| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,18 @@ |
|
1 |
+====1 Epistemology: The 1AC places indigenous groups as completely different from the Western, white norm. By grouping them as all related to Western thought in this way it essentialises and homogenizes them, reifying hierarchal colonialism==== |
|
2 |
+Andersen ‘09 |
|
3 |
+(Chris, Prof. PHD, Native Studies @ Alberta, “critical indigenous studies From Difference to Density” Cultural Studies Review 15 (2) p. 80-84) |
|
4 |
+In two recent articles,3 American Indian studies professor Duane Champagne challenges ‘Western’ |
|
5 |
+AND |
|
6 |
+exists outside the life and reach of contemporary nation-states’ cultural power. |
|
7 |
+====2. Paternalism: The 1AC portrays indigenous groups as incapable of finding their own methods and resistance movements and provides one, blanket solution for all groups- this recreates white saviorism==== |
|
8 |
+Gover and Walker 92 |
|
9 |
+(Kevin, Prof of Law ASU, Jana L, ESCAPING ENVIRONMENTAL PATERNALISM: ONE TRIBE'S APPROACH TO DEVELOPING A COMMERCIAL WASTE DISPOSAL PROJECT IN INDIAN COUNTRY http://faculty.virginia.edu/ejus/ESCAPE.htm) |
|
10 |
+We have been asked to address the issue of environmental racism in the context of |
|
11 |
+AND |
|
12 |
+hostility to Indian people that we experience in many Parts Of this country. |
|
13 |
+====The alternative is to reject the 1AC’s homogenization of indigenous groups and the problems they face in favor of acknowledging multiple epistemological views- this makes us aware of the density of indigenous communities==== |
|
14 |
+Anderson 9 |
|
15 |
+Chris Andersen Michif (Métis) from western Canada, associate professor in the Faculty of Native Studies @ Alberta ‘9 “critical indigenous studies From Difference to Density” Cultural Studies Review 15 (2) p. 80-84 |
|
16 |
+By way of conclusion, let me offer some thoughts on where my removal of |
|
17 |
+AND |
|
18 |
+the danger of producing a naive, substantialist and ultimately parochial Indigenous studies. |