Changes for page Grapevine PateI Neg
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 2 added, 6 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,70 +1,0 @@ 1 -I negate the resolution Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. 2 -Hate speech is protected on Public campuses, as there is virtually no restriction on detrimental speech towards others 3 -**McGough**, Michael. "Sorry, Kids, The 1St Amendment Does Protect 'Hate Speech'". latimes.com. N. p., **2015**. Web. 30 Dec. 2016. 4 -When the editor-in-chief of the student newspaper at Williams College recanted 5 -AND 6 -policies on speech have nothing to do with "legally recognized hate speech.") 7 -Value morality 8 -Standard minimizing structural violence 9 -Prefer for 2 additional reasons: 10 - 11 -1. Before evaluating other theories, we must understand structural violence and oppression in order to include everyone in any ethical theory. 12 -Winter and Leighton 99 ~|Deborah DuNann Winter and Dana C. Leighton. Winter~|~~Psychologist that specializes in Social Psych, Counseling Psych, Historical and Contemporary Issues, Peace Psychology. Leighton: PhD graduate student in the Psychology Department at the University of Arkansas. Knowledgable in the fields of social psychology, peace psychology, and ustice and intergroup responses to transgressions of justice~~ "Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology in the 21st century." Pg 4-5 ghs//VA 13 -Finally, to recognize the operation of structural violence forces us to ask questions about 14 -AND 15 -local cultures, will be our most surefooted path to building lasting peace. 16 - 17 -2. Structural violence is based in moral exclusion, which is fundamentally flawed because exclusion is not based on dessert but rather on arbitrarily perceived differences. 18 -Susan Opotow 01 ~~Susan Opotow is a social and organizational psychologist. Her work examines the intersection of conflict, justice, and identity as they give rise to moral exclusion — seeing others as outside the scope of justice and as eligible targets of discrimination, exploitation, hate, or violence. Sh e studies moral exclusion and moral inclusion in such everyday contexts as schooling, environmental and public policy conflict, and in more violent contexts, such as deadly wars and the post-war period. She has guest edited The Journal of Social Issues and Social Justice Research and co-edited Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature (MIT Press, 2003). She is associate editor of Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology and Past President of the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues~~, "Social Injustice", Peace, Conflict, and Violence: Peace Psychology for the 21st Centuryl Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2001, BE 19 -Both structural and direct violence result~~s~~ from moral justifications and rationalizations. 20 -AND 21 -oneself or one's group at the expense of others (Tajfel, 1982). 22 - 23 - 24 -CP 25 - 26 - 27 -Text: The United States ought to establish that hate speech is harmful to its targets and subsequently ban it from public colleges and Universities 28 - 29 - 30 -Banning Hate Speech only makes sense in context of how it affects others in society. 31 -**Simpson**, Robert. "Dignity, Harm, And Hate Speech." Law and Philosophy. November 01, 2013. Web. December 05, **2016**. 32 -So far as this is our situation, I believe the way forward is to 33 -AND 34 -into view until we establish that hate speech is harmful to its targets. 35 - 36 - 37 -US is behind other countries on limiting hate speech. International contracts also support it. 38 -**McConnell**, Michael. "You Cant Say That." New York Times. June 22, 2012. Web. December 05, 2016. 39 -The United States is almost alone among Western liberal democracies in not punishing what is 40 -AND 41 -That case would almost certainly have come out differently in other liberal democracies. 42 - 43 -Hate speech and actions are rampant on college campuses, anti semetic and title IX issues show. 44 -**COTJ **. "FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS ON PUBLIC COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY CAMPUSES." Serial No. 114–31. June 02, 2014. Web. December 07, 2016. 45 -According to the National Demographic Survey of American Jewish College Students conducted by researchers at 46 -AND 47 -reporting such discrimination at the least diverse schools. Great support for public education 48 - 49 - 50 -Mutually exclusive: the Aff is bound by the resolution to not restrict free speech, thus they can't perm into an advocacy that bans a particular speech. 51 - 52 -Net Benefits: 53 - 54 - 55 -Banning hate speech will lead to less tensions between racial groups 56 -Dennis **Chong**, ~~Northwestern University, Department of Political Science~~, "Free Speech and Multiculturalism in and out of the Academy," Political Psychology, Vol. 27, **2006**. 