| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,21 @@ |
|
1 |
+====A~~ Interpretation: Debaters must, on the page with their name and the school they attend, disclose all taglines, full citations, and the first and last three words of the pieces of evidence read in their cases on the NDCA wiki at least one hour before the round if they have read that case before.==== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+====B~~ Violation: ==== |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+====C~~ Net Benefits:==== |
|
8 |
+1~~ Research |
|
9 |
+Nails 13 - (Jacob ~~I am a policy debater at Georgia State University. I debated LD for 4 years for Starr's Mill High School (GA) and graduated in 2012.~~ "A Defense of Disclosure (Including Third-Party Disclosure)" http://nsdupdate.com/2013/a-defense-of-disclosure-including-third-party-disclosure-by-jacob-nails/) GHS//GB |
|
10 |
+I fall squarely on the side of disclosure. I find that the largest advantage |
|
11 |
+AND |
|
12 |
+LD in the status quo doesn't incentivize better debating. |
|
13 |
+2~~ Clash |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+====Voters: ==== |
|
17 |
+Education |
|
18 |
+Advocacy Skills |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+====D~~ Implication: Drop the debater on theory.==== |