| ... |
... |
@@ -1,82
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-I negate the resolution Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. |
| 2 |
|
-Definitions: |
| 3 |
|
-To restrict is to confine or to place restrictions upon ~~Merriam-Webster~~ |
| 4 |
|
-Protected Speech |
| 5 |
|
-Speech http://www.**uscourts.gov**/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/what-does |
| 6 |
|
-All speech is considered constitutionally protected unless it falls within several limited exceptions. The |
| 7 |
|
-AND |
| 8 |
|
-is always a matter of context and the specific facts of the situation. |
| 9 |
|
-**and ** |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
- |
| 12 |
|
-====Hate speech is protected on Public campuses, as there is virtually no restriction on detrimental speech towards others==== |
| 13 |
|
-**McGough**, Michael. "Sorry, Kids, The 1St Amendment Does Protect 'Hate Speech'". latimes.com. N. p., **2015**. Web. 30 Dec. 2016. |
| 14 |
|
-When the editor-in-chief of the student newspaper at Williams College recanted |
| 15 |
|
-AND |
| 16 |
|
-policies on speech have nothing to do with “legally recognized hate speech.”) |
| 17 |
|
-value morality |
| 18 |
|
-**criterion is minimizing structural violence**. |
| 19 |
|
-Prefer for 2 additional reasons: |
| 20 |
|
- |
| 21 |
|
- |
| 22 |
|
-====1. Before evaluating other theories, we must understand structural violence and oppression in order to include everyone in any ethical theory. ==== |
| 23 |
|
-Winter and Leighton 99 ~|Deborah DuNann Winter and Dana C. Leighton. Winter~|~~Psychologist that specializes in Social Psych, Counseling Psych, Historical and Contemporary Issues, Peace Psychology. Leighton: PhD graduate student in the Psychology Department at the University of Arkansas. Knowledgable in the fields of social psychology, peace psychology, and ustice and intergroup responses to transgressions of justice~~ "Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology in the 21st century." Pg 4-5 ghs//VA |
| 24 |
|
-Finally, to recognize the operation of structural violence forces us to ask questions about |
| 25 |
|
-AND |
| 26 |
|
-local cultures, will be our most surefooted path to building lasting peace. |
| 27 |
|
- |
| 28 |
|
- |
| 29 |
|
-====2. Structural violence is based in moral exclusion, which is fundamentally flawed because exclusion is not based on dessert but rather on arbitrarily perceived differences.==== |
| 30 |
|
-Susan Opotow 01 ~~Susan Opotow is a social and organizational psychologist. Her work examines the intersection of conflict, justice, and identity as they give rise to moral exclusion — seeing others as outside the scope of justice and as eligible targets of discrimination, exploitation, hate, or violence. Sh e studies moral exclusion and moral inclusion in such everyday contexts as schooling, environmental and public policy conflict, and in more violent contexts, such as deadly wars and the post-war period. She has guest edited The Journal of Social Issues and Social Justice Research and co-edited Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature (MIT Press, 2003). She is associate editor of Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology and Past President of the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues~~, "Social Injustice", Peace, Conflict, and Violence: Peace Psychology for the 21st Centuryl Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2001, BE |
| 31 |
|
-Both structural and direct violence result~~s~~ from moral justifications and rationalizations. |
| 32 |
|
-AND |
| 33 |
|
-oneself or one's group at the expense of others (Tajfel, 1982). |
| 34 |
|
- |
| 35 |
|
- |
| 36 |
|
-==CP Text: The United States ought to establish that hate speech is harmful to its targets and subsequently ban it from public colleges and Universities== |
| 37 |
|
- |
| 38 |
|
- |
| 39 |
|
-====Banning Hate Speech only makes sense in context of how it affects others in society. ==== |
| 40 |
|
-**Simpson**, Robert. "Dignity, Harm, And Hate Speech." Law and Philosophy. November 01, 2013. Web. December 05, **2016**. |
| 41 |
|
-So far as this is our situation, I believe the way forward is to |
| 42 |
|
-AND |
| 43 |
|
-into view until we establish that hate speech is harmful to its targets. |
| 44 |
|
- |
| 45 |
|
- |
| 46 |
|
-====US is behind other countries on limiting hate speech. International contracts also support it.==== |
| 47 |
|
-**McConnell**, Michael. "You Cant Say That." New York Times. June 22, 2012. Web. December 05, 2016. |
| 48 |
|
-The United States is almost alone among Western liberal democracies in not punishing what is |
| 49 |
|
-AND |
| 50 |
|
-That case would almost certainly have come out differently in other liberal democracies. |
| 51 |
|
- |
| 52 |
|
- |
| 53 |
|
-====Hate speech and actions are rampant on college campuses, anti semetic and title IX issues show. ==== |
| 54 |
|
-**COTJ **. "FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS ON PUBLIC COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY CAMPUSES." Serial No. 114–31. June 02, 2014. Web. December 07, 2016. |
| 55 |
|
-According to the National Demographic Survey of American Jewish College Students conducted by researchers at |
| 56 |
|
-AND |
| 57 |
|
-reporting such discrimination at the least diverse schools. Great support for public education |
| 58 |
|
- |
| 59 |
|
- |
| 60 |
|
-===Mutually exclusive: the Aff is bound by the resolution to not restrict free speech, thus they can't perm into an advocacy that bans a particular speech. === |
| 61 |
|
- |
| 62 |
|
- |
| 63 |
|
-**===Net Benefits: ===** |
| 64 |
|
- |
| 65 |
|
- |
| 66 |
|
-**====Banning hate speech will lead to less tensions between racial groups====** |
| 67 |
|
-Dennis **Chong**, ~~Northwestern University, Department of Political Science~~, "Free Speech and Multiculturalism in and out of the Academy," Political Psychology, Vol. 27, **2006**. |
| 68 |
|
-The decline in tolerance of racist expression corresponds to the diffusion of multicultural ideas among |
| 69 |
|
-AND |
| 70 |
|
-1980s, when campuses across the country took measures to regulate hate speech. |
| 71 |
|
- |
| 72 |
|
- |
| 73 |
|
-====The hate speech ban on college campuses will maximize educational equality. Racist free speech denies equality of education for students of color. Jill Gordon ~~Professor of Philosophy, Colby College~~, and Markus Johnson ~~Colby College~~, "Race, Speech, and a Hostile Education Environment: What Color is Free Speech?" Journal of Social Philosophy, Vol. 34, No. 3, Fall 2003. ==== |
| 74 |
|
-The grievousness of being denied equality of education is magnified by the fact that courts |
| 75 |
|
-AND |
| 76 |
|
-, namely, the proscription of such harassment, not the toleration thereof. |
| 77 |
|
- |
| 78 |
|
-====Speech codes are successful and protect diversity and education. ==== |
| 79 |
|
-Richard **Delgado** ~~Charles Inglis Thomson Professor of Law, University of Colorado~~ and David Yun ~~JD, University of Colorado~~, "The Neo-conservative Case Against HateSpeech Regulation- Lively, D'souza, Gates, Carter, and the Toughlove Crowd," |
| 80 |
|
-Moreover, success is more possible than the toughlove crowd would like to acknowledge. |
| 81 |
|
-AND |
| 82 |
|
-The same may well continue to happen with the hate-speech movement. |