| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,10 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Following moral testimony is just contemporary thought control—we become indoctrinated to a moral system created by a institutions of power—even if we think we’re pursuing moral goodness, we become moral sheep that fund massively inefficient systems like the IMF and World Bank while millions of people fall into poverty.==== |
|
2 |
+Wasif Rizvi 2k, Harvard Kennedy School of Government, "Innate Morality vs Indoctrinated Righteousness: A Challenge of Choices for Learning Societies," http://swaraj.org/shikshantar/ls2_rizvi.pdf. |
|
3 |
+In this article, I seek to unmask these so-called institutions of learning |
|
4 |
+AND |
|
5 |
+to listen to their conscience and reject these corrupt and unjust institutions.5 |
|
6 |
+====The only way to escape is to CRITICALLY QUESTION MORAL TESTIMONY OF OTHERS—the alt is a pedagogy of inclusion and reflection rather than careless acceptance of testimony we must examine HOW we got here and reflect on our institutions to escape the yokes of control, manipulation, and indoctrination.==== |
|
7 |
+Wasif Rizvi 2k, Harvard Kennedy School of Government, "Innate Morality vs Indoctrinated Righteousness: A Challenge of Choices for Learning Societies," http://swaraj.org/shikshantar/ls2_rizvi.pdf. |
|
8 |
+In spaces like the Institute for Development Studies and Practices, in Quetta, Pakistan |
|
9 |
+AND |
|
10 |
+, manipulation and¶ indoctrination, presents a promise of reflective learning societies. |