Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[38]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[38]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[38]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-11-20 04:05:42.294
	1	+2016-11-20 04:05:42.0

Caselist.CitesClass[38]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,20 @@
	1	+====Uniqueness - the Court avoids issue creation by requiring litigants to strictly adhere to the unique facts of cases====
	2	+Baird and Jacobi, 09 - *Associate Professor of Political Science at UC-Boulder AND **Professor of Law at Northwestern (Vanessa and Tonja, “HOW THE DISSENT BECOMES THE MAJORITY: USING FEDERALISM TO TRANSFORM COALITIONS IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT,” 59 Duke L.J. 183, November, lexis)
	3	+But why do Justices need to signal for cases in the future? If the
	4	+AND
	5	+Justices to persuade their previously unsympathetic colleagues to join them in their opinion.
	6	+====The plan decides the case in advance of the arguments presented from the facts of a specific controversy – this crushes the rule of law====
	7	+Colbert, 06 – professor of law at the University of Maryland (Douglas, “Coming Soon to a Court Near You - Convicting the Unrepresented at the Bail Stage: An Autopsy of a State High Court's Sua Sponte* Rejection of Indigent Defendants' Right to Counsel,” 36 Seton Hall L. Rev. 653, lexis)
	8	+Even then, an activist court's readiness to decide a question not briefed or fully
	9	+AND
	10	+be followed if sufficiently persuasive but which are not controlling.'" n249
	11	+====This destroys the sua sponte doctrine and uniquely wrecks court legitimacy====
	12	+Epstein, 98 - professor of political science and professor of law at Washington University (Lee, The Choices Justicies Make, p. 160-161)
	13	+This story suggests that a particular version of the sua sponte doctrine, namely the
	14	+AND
	15	+Court erodes its credibility and trespasses on the soul of the adversarial system.
	16	+====Loss of legitimacy prevents court from checking military, ensuring nuclear war.====
	17	+Kellman 89, prof of law @ DePaul, 1989 (Barry Kellman, prof of law @ DePaul, Dec 1989, “JUDICIAL ABDICATION OF MILITARY TORT ACCOUNTABILITY: BUT WHO IS TO GUARD THE GUARDS THEMSELVES?” 1989 Duke L.J. 1597)
	18	+In this era of thermonuclear weapons, America must uphold its historical commitment to be
	19	+AND
	20	+recognizable in a millennium ushered in under the mushroom cloud of thermonuclear holocaust.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-11-20 04:05:47.553

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Carlos Taylor

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Brentwood KR

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+38

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Greenhill Krishnan Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+NOVDEC - Sua Sponte DA

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Glenbrooks