them – prefer being an intellectual coming up with methodologies for change rather than feeding the security machine 8 +Matheson 15 (Calum Matheson – This is his PhD dissertation at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, “Desired Ground Zeros: Nuclear Imagination and the Death Drive”, https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/indexablecontent/uuid:4bbcb13b-0b5f-43a1-884c-fcd6e6411fd6, pg. 187-189, EmmieeM) 9 +The danger of seeking the Real of nuclear warfare in language is that the inevitable 10 +AND 11 +the impossibility of an eventual triumph of automaton against the caprice of tuché. 12 +0:22 Challenging background beliefs about security measures is a prior question because educational spaces like debate is where knowledge about war is created and asserted. Acting as a critical outsider within public spaces is crucial to changing prevailing beliefs and practices 13 +Crawford 16 (Neta C Crawford is a professor of Political Science at Boston University who focuses on international relations theory and discourse ethics. She has won the American Political Science Association Jervis and Schroeder Award for her writings on international politics. She has been published in numerous scholarly journals and books, in addition to having served as the chair of the International Studies Association, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, “What is war good for? Background ideas and assumptions about the legitimacy, utility, and costs of offensive war”, http://bpi.sagepub.com/content/18/2/282.full.pdf+html, pages 286-288, EmmieeM) 14 +While the deeper background ideas about war are not routinely surfaces, foregrounded, and 15 +AND 16 +has been the case with assumptions about the legitimacy and utility of war. 17 +0:25 Questioning the legitimacy of war and securitization is key to deconstruct the background ideas that shape the development of tactics, research, and weapons. Thus the role of the ballot is to vote for the debater that best deconstructs the security state through policy action 18 +Crawford 16 (Neta C Crawford is a professor of Political Science at Boston University who focuses on international relations theory and discourse ethics. She has won the American Political Science Association Jervis and Schroeder Award for her writings on international politics. She has been published in numerous scholarly journals and books, in addition to having served as the chair of the International Studies Association, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, “What is war good for? Background ideas and assumptions about the legitimacy, utility, and costs of offensive war”, http://bpi.sagepub.com/content/18/2/282.full.pdf+html, pages 284-186, EmmieeM) 19 +War is defined as the use of military force to achieve a political objective. 20 +AND 21 +may be rarely expressed in explicit propositional form among the politically dominant classes. 22 +Offense 4:10 23 +0:38 Colleges are the newest target of the security state – the perception that universities are uniquely capable of supporting democracy and dissent over the War on Terror and free enterprise drives right-wing extremists to enforce censorship, under the guise of advancing tolerance and rights 24 +Giroux 6 (Henry A. Giroux – one of the founding theorists of critical pedagogy, PhD from Carnegie, was a professor at Boston University and scholar at Miami University. Was the founding Director of the Center for Education and Cultural Studies. Published by John Hopkins University Press, “Academic Freedom Under FIre: The Case for Critical Pedagogy, pgs. 1 – 9, http://muse.jhu.edu/article/203608/pdf, EmmieeM) 25 +Higher education in the United States appears to be caught in a strange contradiction. 26 +AND 27 +the best talent to American universities” (Jonathan Cole 2005b, B7). 28 +1:22 The dissenter has become the terrorist to be eradicated – the security state has transformed college censorship into a tool of suppression for radical or brown students under the pretense of enforcing diversity and tolerance for right-wing students. Absent analysis of the War on Terror, liberation becomes impossible because struggles for racial or gender equality becomes coopted to further Islamaphobia and Middle East interventionism. 29 +Chatterjee 14 (Piya Chatterjee – Gender and Woman’s Studies Chair of the Feminist, 30 +AND 31 +20and20Sunaina20Maira.pdf, “Academic Containment”, EmmieeM) 32 +State warfare and militarism have shored up deeply powerful notions of patriotism, intertwined with 33 +AND 34 +the mission of higher education and the future of the nation-state. 