Summary

• Objects (2 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[12]
  • Caselist.RoundClass[13]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[15]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[12]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-11-20 04:12:55.654
	1	+2016-11-20 04:12:55.0

Caselist.RoundClass[13]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-11-20 04:13:11.218
	1	+2016-11-20 04:13:11.0

Caselist.CitesClass[15]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,40 @@
	1	+====Currently the Court avoids issue creation by requiring litigants to strictly adhere to the unique facts of cases ====
	2	+Baird and Jacobi, 09 - *Associate Professor of Political Science at UC-Boulder AND **Professor of Law at Northwestern (Vanessa and Tonja, "HOW THE DISSENT BECOMES THE MAJORITY: USING FEDERALISM TO TRANSFORM COALITIONS IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT," 59 Duke L.J. 183, November, lexis)
	3	+But why do Justices need to signal for cases in the future? If the
	4	+AND
	5	+Justices to persuade their previously unsympathetic colleagues to join them in their opinion.
	6	+
	7	+
	8	+====The plan decides the case in advance of the arguments presented from the facts of a specific controversy – this crushes the rule of law====
	9	+Colbert, 06 – professor of law at the University of Maryland (Douglas, "Coming Soon to a Court Near You - Convicting the Unrepresented at the Bail Stage: An Autopsy of a State High Court's Sua Sponte* Rejection of Indigent Defendants' Right to Counsel," 36 Seton Hall L. Rev. 653, lexis)
	10	+Even then, an activist court's readiness to decide a question not briefed or fully
	11	+AND
	12	+be followed if sufficiently persuasive but which are not controlling.'" n249
	13	+
	14	+
	15	+====Ruling on grounds not present in the test case utterly destroy judicial legitimacy – they reveal the legal system as a sham====
	16	+Milani and Smith, 02 - both are Assistant Professors, Mercer University School of Law (Adam and Michael, "Playing God: A Critical Look at Sua Sponte Decisions by Appellate Courts," 69 Tenn. L. Rev. 245, Winter, lexis)
	17	+Sua sponte decisions work against such litigant and societal acceptance of courts' decisions because the
	18	+AND
	19	+screwed, that's an imposition up with which I shall not put." n211
	20	+
	21	+
	22	+====The rule of law is vital to solving disease and terrorism globally – the US is modeled====
	23	+**Greco 5** (Michael, president of the American Bar Association, Miami Daily Business Review, 12/5, lexis)
	24	+What makes the rule of law so important that it attracted such a distinguished community
	25	+AND
	26	+for an independent, nonpartisan commission to investigate our treatment of such prisoners.
	27	+
	28	+
	29	+====Disease causes extinction====
	30	+Yu 09 ~~Victoria, "Human Extinction: The Uncertainty of Our Fate," Dartmouth Journal of Undergraduate Science, May 22, http://dujs.dartmouth.edu/spring-2009/human-extinction-the-uncertainty-of-our-fate~~
	31	+In the past, humans have indeed fallen victim to viruses. Perhaps the best
	32	+AND
	33	+— which could only infect birds — into a human-viable strain.
	34	+
	35	+
	36	+====Terrorist attacks escalate – killing billions ====
	37	+**Myhrvold 14** (Nathan P ~~chief executive and founder of Intellectual Ventures and a former chief technology officer at Microsoft~~; Strategic Terrorism: A Call to Action; cco.dodlive.mil/files/2014/04/Strategic_Terrorism_corrected_II.pdf; kdf)
	38	+Technology contains no inherent moral directive—it empowers people, whatever their intent,
	39	+AND
	40	+, and bombings in major cities. Strategic objectives cannot be far behind.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-11-20 04:13:13.222

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Jeff Joseph

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+West Ranch JH

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+13

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+4

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Greenhill J Zhou Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+NOVDEC - DA - Sua Sponte

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Glenbrooks