Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[58]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[59]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[58]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-03-25 13:46:07.836
	1	+2017-03-25 13:46:07.0

Caselist.CitesClass[59]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,20 @@
	1	+====A Interpretation: The aff must defend that public colleges and universities in the United States un-restrict all constitutionally protected speech.
	2	+B Violation: They defend colleges and universities amending title 9 policy to include sexual harassment- which isn’t constitutionally protected speech
	3	+Title 9 just prohibits discrimination based on sex and requires schools to take a stance against this harassment====
	4	+Us department of education (https://ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/title-ix-rights-201104.pdf~-~-ghs//sk)
	5	+Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (“Title IX”), 20 U.
	6	+AND
	7	+must be widely distributed and available on¶ an on-going basis.
	8	+
	9	+====CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED SPEECH IS THE RIGHT TO NOT BE HINDERED BY THE GOVERNMENT WHEN EXPRESSING YOURSELF- HERE’S SOME SPECIFIC EXAMPLES====
	10	+US COURTS (http://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/what-does~-~-ghs//sk)
	11	+Freedom of speech includes the right:¶ Not to speak (specifically, the right
	12	+AND
	13	+States v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310 (1990).
	14	+====HARASSMENT IS NOT CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED SPEECH AND THESE POLICIES AREN’T AIMED AT SPEECH UNLIKE SPEECH CODES–PEOPLE HAVE TRIED TO USE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROTECT IT BECAUSE IT HASN’T WORKED====
	15	+Marcus 07, Kenneth L Marcus Lillie and Nathan Ackerman Chair in Equality and Justice in America, Baruch College¶ School of Public Affairs. "Higher Education, Harassment, and First Amendment Opportunism." Wm. and Mary Bill Rts. J. 16 (2007): 1025 RFK)
	16	+These incidents highlight a puzzling phenomenon in contemporary constitutional¶ culture. The puzzle has
	17	+AND
	18	+have been subjected to¶ frequent, intense challenge as of late.37z
	19	+====C Standards:
	20	+1 Limits + Advocacy Skills====

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-03-25 13:46:12.442

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Hertzig, Koshak

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Westwood RM

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+58

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Greenhill Krishnan Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JANFEB - T - Harassment

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Kandi King RR