35 +0:35 Security thrives on insecurity – the state fabricates dangerous “Others” to justify endless warfare in order to sustain hegemony and the myth of perpetual threats. Any weighing calculus that fails to account for the invisible violence happening in the status quo is epistemologically flawed – only through acknowledging that the War on Terror is fueled by the torture and slaughter of ordinary citizens can we deconstruct securitization. 36 +McClintock 9 (Anne McClintock – B.A in English from University of Cape Town; M.Phil in Linguistics at the University of Cambridge; PhD in English Literature from Columbia; previous Associate Professor of Gender and Cultural Studies at Columbia“Paranoid Empire: Specters From Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib”, pgs. 50-54, http://english110fall2014leroy.qwriting.qc.cuny.edu/files/2014/06/13.1.mcclintock.pdf, EmmieeM) 37 +The question is still open: what is the purpose of Guantanamo Bay? Is 38 +AND 39 +contradictory sites where imperial racism, sexuality, and gender catastrophically collide.11 40 +0:10 Thus, the plan. Resolved: Public colleges and universities ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. 41 +Downs 4 (Donald Alexander Downs – Professor of Political Science, Law and Journalism at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, and Research Fellow at the Independent Institute, Oakland, California. He has won the Annisfield-Wolf Book Award, the Gladys M. Kammerer Award of the American Political Science Association, and has been in published in journals, encyclopedias, and professional books. “Restoring Free Speech and Liberty on Campus”, pgs. Xx – xxi, http://www.thedivineconspiracy.org/Z5243N.pdf, EmmieeM) 42 +During most of the twentieth century, threats to campus free speech and academic freedom 43 +AND 44 +commitment on campus can help to bring about this retrieval of liberal principles. 45 +Solvency 1:20 46 +0:47 The affirmative is an act of carpentry – the world is a really messed up place, but you cannot deny the existence of 6 billion people who cannot survive absent infrastructure and networks that provide food, transportation, and medicine. Empty critiques and radical upheavals devoid of concrete proposals are incomprehensible, doomed to failure, and drive people towards reigning ideology 47 +Bryant 12 — Levi R. Bryant, Professor of Philosophy at Collin College, holds a Ph.D. in Philosophy from Loyola University in Chicago, 2012 (“Underpants Gnomes: A Critique of the Academic Left,” Larval Subjects—Levi R. Bryant’s philosophy blog, November 11th, Available Online at http://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2012/11/11/underpants-gnomes-a-critique-of-the-academic-left/, Accessed 02-21-2014) 48 +I must be in a mood today–half irritated, half amused–because 49 +AND 50 +. Instead we prefer to shout and denounce. Good luck with that. 51 + 52 +0:36 The security state operates on a binary where people are either complacent allies or dissenters to be suppressed at all costs – by framing unsavory speech acts as coming from people who are our equals and share more similarities than differences rather than evil “Others” to be destroyed, the affirmative avoids cooption of “protection” movements and the antagonisms that drive war. Anything other than complete rejection hyperlinks to the impacts of the AFF. 53 +Ivie 5 (Robert L. Ivie – PhD in Rhetoric and Communication at WashU, “Democratic Dissent and the Trick of Rhetorical Critique”, “Dissent as a Form of Struggle” – entire section, pg. 279 – 280, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.832.4092andrep=rep1andtype=pdf, EmmieeM) 54 +Democracy’s formidable challenge may be most clearly indicated on the occasion of war. War 55 +AND 56 +polity of adversaries and thus no politics, only forced unity and unmitigated enmity 57 + 58 + 59 +that is the end of politics, per se. The depoliticized alternatives to dissent 60 +AND 61 +it is otherwise curtailed and constrained by a regime of crisis and war? - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-13 00:56:18.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Connor Engell - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +14 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harker Malyugina Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JF - War on Terror AFF - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard Westlake RR
