Summary

• Objects (2 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[61]
  • Caselist.RoundClass[62]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[63]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[61]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-04-09 14:21:14.274
	1	+2017-04-09 14:21:14.0

Caselist.RoundClass[62]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-04-09 14:23:05.360
	1	+2017-04-09 14:23:05.0

Caselist.CitesClass[63]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,27 @@
	1	+====Public colleges and universities in the United States should not restrict constitutionally protected journalist speech except when that speech is explicitly bigoted, as per Peter Byrne’s definition.
	2	+EXTREMISTS CONSISTENTLY WRITE OPINION ARTICLES AND LETTERS IN CAMPUS NEWSPAPERS, THEIR SPEECH IS CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED BUT IT DOESN’T HAVE TO APPEAR IN DEHUMANIZING WAYS IN NEWSPAPERS ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES====
	3	+Lewy et al ‘08 (Anti Defamation League, Copyright 2008, Glen S. Lewy, National Chair, Abraham H. Foxman, National Director, Kenneth Jacobson, Deputy National Director, David Millstone, Chair, Education Committee, Ed S. Alster, Director, Education Division, Marvin Nathan, Chair, Civil Rights Committee, Deborah Lauter, National Civil Rights Director, Stacey Berkowitz, Director, Campus and Confronting Anti-Semitism Initiatives, Deborah Cohen, Assistant Director of Legal Affairs, “RESPONDING to BIGOTRY and INTERGROUP STRIFE on CAMPUS”, ADL, http://www.adl.org/assets/pdf/education-outreach/Responding-to-Bigotry-and-Intergroup-Strife-on-Campus.pdf~-~-ghs//sk)
	4	+To place an outright ban on certain speech would be unconstitutional and contrary¶ to
	5	+AND
	6	+right to criticize an article or the decisions made¶ by newspaper staff.
	7	+====It competes – they defend allowing all journalist speech, but we PIC out of things like outright racist articles and racist cartoons.
	8	+Solves the aff – the CP can establish comprehensive definitions, acquittal procedures, and student-faculty panels – key to reversing hateful ideology and empowering excluded groups====
	9	+J. Peter Byrne 91 Associate Professor, Georgetown University Law Center., “Racial Insults and Free Speech Within the University,” 79 Geo. L.J. 399 (1991), http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1577, ghs//BZ
	10	+Disciplinary rules are the least effective way that a university can enhance¶ the quality
	11	+AND
	12	+the¶ educational environment for blameless students against wanton and hurtful¶ ranting.
	13	+====Here’s a definition of bigoted speech- it’s very clear which solves their censorship/ vagueness arguments====
	14	+J. Peter Byrne 91 Associate Professor, Georgetown University Law Center., “Racial Insults and Free Speech Within the University,” 79 Geo. L.J. 399 (1991), http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1577, ghs//BZ
	15	+This article examines the constitutionality of university prohibitions of public expression that insults members of
	16	+AND
	17	+fears and prejudices rather than to respect for others and informed judgment.3
	18	+====Racist newspaper cartoons in colleges are often portrayed as isolated incidents and never results in meaningful conversations, it also undermines academic performance- TURNS their censorship arguments like Alexander because it proves that there’s no conversations sparked from racist cartoons that the CP would get rid of- ALSO TURNS civic engagement because students don’t engage if they feel disrespected and not wanted academically====
	19	+Gallagher ’15 (Dana, November 18th, writer at the College Voice, Connecticut College’s Student Newspaper, “Racist Caricature in Student Journalism”, The College Voice, http://thecollegevoice.org/2015/11/18/racist-caricature-in-student-journalism/~-~-ghs//sk)
	20	+On Oct. 23, SUNY Plattsburgh’s student-run newspaper, The Cardinal Points
	21	+AND
	22	+college experiences, we must first accept the vulnerabilities that our history entails.
	23	+====Public hate and hate speech inflicts psychological violence across multiple generations and millennia – also justifies mass oppression and primes society for genocide====
	24	+Delgado and Stefacic ’09, Richard Delgado - University Professor, Seattle University School of Law; J.D., 1974, University of California, Berkeley. Jean Stefancic – Research Professor, Seattle University School of Law; M.A., 1989, University of San Francisco. “FOUR OBSERVATIONS ABOUT HATE SPEECH.” WAKE FOREST LAW REVIEW. 2009. http://wakeforestlawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Delgado_LawReview_01.09.pdf, ghs//BZ
	25	+II. OBSERVATION NUMBER TWO: THE EVALUATION OF HARMS HAS BEEN INCOMPLETE One way
	26	+AND
	27	+at odds with the underlying rationales of a system of free expression.111

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-04-09 14:23:07.278

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+SunHee Simon

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harvard Westlake WB

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+62

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+3

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Greenhill Krishnan Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JANFEB - Journalism Hate Speech PIC V2

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+NDCA