Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[12]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[12]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,19 +1,0 @@
1		-====The 1AC’s framing of terror threats reproduces national security mindsets that justify military intervention abroad====
2		-Friedman ’16 (Uri, July 2nd, ***brackets for gendered language, staff writer at The Atlantic, where he covers global affairs, “What If the Terrorists Are Already Here?”, The Atlantic, http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/07/america-terrorism-national-security/489872/~-~-ghs//sk)
3		-The statistics are as astounding as they are ignored: Americans are about as likely
4		-AND
5		-about the questions that you’re raising … from the perspective of homeland security.”
6		-
7		-====Framing of countries as “the other” or as “the enemy” justifies violent policy action against them====
8		-Geis and Wunderlich ’14 (Anna and Carmen, July 2014 issue, Geis is Department of Political Science, University of Magdeburg, Wunderlich is Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, “The good, the bad, and the ugly: Comparing the notions of ‘rogue’ and ‘evil’ in international politics”, Springer Link International Politics, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/ip.2014.19~-~-ghs//sk)
9		-The identification and naming of an ‘enemy’ is an age-old element within
10		-AND
11		-towards interventionist strategies (Herrmann and Keller, 2004, p. 577).
12		-
13		-====The alternative is to reject the aff and engage in an analysis of the language behind our policymaking to rupture dominant norms====
14		-Cheeseman and Bruce ’96 Graeme Cheeseman, Sr. Lecturer @ New South Wales, and Robert Bruce Assoc. Prof in social sciences @ Curtin univ, ‘96 (Discourses of Danger and Dread Frontiers, p. 5-9, https://books.google.com/books?id=jJ3RWY-bzzsC~-~-ghs//sk)
15		-This goal is pursued in ways which are still unconventional in the intellectual milieu of
16		-AND
17		-resistant to them, or choose not to understand them, and why?
18		-
19		-====Thus, THE ROB IS TO QUESTION THE 1AC’S SCHOLARSHIP PRIOR TO THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE PLAN.====

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-09-17 14:11:32.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Jacob Koshak, Byron Arthur

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Westwood SN

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-12

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-5

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Greenhill Krishnan Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-SEPOCT- Security K

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Greenhill RR