57 -The decline in tolerance of racist expression corresponds to the diffusion of multicultural ideas among 58 -AND 59 -1980s, when campuses across the country took measures to regulate hate speech. 60 - 61 -The hate speech ban on college campuses will maximize educational equality. Racist free speech denies equality of education for students of color. Jill Gordon ~~Professor of Philosophy, Colby College~~, and Markus Johnson ~~Colby College~~, "Race, Speech, and a Hostile Education Environment: What Color is Free Speech?" Journal of Social Philosophy, Vol. 34, No. 3, Fall 2003. 62 -The grievousness of being denied equality of education is magnified by the fact that courts 63 -AND 64 -, namely, the proscription of such harassment, not the toleration thereof. 65 - 66 -Speech codes are successful and protect diversity and education. 67 -Richard **Delgado** ~~Charles Inglis Thomson Professor of Law, University of Colorado~~ and David Yun ~~JD, University of Colorado~~, "The Neo-conservative Case Against HateSpeech Regulation- Lively, D'souza, Gates, Carter, and the Toughlove Crowd," 68 -Moreover, success is more possible than the toughlove crowd would like to acknowledge. 69 -AND 70 -The same may well continue to happen with the hate-speech movement. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-21 22:54:40.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -dont remember - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Prosper EH - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Semis - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Grapevine PateI Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JANFEB-Hate speech PIC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Coppell
- Caselist.CitesClass[3]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -These are all of my broken positions. If you have any questions, my email is rkp4220@gmail.com - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-24 04:37:07.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -none - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -none - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Grapevine PateI Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Contact Info - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -none
- Caselist.CitesClass[4]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,92 +1,0 @@ 1 -==Links == 2 - 3 - 4 -====Colleges have been historically rooted in white supremacy==== 5 -Harris, Leslie 2015. "The Long, Ugly History Of Racism At American Universities". New Republic. N. p.,. Web. 10 Jan. 2017. 6 -In fact, colleges and universities historically have supported hierarchies of race and other forms 7 -AND 8 -, were supporters of slavery, and some were wealthy slave owners themselves. 9 - 10 - 11 -====White supremacy is deeply entrenched in the constitution inhibiting the achievement of equality for minorities==== 12 -Marissa Jackson, 2009, Article: Neo-Colonialism, Same Old Racism: A Critical Analysis of the United States' Shift toward Colorblindness as a Tool for the Protection of the American Colonial Empire and White Supremacy, 11 Berkeley J. Afr.-Am. L. and Pol'y 156, 174-175 13 -Marshall's statements reflect a belief in the potential of American democracy to evolve. Colonialism 14 -AND 15 -is now hiding the nation's worst traits behind the shield of colorblindness. 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 -====When the arbitrary state, historically the oppressor, controls the legal means, the law is a direct source of oppression-==== 20 -ARTICLE: lessons From Malcolm X: Freedom by Any Means Necessary, 38 How. L.J. 79, 91-93 21 - 22 -When the oppressor controls the legal means, law is a direct source of oppression. A legal system may formally embrace princi- ~~*92~~ ples of justice such as the equal protection of laws, due process, and fundamental civil rights and liberties, yet these formal notions of justice, do not assure that oppression against disfavored groups will cease to exist. If legal means remain in the oppressor's hands, particularly one with a historical record for perpetuating oppression, the formal legal system may not tell the whole story of oppression. Hence, in every situation, the critical question will be: who controls the legal means? This simple question may unravel the secrets of oppression. 23 -Most systems of government have three branches all of which are involved in the law 24 -AND 25 -the economic, social, and political means of oppression can be easily harnessed 26 - 27 - 28 -====Free speech is only a right for the privileged and is a tool to silence the oppressed. The aff only perpetuates this standard. ==== 29 -Vidani, Peter. "ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH". The New Society. FEBRUARY 3, 2016. Web. 22 Jan. 2017. 