| ... |
... |
@@ -1,13
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-====Plan text: Countries ought to prohibit land-based nuclear power plants and dispose of waste in the seabed. |
| 2 |
|
-The CP advocates for floating power plants – it solves for the aff’s harms but keep the unique benefits of nuclear power. |
| 3 |
|
-Floating nuclear reactors solve for the aff’s harms: they avoid meltdown disasters, health risks to local populations, escape of waste, high costs, etc.==== |
| 4 |
|
-David Chandler ‘14 writer for MIT News, “Floating nuclear plants could ride out tsunamis,” MIT News, April 16, 2014, GHS//RG |
| 5 |
|
-When an earthquake and tsunami struck the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant complex in 2011, |
| 6 |
|
-AND |
| 7 |
|
-the authors have the answers to each question and the answers are realistic.” |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-====Using subsea burial will solve the problem of disposing with nuclear waste.==== |
| 10 |
|
-Hollister ‘97 (Charles D. Hollister and Steven Nadis, “Burial of Radioactive Waste under the Seabed,” Scientific American, , 1997, https://www.uvm.edu/~pbierman/classes/gradsem/2008/radwaste.pdf) |
| 11 |
|
-What is more, the clay-rich muds that would entomb the radioactive materials |
| 12 |
|
-AND |
| 13 |
|
-), who conceived of the idea of sub-seabed disposal in 1973. |