| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,16 @@ |
|
1 |
+1NC Shell |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+===Plan text: Countries ought to prohibit the production of nuclear power using non-modular power plants over 1000 megawatts in size. === |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+===The CP PIC’s out of small modular reactors – it’s plan minus and solves the aff’s harms. |
|
6 |
+SMR’s create safer, cleaner energy and have high potential for smaller developing countries. === |
|
7 |
+Rosner and Goldberg 11, Robert Rosner and Stephen Goldberg, “Small Modular Reactors – Key to Future Nuclear Power Generation in the U.S.,” Energy Policy Institute at Chicago The Harris School of Public Policy Studies, November 2011, ghs//BZ |
|
8 |
+Nuclear power occupies a unique position in the debate over global climate change as the |
|
9 |
+AND |
|
10 |
+analysis would be done shortly that will address the relative competitiveness of SMRs. |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+===SMRs solve case and warming – they’re cheaper, easier and faster to make, more resistant to prolif, meltdowns, and waste mismanagement=== |
|
13 |
+Iyer et al 14 - Gokul Iyer, Nathan Hultman, and Steve Fetter of the School of Public Policy, University of Maryland, Son H. Kim of the Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and University of Maryland: 6 July 2014 (“Implications of small modular reactors for climate change mitigation” Elseiver Ltd. Journal of Energy Economics, p. 1, Available Online at http://www.karnteknik.se/upload/aktiviteter/medlemsaktiviteter/20151009_Staffan20Qvists20Energy20Policy.pdf, Accessed 8/8/16)IG |
|
14 |
+Achieving climate policy targets will require large-scale deployment of low-carbon energy |
|
15 |
+AND |
|
16 |
+loss in the infant pe- riod (Hansen et al., 2003). |