Changes for page Greenhill Krishnan Neg
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 7 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[65]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,46 +1,0 @@ 1 -====NOBODY IS INNOCENT WHEN ANTI-BLACK RACISM HAS OCCURRED 2 -The process of debate is not free from the lens of racial bias. An activity that is painted with the brush of whiteness is not devoid of prejudicial, subjective and preferential decisions that privilege white presence and students at the expense of black bodies. Our argument will be that institutional racism has moved beyond OVERT forms of discrimination and individual bigotry shifting to a COVERT and more insidious form of exclusion that is difficult to measure, RACISM WITHOUT RACISTS. 3 - 4 -THE CONFRONTATION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF PRIVILEGE ALSO EXTENDS TO THE JUDGE IN THE BACK OF THE ROOM!!!!!!! 5 - 6 -All of you as judges have the responsibility to stand for something your ballots become norms in the community it is never ok to discriminate against black people and all who are related to this discrimination should be punished. 7 - 8 -Aversive Racism is unconscious and is more likely to lead to discriminatory decisions when the choices are not clear-cut and competing arguments are flying about. In the game of debate this means that in close decisions our race based arguments from our social location are more likely to be pushed to the margins and our personal convictions isolated to the periphery. 9 - 10 -The decision becomes an averted way to say I don’t feel comfortable voting for your personal race based arguments usually coming across as “you dropped this or that argument” or “if you had only said XYZ” you would have won. 11 - 12 -OR WE FELT UNCOMFORTABLE HAVING THAT BLACK GUY JUDGE US 13 - 14 -====The role of the judge is to be an educator in the debate space—that requires rejecting debaters who performativity or methodologically justify racism—WE DON’T EXIST IN A VACCUM==== 15 -Vincent 13 – (Christopher Debate Coach, former college NDT debater “Re-Conceptualizing Our Performances: Accountability In Lincoln Douglas Debate” http://victorybriefs.com/vbd/2013/10/re-conceptualizing-our-performances-accountability-in-lincoln-douglas-debate) GHS//GB 16 -Charles Mills argues that “the moral concerns of African Americans have centered on the 17 -AND 18 -color, and in turn destroy the transformative potential this community could have. 19 - 20 -====Faced with complex decisions aversive racists feel doubt about a BLACK person and attribute that doubt to other areas==== 21 - 22 -====This is especially important at the NDCA tournament that has made a direct attempt at increasing diversity in both policy and Lincoln Douglas==== 23 -Kristoff op ed columnist for the NY TIMES 2k8 24 -Nicholas- (w) 2 time Pulitzer Prize winner, former Associate Managing editor of the Times, member of the NYT staff since 1984; Racism Without Racists; NYTIMES; Oct. 4; op-ed column; http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/05/opinion/05kristof.html 25 -One of the fallacies this election season is that if Barack Obama is paying an 26 -AND 27 -1960. ¶ It just might happen again, this time with race. 28 - 29 -====AS THE JUDGE YOU HAVE A CHANCE TO USE YOUR BALLOT AS A WAY OF CONFRONTING UNCONSCIOUS BIAS THAT I HAVE BROUGHT TO LIGHT. A VOTE FOR THE NEGATIVE IS A VOTE FOR REJECTING THIS INSIDIOUS FORM OF RACISM THAT DENIES IS OPPRESIVE STATUS IN A SOCIETY THAT TURNS AWAY FROM THE PLIGHT OF THE BLACK BODY. 30 - 31 -The exclusion of black adjudicators kills the integrity of debate and mask racism this is exactly what happened. In this debate, they are the prosecutor, you are the Justice Department and I am the defense, THE Equal justice initiative ’10,==== 32 -llegal Racial Discrimination in Jury Selection:¶ A Continuing Legacy¶ Equal Justice Initiative¶ The Equal Justice Initiative is a non-profit law organization with headquarters in¶ Montgomery, Alabama.¶ For more information, please contact:¶ Equal Justice Initiative¶ 122 Commerce Street¶ Montgomery, Alabama 36104¶ (334) 269-1803¶ www.eji.org¶ Email: raceandjury@eji.org¶ August 2010, http://www.eji.org/files/EJI20Race20and20Jury20Report.pdf 33 -The 1875 Civil Rights Act outlawed race-based discrimination in jury service, but 34 -AND 35 -diversity absolutely critical¶ to preserving the credibility of the criminal justice system. 36 -====THE NDCA TOURNAMENT MADE A CONSCIOUS EFFORT TO HIRE BLACK JUDGES AND MAKE DEBATE A MORE INCLUSIVE SPACE. WHEN YOU STRIKE ALL OF THEM, YOU CREATE AN INCENTIVE FOR TOURNAMENT DIRECTORS TO NOT HIRE BLACK JUDGES BECAUSE THEY BELIEVE THEY WON’T BE USED. THIS CONTINUES THE CYCLE OF OPPRESSION THAT I HAVE MADE VISIBLE. 