- Caselist.CitesClass[15]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,54 @@ 1 +The political process has changed – instead of trying to engage with society, we have become fixated on symbolic gestures and looking to personal ethics, leading to serial policy failure and the War on Terror. We need to engage with concrete action not ‘me-search’ and radical utopias. Thus the role of the ballot is to vote for the debater that best deconstructs the security state through policy action. 2 +Chandler 7 (David Chandler – Professor of International Relations and the Director of the Centre for the Study of Democracy at the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of Westminster. He’s also the founding editor of the Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, “The Attraction of Post-Territorial Politics: Ethics and Activism in the International Sphere (The Inaugural Lecture of Professor David Chandler)”, http://www.davidchandler.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Inaugural-lecture.pdf, pgs. 1-9, EmmieeM) 3 +Introduction. It seems that our engagement with and understanding of politics is increasingly shaped 4 +AND 5 +, critique, and ultimately overcome the practices and subjectivities of our time. 6 +Thus, the plan. Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. 7 +Downs 4 (Donald Alexander Downs – Professor of Political Science, Law and Journalism at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, and Research Fellow at the Independent Institute, Oakland, California. He has won the Annisfield-Wolf Book Award, the Gladys M. Kammerer Award of the American Political Science Association, and has been in published in journals, encyclopedias, and professional books. “Restoring Free Speech and Liberty on Campus”, pgs. Xx – xxi, http://www.thedivineconspiracy.org/Z5243N.pdf, EmmieeM) 8 +During most of the twentieth century, threats to campus free speech and academic freedom 9 +AND 10 +commitment on campus can help to bring about this retrieval of liberal principles. 11 +Recognition 5:05 12 +Colleges are the newest target of the security state – the perception that universities are uniquely capable of supporting democracy and dissent over the War on Terror and free enterprise drives right-wing extremists to enforce censorship, under the guise of advancing tolerance and rights 13 +Giroux 6 (Henry A. Giroux – one of the founding theorists of critical pedagogy, PhD from Carnegie, was a professor at Boston University and scholar at Miami University. Was the founding Director of the Center for Education and Cultural Studies. Published by John Hopkins University Press, “Academic Freedom Under FIre: The Case for Critical Pedagogy, pgs. 1 – 9, http://muse.jhu.edu/article/203608/pdf, EmmieeM) 14 +Higher education in the United States appears to be caught in a strange contradiction. 15 +AND 16 +the best talent to American universities” (Jonathan Cole 2005b, B7). 17 +The dissenter has become the terrorist to be eradicated – the security state has transformed college censorship into a tool of suppression for radical or brown students under the pretense of enforcing diversity and tolerance for right-wing students. Absent analysis of the War on Terror, liberation becomes impossible because struggles for racial or gender equality becomes coopted to further Islamaphobia and Middle East interventionism. 18 +Chatterjee 14 (Piya Chatterjee – Gender and Woman’s Studies Chair of the Feminist, 19 +AND 20 +20and20Sunaina20Maira.pdf, “Academic Containment”, EmmieeM) 21 +State warfare and militarism have shored up deeply powerful notions of patriotism, intertwined with 22 +AND 23 +the mission of higher education and the future of the nation-state. 24 +Any form of free speech restrictions leads to massive overreach and censorship of minority movements – empirically proven 25 +Gey 98 (Steven G. Gey – John W. and Ashley E. Frost Professor of Law, Florida State University College of Law, “Postmodern Censorship Revisited: A Reply to Richard Delgado”, “Professor Delgado and the Problem of Government Overreaching” – partway through, EmmieeM) 26 +Professor Delgado responds to the problem of controlling the application of speech-regulation statues 27 +AND 28 +in a "deliberate, planned extermination or attempted extermination of a people." 29 +Security thrives on insecurity – the state fabricates dangerous “Others” to justify endless warfare in order to sustain hegemony and the myth of perpetual threats. Any weighing calculus that fails to account for the invisible violence happening in the status quo is epistemologically flawed – only through acknowledging that the War on Terror is fueled by the torture and slaughter of ordinary citizens can we deconstruct securitization. 