| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,9 @@ |
|
1 |
+====A Interpretation: The affirmative must defend the reduction of qualified immunity for police officers. To clarify, they may not defend the abolishment of qualified immunity. Limit means to reduce:==== |
|
2 |
+Oxford Learner’s Dictionariesworld’s largest repository of information about the English language, Oxford Dictionaries is part of Oxford University Press (OUP), a department of the University of Oxford. A global organization, covering major languages such as English, Chinese, Arabic, Spanish, French, and Portuguese, and less widely spoken ones such as isiZulu and Malay, “Limit,” http://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/limit_2, ghs//BZ |
|
3 |
+to restrict or reduce the amount of something that you or somebody can have or use |
|
4 |
+====C Standards: |
|
5 |
+1 Limits 2 Field Context – specifically in a constitutional and legal context, limitations require restriction of the law – government debates are about restrictions and modifications on current programs not complete elimination==== |
|
6 |
+Brian Tamanaha 07William Gardiner Hammond Professor of Law, renowned jurisprudence and law and society scholar, and the author of eight books and numerous scholarly articles “A CONCISE GUIDE TO THE RULE OF LAW,” ST. JOHN’S UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, LEGAL STUDIES RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, SEPTEMBER 2007, http://content.csbs.utah.edu/~dlevin/conlaw/tamanaha-rule-of-law.pdf, ghs//BZ |
|
7 |
+The second type of legal restraint imposes restrictions on the law itself, erecting limitations |
|
8 |
+AND |
|
9 |
+unilaterally alter. These heightened hurdles enhance the efficacy of the legal limits. |