37 - 38 -HE’S GOING TO SAY THE STRIKE TO NOT RANK HIGH ENOUGH TO NOT END UP ON A PANEL: ALSTON, SUNHEE, NADIA, THE CEDA AND NDT CHAMPION AND TOP SPEAKER IS ALL BASED ON STYLISTIC DIFFERENCE… IT’S ALWAYS SOMETHING ELSE! 39 -AND THAT’S EXACTLY OUR ARGUMENT. FOLLOWING THE ANALOGY OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, THEIR REASONS ARE MERELY MASKS AND DISGUISES FOR THEIR ATTEMPT TO AVOID VIOLATING THE ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAW. OF COURSE IT WAS A STRATEGIC DECISION, YOU DON’T WANT TO CONFRONT YOUR WHITE PRIVILEGE SO YOU EXCLUDE THE VOICES WHO WOULD FORCE YOU TO. 40 -IF THERE IS A SHRED OF DOUBT IN YOUR MIND THAT THE REASON SUNHEE, ALSTON, DEVANE, AND NADIA, ALL OF WHICH ARE MORE THAN QUALIFIED TO BE JUDGING THESE DEBATES, ARE NOT ON THIS PANEL BECAUSE THEY HAVE CHOSEN TO STRIKE THEM THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE TOURNAMENT, THEN YOU SHOULD VOTE NEG. 41 - 42 -THEY WILL BE UNABLE TO GIVE A SINGLE REASON THAT IS NOT MOTIVATED BY RACE AS TO WHY THE BLACK JUDGES HAVE WERE BARRED FROM BEING ON THIS PANEL. 43 - 44 -NOT PREFF BLACK MEANS NO INCENTIVE TO HIRE, THEY DON’T THINK THEYL BE USED, SELF PERPETUATING CYCLE 45 - 46 -WHY DOES THIS MATTER? - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-11 01:05:42.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Scott Phillips, Monica Amestoy, James Braden - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Peninsula JL - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -64 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Greenhill Krishnan Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Strike K - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NDCA
- Caselist.CitesClass[66]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,11 +1,0 @@ 1 -====The word “CRIP” masks privilege and has a history that is oppressive. Don’t hide behind academia – you abstract from lived experiences of the bodies you are talking about.==== 2 -Mark Sherry 13 Ph.D. Associate Professor of Sociology and Anthropology, at the University of Toledo, Ohio, "Crip Politics? Just...No," The Feminist Wire, November 23, 2013, GHS//MM 3 -That’s because the term “crip” has a long history – one that is 4 -AND 5 -what so many academics have, and so few disabled people actually experience. 6 -====“Crip” is rooted in exclusion and privilege. There is no justification of imposing a “crip” identity over a large group of people.==== 7 -Mark Sherry 13 Ph.D. Associate Professor of Sociology and Anthropology, at the University of Toledo, Ohio, "Crip Politics? Just...No," The Feminist Wire, November 23, 2013, GHS//MM 8 -But claiming a “crip” identity as a nondisabled person is not a sign 9 -AND 10 -the vast majority of disabled people, who do not have physical impairments. 11 -====Thus the CP text: The United States should take similar aff actions to decrease ablenormativity to guarantee the right to housing, with the exception of endorsing “crip-ing the home.”==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-22 14:06:06.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anthony Ogbuli - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Southlake Carroll JC - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -65 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Greenhill Krishnan Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Crip PIC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NSDA Districts
- Caselist.CitesClass[67]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,12 +1,0 @@ 1 -====Embracing embodiment politics in the context of disabilities prompts societal backlash and reifies the ability-disability binary ~-~-- fails to produce progressive political or societal change==== 2 -Melissa Cole 2k, Assistant Professor, St. Louis University School of Law; J.D., Columbia Law School 1993; doctoral candidate in American Studies, College of William and Mary, ARTICLE: The Mitigation Expectation and the Sutton Court's Closeting of Disabilities, Reporter: 43 How. L.J. 499, Spring, 2000 3 -Disability differs even more significantly from categories like race because "the disabled arouse in 4 -AND 5 -thus fails to produce a similar possibility of liberation for people with disabilities. 6 - 7 -====Even positive deployment of disability pride reifies us/them binaries ~-~-- causes societal scapegoating of disabled persons for the inevitability of suffering==== 8 -Mairian Scott-Hill 2, former senior research fellow at King's College London (deceased), “Policy, politics and the silencing of ‘voice’,” Policy and Politics, vol 30, no 3, 2002, p. 397-409 9 -I have argued elsewhere (Corker, 1999c, 2002) that approaches to the 10 -AND 11 -to consider the exclusionary force of one of activism’s most treasured contemporary premises. 