30 -We, as a society, have a collective obligation to protect one another from 31 -AND 32 -our obligation to tear down the structures that allow harm to be perpetuated. 33 - 34 - 35 -==The impacts== 36 - 37 - 38 -====Unrestricted speech results in Silencing of minorities in the classroom==== 39 -Margaret E. Montoya, Professor of Law, University of New Mexico School of Law, A.B. 1972, San Diego State University; J.D. 1978 Harvard Law School., 2009, ARTICLE:SILENCE AND SILENCING: THEIR CENTRIPETAL AND CENTRIFUGAL FORCES IN LEGAL COMMUNICATION, PEDAGOGY AND DISCOURSE, 33 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 263, 299-300 40 -Freire argued that schools supported the status quo by ignoring racism, sexism, the 41 -AND 42 --censoring, resulting in centripetal, or power-centering, effects. 43 - 44 - 45 -====By protecting speech, the aff glorifies the expression of racism and sexism. This speech justifies atrocities like oppression and murder==== 46 -Vidani, Peter. "ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH". The New Society. FEBRUARY 3, 2016. Web. 22 Jan. 2017. 47 -The common ground that these rulings stand on is the idea that contemporary community standards 48 -AND 49 -And by that, we are implicit in the crimes associated with them. 50 - 51 - 52 -====Racism is the root cause of violence which they perpetuate==== 53 -Foucault '76 54 -~~Michel, Society Must be Defended: Lectures at the College de France, 1975-1976, p. 254-257 Trans. David Macey~~ 55 -What in fact is racism? It is primarily a way of introducing a break 56 -AND 57 -second half of the nineteenth century), except by activating the theme of racism 58 - 59 - 60 -==The alt== 61 - 62 - 63 -===Text: Public Colleges and Universities ought to restrict the speech for the oppressor and offer deference to the oppressed=== 64 - 65 - 66 -====The constitution doesn't require neutrality in matters of equality, it requires to government to promote equality—we need an equality based free speech system in order to achieve equality==== 67 -Shannon Gilreath, 2009, ARTICLE AND ESSAY: "TELL YOUR FAGGOT FRIEND HE OWES ME $ 500 FOR MY BROKEN HAND": THOUGHTS ON A SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY THEORY OF FREE SPEECH*, * The title of this Article is taken from the actual words of the murderer of a young Gay man, Sean Kennedy, spoken to one of Kennedy's friends, only minutes after the murder. For a fuller description of the crime, see infra notes 124-25 and accompanying text. , 44 Wake Forest L. Rev. 557, 607-611 68 -In fact, no speech case, before Beauharnais or since, has explicitly invoked 69 -AND 70 -and context. The next section of this Article takes up this important discussion 71 - 72 - 73 -====There must be reasonable regulation anti-identity and anti-equality speech in order to ever achieve equality==== 74 -Shannon Gilreath, 2009, ARTICLE AND ESSAY: "TELL YOUR FAGGOT FRIEND HE OWES ME $ 500 FOR MY BROKEN HAND": THOUGHTS ON A SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY THEORY OF FREE SPEECH*, * The title of this Article is taken from the actual words of the murderer of a young Gay man, Sean Kennedy, spoken to one of Kennedy's friends, only minutes after the murder. For a fuller description of the crime, see infra notes 124-25 and accompanying text. , 44 Wake Forest L. Rev. 557, 607-611 75 - 76 - 77 -====It is because of this personal nature of my stake in the debate about speech and equality that I am keenly aware of Professor Michael Curtis's warning: "thoughtful arguments for revision ~~of the free speech norm~~ would recognize that departures from ~~the status quo~~ involve serious dangers and that exceptions need to be confined by tough, narrowly drawn, and very careful rules." I could not agree more. Because the speech authoritarians have won, however, it is hard to believe that the absolutist view of free speech they advocate is wrong or that thoughtful departures from the absolutist norm are possible. But a free speech system that allows reasonable regulation of anti-identity, anti-equality speech aimed at people who face systematic and systemic powerlessness and subordination in contravention of their constitutionally guaranteed (and compelling) interest in equality is exactly this sort of system: one in which both a commitment to free speech and a commitment to equality are respected. When the victims of anti-identity speech can finally assert human rights against devastating, victimizing speech, a rational understanding of the free speech norm will emerge, and Gay youth - thereby Gay women and men - will finally have a shot at a dignified place in their country. We will be closer to an America where everyone matters - not just the powerful. Equality may mean something after all. 78 - 79 -Silencing the silencer is the only way to give a voice to people of color==== 80 -Alice K. Ma 81 -Alice K. Ma, A.B. 1989, Harvard and Radcliffe Colleges; J.D. candidate 1995, Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley. ,1995, COMMENT: Campus Hate Speech Codes: Affirmative Action in the Allocation of Speech Rights, 83 Calif. L. Rev. 693, 732 82 - 83 -Hate speech in colleges and universities is especially disheartening because campus communities are among 84 -AND 85 -and all walks of life. Most important, all must participate equally. 