Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[5]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[8]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[5]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-10-31 18:08:45.967
	1	+2016-10-31 18:08:45.0

Caselist.CitesClass[8]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,35 @@
	1	+====Interpretation: the affirmative must defend that countries prohibit the production of nuclear power.====
	2	+
	3	+====First, Resolved implies a policy ====
	4	+Louisiana House** 3-8-**2005**, **http://house.louisiana.gov/house-glossary.htm** **
	5	+Resolution A legislative instrument that generally is used for making declarations, stating policies, and making decisions where some other form is not required. A bill includes the constitutionally required enacting clause; a resolution uses the term "resolved". Not subject to a time limit for introduction nor to governor~’s veto. ( Const. Art. III, §17(B) and House Rules 8.11 , 13.1 , 6.8 , and 7.4)
	6	+
	7	+====Second, Prohibit is to legally prohibit====
	8	+(http://www.dictionary.com/browse/prohibit, EmmieeM)
	9	+to forbid (an action, activity, etc.) by authority or law:
	10	+
	11	+====B is the violation: The affirmative violates this interpretation because they do not advocate a fiated piece of legislation from a country~’s government that prohibits the production of nuclear power. Also, they are EXTRA TOPICAL – CX concessions prove the individuals will also reject capitalism.====
	12	+
	13	+====C is reasons to prefer====
	14	+
	15	+====1^^st^^ – procedural fairness – the affirmative~’s interpretation lets them talk about anything. It~’s 100 unpredictable – the affirmative can change from round to round, making it entirely unpredictable. Fairness is also the strongest internal link to education because if debate is not fair, then balance is not possible. It is not possible to research the topic if I do not know what the topic is.====
	16	+
	17	+====2 – Decisions-making: Debate over a controversial point of action creates argumentative stasis—that~’s key to avoid a devolution of debate into competing truth claims, which destroys the decision-making benefits of the activity====
	18	+**Steinberg 26 Freeley 13 (**David Director of Debate at U Miami, Former President of CEDA, officer, American Forensic Association and National Communication Association. Lecturer in Communication studies and rhetoric. Advisor to Miami Urban Debate League, Masters in Communication, and Austin, JD, Suffolk University, attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, Argumentation and Debate Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, Thirteen Edition)
	19	+Debate is a means of settling differences, so there must be a controversy,
	20	+AND
	21	+particular point of difference, which will be outlined in the following discussion.
	22	+
	23	+====Stasis is the internal link to solving the aff – Debate has the ability to change people~’s attitudes because it forces pre-round internal deliberation on a focused topic of debate====
	24	+**Goodin 26 Niemeyer 3** – Australian National University (Robert and Simon, "When Does Deliberation Begin? Internal Reflection versus Public Discussion in Deliberative Democracy" Political Studies, Vol 50, p 627-649, WileyInterscience)
	25	+What happened in this particular case, as in any particular case, was in
	26	+AND
	27	+least one possible way of doing that for each of those key features.
	28	+
	29	+====3 - Predictable limits are critical to skill-building that~’s crucial to problem-solving – Only effective skills solve the aff====
	30	+**Goodin 26** **Niemeyer 3** (Robert 26 Simon, Australian National University When Does Deliberation Begin? Internal Reflection versus Public Discussion in Deliberative Democracy, POLITICAL STUDIES: 2003 VOL 51, 627–649, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0032-3217.2003.00450.x/pdf)
	31	+What happened in this particular case, as in any particular case, was in
	32	+AND
	33	+least one possible way of doing that for each of those key features.
	34	+
	35	+====d. T is a voter for fairness and education as well as pedagogical reasons.====

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-10-31 18:08:47.487

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Rory Jacobson, Ashan Peiris, Nick Steele

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Eastside Catholic DC

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+5

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Doubles

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harker Lu Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+SectOct - T - Implementation

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Meadows