12 -====This disad turns case because your use of binaries only serves to re-entrench the same oppressive structures that you hope to escape. Your movement is co-opted.==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-22 14:06:07.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anthony Ogbuli - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Southlake Carroll JC - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -65 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Greenhill Krishnan Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Embodiment DA - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NSDA Districts
- Caselist.CitesClass[68]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,15 +1,0 @@ 1 -====CP Text: The United States ought not engage in the right to housing and should instead aggressively enforce antidiscrimination laws.==== 2 -Peter D. Salins 98, Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs of the State University of New York, “Comment on Chester Hartman’s “The Case for a right to housing”: Housing is a right? Wrong!”, Housing Policy Debate, 9:2, 1998, ghs//BZ 3 -There is a policy alternative to a universal housing entitlement. The most persuasive of 4 -AND 5 -aside their anachronistic aspirations and unrealistic policy nostrums and supported such an effort. 6 -====Solves root cause – the problem is with how landlords perceive residents and the CP mandates remedies for discriminatory actions==== 7 -IWHRC 13, International Women’s Human Rights Clinic, “A Gendered Perspective on the Right to Housing in the United States,” City University of New York School of Law, 2013., ghs//BZ 8 -Negative stereotypes against women/women of color/single mothers permeate landlords’ views about 9 -AND 10 -it also triggers a government obligation to provide remedies and prevent further exclusion. 11 -====Enforcing discrimination law prevents unfair barriers and provides legal redress==== 12 -Yager 15, Ingrid Gould Ellen and Jessica Yager, “Race, Poverty, and Federal Rental Housing Policy,” in HUD at 50: Creating Pathways to Opportunity, https://wagner.nyu.edu/files/faculty/publications/HUD_at_50_Ellen_and_Yager.pdf, ghs//BZ 13 -In recent years, HUD’s efforts to enforce the antidiscrimination provisions of the act have 14 -AND 15 -that have deferred and derailed too many dreams” (HUD, 2015a). - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-22 20:31:58.91 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Salas, Marshall, Berdugo - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Trinity Valley BV - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -66 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Greenhill Krishnan Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -MARAPR - Antidiscrimination CP - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NSDA Districts
- Caselist.RoundClass[64]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -65 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-11 01:05:40.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Scott Phillips, Monica Amestoy, James Braden - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Peninsula JL - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,0 @@ 1 -1AC- speech zones 2 -1NC- strike k counterpublics PIC 3 -1AR- solvency advocate theory all 4 -2NR- strike k counterpublics pic 5 -2AR- all - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NDCA
- Caselist.RoundClass[65]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -66,67 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-22 14:06:04.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anthony Ogbuli - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Southlake Carroll JC - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,0 @@ 1 -1AC- ableism "crip the home" 2 -1NC- crip PIC embodiment DA util NC's DA 3 -1AR- case word pics bad 4 -2NR- crip pic 5 -2AR- case word pics bad - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NSDA Districts
- Caselist.RoundClass[66]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-22 20:31:54.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Salas, Marshall, Berdugo - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Trinity Valley BV - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,4 +1,0 @@ 1 -1AC- whole res human dignity w felon IPV and veteran contentions 2 -1NC- antidiscrim CP housing bubble DA 3 -1AR2AR- same 4 -2NR- CP DA - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NSDA Districts