Summary

• Objects (2 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[18]
  • Caselist.RoundClass[19]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[21]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[18]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-01-27 23:00:41.665
	1	+2017-01-27 23:00:41.0

Caselist.RoundClass[19]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-01-27 23:00:58.434
	1	+2017-01-27 23:00:58.0

Caselist.CitesClass[21]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,64 @@
	1	+====I negate the resolution. ~~**Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech~~====**
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+====Since Dictionary.com defines "any" in the resolution as "every; all," the aff must prove that all forms of speech provide benefits to people and thus none of these forms should be limited. ====
	5	+
	6	+
	7	+====I value morality because ought implies moral obligation.====
	8	+
	9	+
	10	+====All people share an intrinsic value that comes from our humanity – each person has inalienable human worth and is born with equal rights. Inequality is merely a manifestation of unjustified cognitive biases that leverages structures within societal systems to make certain groups invisible.====
	11	+Winter and Leighton 99, ~|Deborah DuNann Winter and Dana C. Leighton. Winter~|~~Psychologist that specializes in Social Psych, Counseling Psych, Historical and Contemporary Issues, Peace Psychology. Leighton: PhD graduate student in the Psychology Department at the University of Arkansas. Knowledgable in the fields of social psychology, peace psychology, and justice and intergroup responses to transgressions of justice~~ "Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology in the 21st century." Pg 4-5 ghs//VA
	12	+Finally, to recognize the operation of structural violence forces us to ask questions about
	13	+AND
	14	+local cultures, will be our most surefooted path to building lasting peace.
	15	+
	16	+
	17	+====Thus, the value criterion is promoting human equality.====
	18	+
	19	+
	20	+===Contention 1 – Hate Speech===
	21	+
	22	+
	23	+====Expanding constitutionally protected speech sanctions hate speech, since the First Amendment legitimizes hatred and justifies the right to oppressive speech. ====
	24	+Boler 04, Boler, Megan ~~Megan Boler is a Full Professor in the Department of Social Justice Education, at the Ontario Institute of Studies in Education (OISE) at the University of Toronto.~~. "All Speech Is Not Free: The Ethics of Affirmative Action Pedagogy." Counterpoints 240 (2004): 3-13, ghs//BZ
	25	+On what basis might one justify an affirmative action pedagogy? The first justifica-¶
	26	+AND
	27	+worldviews to be shattered, in itself a pro-¶ foundly emotionally charged experience
	28	+
	29	+
	30	+====Hate speech is terrible for two reasons:====
	31	+
	32	+
	33	+====First, it inflicts psychological violence across multiple generations and transmits social pathologies like racism that last for millennia ====
	34	+Delgado and Stefacic ’09, Richard Delgado - University Professor, Seattle University School of Law; J.D., 1974, University of California, Berkeley. Jean Stefancic – Research Professor, Seattle University School of Law; M.A., 1989, University of San Francisco. "FOUR OBSERVATIONS ABOUT HATE SPEECH." WAKE FOREST LAW REVIEW. 2009. http://wakeforestlawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Delgado'LawReview'01.09.pdf, ghs//BZ
	35	+II. OBSERVATION NUMBER TWO: THE EVALUATION OF HARMS HAS BEEN INCOMPLETE One way
	36	+AND
	37	+and include pain, fear, shame, anger, and despair.73
	38	+
	39	+
	40	+====Second, hate speech justifies mass oppression and leads to genocide – every instance legitimizes racism and deprives the victim of their identity====
	41	+Delgado and Stefacic ’09, Richard Delgado - University Professor, Seattle University School of Law; J.D., 1974, University of California, Berkeley. Jean Stefancic – Research Professor, Seattle University School of Law; M.A., 1989, University of San Francisco. "FOUR OBSERVATIONS ABOUT HATE SPEECH." WAKE FOREST LAW REVIEW. 2009. http://wakeforestlawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Delgado'LawReview'01.09.pdf, ghs//BZ
	42	+3. General Hate Speech With general hate speech, such as anonymously circulated flyers
	43	+AND
	44	+at odds with the underlying rationales of a system of free expression.111
	45	+
	46	+
	47	+===Contention 2 – Revenge Porn===
	48	+
	49	+
	50	+====Currently, bipartisan legislation is working to combat revenge porn on college campuses. However, the aff requires public colleges and universities not to restrict revenge porn====
	51	+Goldberg 16 Erica Goldberg ~~JD, Cardozo~~, "FREE SPEECH CONSEQUENTIALISM," Columbia Law Review Volume 116, No. 3 April 2016 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract'id=2645869, RFK
	52	+The regulation of revenge porn presents thorny First Amendment issues, even though the speech
	53	+AND
	54	+threaten to undermine strong free speech protections exceptional to America's free speech regime.
	55	+
	56	+
	57	+====Revenge porn replicates patriarchal violence against women and silences victims in educational spaces ====
	58	+Flynn et al 16, Dr Asher Flynn, Dr Nicola Henry and Dr Anastasia Powell, "More than Revenge: Addressing the Harms of Revenge Pornography," Report of the More than Revenge Roundtable Hosted by Monash University, La Trobe University and RMIT University, Monday 22 February 2016, http://www.latrobe.edu.au/''data/assets/pdf'file/0010/728794/More-than-Revenge-Final-Report-Nicola-Henry.pdf, ghs//BZ
	59	+Fighting Revenge Pornography in the United States Professor Mary Anne Franks Professor Franks’ presentation highlight
	60	+AND
	61	+the minimising and trivialising of this form of sexual violence.
	62	+
	63	+
	64	+====Because I believe hate speech and revenge porn should not be allowed to run rampant in the world of the aff, I am proud to urge a negative ballot. ====

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-01-27 23:01:00.377

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Eshita Sharmin

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Murrah AC

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+19

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Greenhill J Zhou Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JANFEB - NC - Equality

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Emory