86 - 87 - 88 -====The aff solvency of counterspeech will only exacerbate the problem. We advocate for censorship for the sake of good, eliminating harmful ideas and addressing the root cause. The aff only ignores the root. ==== 89 -Vidani, Peter. "ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH". The New Society. FEBRUARY 3, 2016. Web. 22 Jan. 2017. 90 -As previously detailed, the unrestricted right to free speech will ultimately give safe harbor 91 -AND 92 -, if we are to prevent harm, we must advocate for censorship. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-27 23:13:53.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Jaden Lessnick - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Kinkaid JY - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Grapevine PateI Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JANFEB-White Supremacy K - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Emory
- Caselist.RoundClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-21 22:54:38.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -dont remember - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Prosper EH - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Semis - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Coppell
- Caselist.RoundClass[3]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-24 04:37:05.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -none - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -none - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -none
- Caselist.RoundClass[4]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-27 23:13:51.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Jaden Lessnick - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Kinkaid JY - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Emory
- Caselist.CitesClass[0]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,82 @@ 1 +I negate the resolution Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. 2 +Definitions: 3 +To restrict is to confine or to place restrictions upon ~~Merriam-Webster~~ 4 +Protected Speech 5 +Speech http://www.**uscourts.gov**/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/what-does 6 +All speech is considered constitutionally protected unless it falls within several limited exceptions. The 7 +AND 8 +is always a matter of context and the specific facts of the situation. 9 +**and ** 10 + 11 + 12 +====Hate speech is protected on Public campuses, as there is virtually no restriction on detrimental speech towards others==== 13 +**McGough**, Michael. "Sorry, Kids, The 1St Amendment Does Protect 'Hate Speech'". latimes.com. N. p., **2015**. Web. 30 Dec. 2016. 14 +When the editor-in-chief of the student newspaper at Williams College recanted 15 +AND 16 +policies on speech have nothing to do with “legally recognized hate speech.”) 17 +value morality 18 +**criterion is minimizing structural violence**. 19 +Prefer for 2 additional reasons: 20 + 21 + 22 +====1. Before evaluating other theories, we must understand structural violence and oppression in order to include everyone in any ethical theory. ==== 23 +Winter and Leighton 99 ~|Deborah DuNann Winter and Dana C. Leighton. Winter~|~~Psychologist that specializes in Social Psych, Counseling Psych, Historical and Contemporary Issues, Peace Psychology. Leighton: PhD graduate student in the Psychology Department at the University of Arkansas. Knowledgable in the fields of social psychology, peace psychology, and ustice and intergroup responses to transgressions of justice~~ "Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology in the 21st century." Pg 4-5 ghs//VA 24 +Finally, to recognize the operation of structural violence forces us to ask questions about 25 +AND 26 +local cultures, will be our most surefooted path to building lasting peace. 27 + 28 + 29 +====2. Structural violence is based in moral exclusion, which is fundamentally flawed because exclusion is not based on dessert but rather on arbitrarily perceived differences.