Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[52]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[52]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[52]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-01-17 19:33:37.197
	1	+2017-01-17 19:33:37.0

Caselist.CitesClass[52]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,17 @@
	1	+====CP- Public colleges and universities in the United States should not restrict constitutionally protected speech to free speech zones and create subaltern counterpublics where white students are not allowed to speak.
	2	+These spaces allow for undercommons discourse that can take place free of whiteness so revolutionary discourse does not get coopted.====
	3	+Nancy Frasier 90, American critical theorist, feminist, and the Henry A. and Louise Loeb Professor of Political and Social Science and professor of philosophy at The New School in New York City, “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text- Duke University Press No. 25/26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/466240 . pp 66-68
	4	+This argument gains additional support from the revisionist historiography of the public sphere, up
	5	+AND
	6	+unjust participatory privileges enjoyed by members of dominant social groups in stratified societies.
	7	+====The net benefit is avoiding white cooption of discourse–dominant codes of speech are used in the academy which excludes minority from the conversation even if there is free speech –we need a safe space for subaltern voices====
	8	+White and Lowenthal 11, John W. White Professor of English Education, University of North Florida and Patrick R.Lowenthal Associate Professor Department of Educational Technology Boise State University Boise “Academic Discourse and Formation of an Academic Identity: Minority College students and the Hidden Curriculum”, The Review of Higher Education, Volume 34, Number 2, Winter 2011. RFK
	9	+Not only do students face new and tougher academic demands at the college level,
	10	+AND
	11	+in cultural values (Corson, 2001; Ogbu, 1987, 2004).
	12	+
	13	+====AND- their notion of neoliberalism cannot not account for anti-blackness–black is the absence of value white sympolizes the totality of value there analysis fails an entire segment of the world which is the black – that means the dialogue in the world off the aff can’t resolve neoliberalism because it doesn’t account for anti-blackness which is WHY we need subaltern spaces====
	14	+BARRETT 01PROF OF African American Studies U of Cal 2k1 Lindon; “Blackness and Value”
	15	+African Americans, in sum, remain the negative resource of valuable white Americans.
	16	+AND
	17	+boundary symbolized in terms of skin complexion as the immanent and singular issue.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-01-17 19:33:40.559

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Elijah Smith, Rodrigo Paramo, Travis Fife

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+La Canada AZ

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+52

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Finals

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Greenhill Krishnan Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JANFEB - Subaltern Counterpublics CP

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harvard Westlake