| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,16 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Subaltern counterpublics currently allow undercommons discourse to take place free of whiteness so revolutionary discourse does not get coopted==== |
|
2 |
+Nancy Frasier 90 American critical theorist, feminist, and the Henry A. and Louise Loeb Professor of Political and Social Science and professor of philosophy at The New School in New York City, “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text- Duke University Press No. 25/26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/466240 . pp 66-68 |
|
3 |
+This argument gains additional support from the revisionist historiography of the public sphere, up |
|
4 |
+AND |
|
5 |
+unjust participatory privileges enjoyed by members of dominant social groups in stratified societies. |
|
6 |
+====The discourse they advocate for gets coopted–dominant codes of speech are used in the academy which excludes minority from the conversation even if there is free speech –we need a safe space for subaltern voices==== |
|
7 |
+White and Lowenthal 11, John W. White Professor of English Education, University of North Florida and Patrick R.Lowenthal Associate Professor Department of Educational Technology Boise State University Boise “Academic Discourse and Formation of an Academic Identity: Minority College students and the Hidden Curriculum”, The Review of Higher Education, Volume 34, Number 2, Winter 2011. RFK |
|
8 |
+Not only do students face new and tougher academic demands at the college level, |
|
9 |
+AND |
|
10 |
+in cultural values (Corson, 2001; Ogbu, 1987, 2004). |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+====AND- their notion of neoliberalism cannot not account for anti-blackness–black is the absence of value, white symbolizes the totality of value, their analysis fails an entire segment of the world which is the black – that means the dialogue in the world off the aff can’t resolve neoliberalism because it doesn’t account for anti-blackness which is WHY we need subaltern spaces==== |
|
13 |
+BARRETT 01 (PROF OF African American Studies U of Cal 2k1 , Lindon; “Blackness and Value”) |
|
14 |
+African Americans, in sum, remain the negative resource of valuable white Americans. |
|
15 |
+AND |
|
16 |
+boundary symbolized in terms of skin complexion as the immanent and singular issue. |