Changes for page Greenhill Krishnan Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:35
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[50]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-01-16 02:49:09. 911 +2017-01-16 02:49:09.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[50]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,27 @@ 1 +====A Interpretation: The Aff must defend implementation of the resolution,” Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech.” by public colleges and universities in the US. 2 +Public colleges are institutions of learning that are funded by governments.==== 3 +USLegal: USLegal Site that defines legal terms “Public College Law and Legal Definition.” USLegal. RP 4 +Public college means “any institution of higher education or any technical or vocational school 5 +AND 6 +funds or property derived from a governmental source.”(42 USCS § 2000c) 7 +====B Violation: 8 +C Net Benefits: 9 +FIRST IS GROUND AND LIMITS 10 +SECOND IS DELIBERATION ~-~- Debate requires a specific point of difference in order to promote effective exchange—stasis and limits are key to engagement.==== 11 +Steinberg and Freeley 13, * David, Lecturer in Communicatio22n studies and rhetoric. Advisor to Miami Urban Debate League. Director of Debate at U Miami, Former President of CEDA. And ** Austin, attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, JD, Suffolk University, Argumentation and Debate, Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 121-4 12 +Debate is a means of settling differences, so there must be a controversy, 13 +AND 14 +particular point of difference, which will be outlined in the following discussion. 15 +====The impact outweighs—deliberative debate models impart skills vital to respond to social problems==== 16 +Christian O. Lundberg 10 Professor of Communications @ University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, “Tradition of Debate in North Carolina” in Navigating Opportunity: Policy Debate in the 21st Century By Allan D. Louden, p. 311 17 +The second major problem with the critique that identifies a naivety in articulating debate and 18 +AND 19 +with the existential challenges to democracy in an increasingly complex world. 20 +====Their method is incomplete–conscientization requires praxis, reflection AND action–cannot be purely intellectual like the aff but must give us some way to transform society==== 21 +Tristan McCowan 06, Institute of Education, University College London “Approaching the political in citizenship education: the perspectives of Paulo Freire and Bernard Crick,” Educate, VOl. 6, No. 1, 2006. RFK 22 +The concept used most commonly by Freire in relation to this liberation is conscientization. 23 +AND 24 +access to the truth, even if it is uncomplimentary to the state. 25 + 26 + 27 +====D DTD, voters are advocacy skills and education==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-16 02:49:11.178 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Calen Smith, Paras Kumar, Erik Legried - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Palo Alto BH - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +50 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Doubles - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Greenhill Krishnan Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JANFEB - T - Defend the Topic - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard Westlake