==== 30 +Susan Opotow 01 ~~Susan Opotow is a social and organizational psychologist. Her work examines the intersection of conflict, justice, and identity as they give rise to moral exclusion — seeing others as outside the scope of justice and as eligible targets of discrimination, exploitation, hate, or violence. Sh e studies moral exclusion and moral inclusion in such everyday contexts as schooling, environmental and public policy conflict, and in more violent contexts, such as deadly wars and the post-war period. She has guest edited The Journal of Social Issues and Social Justice Research and co-edited Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature (MIT Press, 2003). She is associate editor of Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology and Past President of the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues~~, "Social Injustice", Peace, Conflict, and Violence: Peace Psychology for the 21st Centuryl Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2001, BE 31 +Both structural and direct violence result~~s~~ from moral justifications and rationalizations. 32 +AND 33 +oneself or one's group at the expense of others (Tajfel, 1982). 34 + 35 + 36 +==CP Text: The United States ought to establish that hate speech is harmful to its targets and subsequently ban it from public colleges and Universities== 37 + 38 + 39 +====Banning Hate Speech only makes sense in context of how it affects others in society. ==== 40 +**Simpson**, Robert. "Dignity, Harm, And Hate Speech." Law and Philosophy. November 01, 2013. Web. December 05, **2016**. 41 +So far as this is our situation, I believe the way forward is to 42 +AND 43 +into view until we establish that hate speech is harmful to its targets. 44 + 45 + 46 +====US is behind other countries on limiting hate speech. International contracts also support it.==== 47 +**McConnell**, Michael. "You Cant Say That." New York Times. June 22, 2012. Web. December 05, 2016. 48 +The United States is almost alone among Western liberal democracies in not punishing what is 49 +AND 50 +That case would almost certainly have come out differently in other liberal democracies. 51 + 52 + 53 +====Hate speech and actions are rampant on college campuses, anti semetic and title IX issues show. ==== 54 +**COTJ **. "FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS ON PUBLIC COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY CAMPUSES." Serial No. 114–31. June 02, 2014. Web. December 07, 2016. 55 +According to the National Demographic Survey of American Jewish College Students conducted by researchers at 56 +AND 57 +reporting such discrimination at the least diverse schools. Great support for public education 58 + 59 + 60 +===Mutually exclusive: the Aff is bound by the resolution to not restrict free speech, thus they can't perm into an advocacy that bans a particular speech. === 61 + 62 + 63 +**===Net Benefits: ===** 64 + 65 + 66 +**====Banning hate speech will lead to less tensions between racial groups====** 67 +Dennis **Chong**, ~~Northwestern University, Department of Political Science~~, "Free Speech and Multiculturalism in and out of the Academy," Political Psychology, Vol. 27, **2006**. 68 +The decline in tolerance of racist expression corresponds to the diffusion of multicultural ideas among 69 +AND 70 +1980s, when campuses across the country took measures to regulate hate speech. 71 + 72 + 73 +====The hate speech ban on college campuses will maximize educational equality. Racist free speech denies equality of education for students of color. Jill Gordon ~~Professor of Philosophy, Colby College~~, and Markus Johnson ~~Colby College~~, "Race, Speech, and a Hostile Education Environment: What Color is Free Speech?" Journal of Social Philosophy, Vol. 34, No. 3, Fall 2003. ==== 74 +The grievousness of being denied equality of education is magnified by the fact that courts 75 +AND 76 +, namely, the proscription of such harassment, not the toleration thereof. 77 + 78 +====Speech codes are successful and protect diversity and education. ==== 79 +Richard **Delgado** ~~Charles Inglis Thomson Professor of Law, University of Colorado~~ and David Yun ~~JD, University of Colorado~~, "The Neo-conservative Case Against HateSpeech Regulation- Lively, D'souza, Gates, Carter, and the Toughlove Crowd," 80 +Moreover, success is more possible than the toughlove crowd would like to acknowledge. 81 +AND 82 +The same may well continue to happen with the hate-speech movement. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-21 05:14:35.428 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +dont remember - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Prosper EH - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Semis - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Grapevine PateI Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hate Speech PIC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Coppell
- Caselist.RoundClass[0]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-21 05:14:33.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +dont remember - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Prosper EH - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Semis - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,2 @@ 1 +AC stop art censorship 2 +NC hate speech PIC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Coppell