| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,13 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Plan text: Countries ought to prohibit land-based nuclear power plants and dispose of waste in the seabed. |
|
2 |
+The CP advocates for floating power plants – it solves for the aff’s harms but keep the unique benefits of nuclear power. |
|
3 |
+Floating nuclear reactors solve for the aff’s harms: they avoid meltdown disasters, health risks to local populations, escape of waste, high costs, etc.==== |
|
4 |
+David Chandler ‘14 writer for MIT News, “Floating nuclear plants could ride out tsunamis,” MIT News, April 16, 2014, GHS//RG |
|
5 |
+When an earthquake and tsunami struck the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant complex in 2011, |
|
6 |
+AND |
|
7 |
+the authors have the answers to each question and the answers are realistic.” |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+====Using subsea burial will solve the problem of disposing with nuclear waste.==== |
|
10 |
+Hollister ‘97 (Charles D. Hollister and Steven Nadis, “Burial of Radioactive Waste under the Seabed,” Scientific American, , 1997, https://www.uvm.edu/~pbierman/classes/gradsem/2008/radwaste.pdf) |
|
11 |
+What is more, the clay-rich muds that would entomb the radioactive materials |
|
12 |
+AND |
|
13 |
+), who conceived of the idea of sub-seabed disposal in 1973. |