30 +McClintock 9 (Anne McClintock – B.A in English from University of Cape Town; M.Phil in Linguistics at the University of Cambridge; PhD in English Literature from Columbia; previous Associate Professor of Gender and Cultural Studies at Columbia“Paranoid Empire: Specters From Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib”, pgs. 50-54, http://english110fall2014leroy.qwriting.qc.cuny.edu/files/2014/06/13.1.mcclintock.pdf, EmmieeM) 31 +The question is still open: what is the purpose of Guantanamo Bay? Is 32 +AND 33 +contradictory sites where imperial racism, sexuality, and gender catastrophically collide.11 34 +Free speech codes shut down campus criticism and replace it with government-approved propaganda – there’s a massive spillover effect because journalism grads lose the ability to pursue controversial pieces and censorship becomes normalized 35 +Sanders 6 (Chris Sanders – University of Arizona Law Review, “Censorship 101: Anti-Hazelwood Laws and the Preservation of Free Speech at Colleges and Universities”, “Say no More: Hazelwood’s Dangers For College Students’ Free Expression” – through the end of “Too Much Freedom: How the Extension of Hazelwood to Universities Could Endanger the Future of the First Amendment”, pgs. 171 – 173, https://www.law.ua.edu/pubs/lrarticles/Volume2058/Issue201/sanders.pdf , EmmieeM) 36 +Post-Hazelwood censorship disputes have not been limited to high schools; a number 37 +AND 38 +” speech is nothing more than a distant memory from an earlier time. 39 +Discourse is a pre-requisite to change – relationships must first be made visible before reformation can occur 40 +Wingenbach 11 (Ed, Notre Dame Government and international studies PhD, “Institutionalizing Agonistic Democracy,” pg 190-198, https://books.google.com/books?id=7-8JrC64UgwCandprintsec=frontcover//LADI) 41 +Third, because Knops ignores the situated source of antagonism and the persistence of hegemony 42 +AND 43 +opened up to greater contestation, generosity, and active re-constitution. 44 +Underview 1:14 45 +The affirmative is an act of carpentry – the world is a really messed up place, but you cannot deny the existence of 6 billion people who cannot survive absent infrastructure and networks that provide food, transportation, and medicine. Empty critiques and radical upheavals devoid of concrete proposals are incomprehensible, doomed to failure, and drive people towards reigning ideology 46 +Bryant 12 — Levi R. Bryant, Professor of Philosophy at Collin College, holds a Ph.D. in Philosophy from Loyola University in Chicago, 2012 (“Underpants Gnomes: A Critique of the Academic Left,” Larval Subjects—Levi R. Bryant’s philosophy blog, November 11th, Available Online at http://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2012/11/11/underpants-gnomes-a-critique-of-the-academic-left/, Accessed 02-21-2014) 47 +I must be in a mood today–half irritated, half amused–because 48 +AND 49 +. Instead we prefer to shout and denounce. Good luck with that. 50 +Totalizing accounts of power freeze resistance – working within structures of power creates spaces of meaning contra oppressive scripts. 51 +Zanotti 13 (Laura, Ph.D., Virginia Tech, “Governmentality, Ontology, Methodology: Re-thinking Political Agency in the Global World,” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 201X, Vol XX(X) 1–17) 52 +Political agency is not portrayed as the free subjects’ total rejection of a unified totalizing 53 +AND 54 +position leads not to apathy but to hyper- and pessimistic activism.’’ - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-04 20:38:40.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +15 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harker Malyugina Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JF - War on Terror v2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Golden Desert
- Caselist.RoundClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +13 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-19 20:59:13.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Contact
- Caselist.RoundClass[14]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +14 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-13 00:56:16.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Connor Engell - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard Westlake RR
- Caselist.RoundClass[15]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +15 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-04 20:38:37.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Golden Desert