| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,70 @@ |
|
1 |
+I negate the resolution Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. |
|
2 |
+Hate speech is protected on Public campuses, as there is virtually no restriction on detrimental speech towards others |
|
3 |
+**McGough**, Michael. "Sorry, Kids, The 1St Amendment Does Protect 'Hate Speech'". latimes.com. N. p., **2015**. Web. 30 Dec. 2016. |
|
4 |
+When the editor-in-chief of the student newspaper at Williams College recanted |
|
5 |
+AND |
|
6 |
+policies on speech have nothing to do with "legally recognized hate speech.") |
|
7 |
+Value morality |
|
8 |
+Standard minimizing structural violence |
|
9 |
+Prefer for 2 additional reasons: |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+1. Before evaluating other theories, we must understand structural violence and oppression in order to include everyone in any ethical theory. |
|
12 |
+Winter and Leighton 99 ~|Deborah DuNann Winter and Dana C. Leighton. Winter~|~~Psychologist that specializes in Social Psych, Counseling Psych, Historical and Contemporary Issues, Peace Psychology. Leighton: PhD graduate student in the Psychology Department at the University of Arkansas. Knowledgable in the fields of social psychology, peace psychology, and ustice and intergroup responses to transgressions of justice~~ "Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology in the 21st century." Pg 4-5 ghs//VA |
|
13 |
+Finally, to recognize the operation of structural violence forces us to ask questions about |
|
14 |
+AND |
|
15 |
+local cultures, will be our most surefooted path to building lasting peace. |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+2. Structural violence is based in moral exclusion, which is fundamentally flawed because exclusion is not based on dessert but rather on arbitrarily perceived differences. |
|
18 |
+Susan Opotow 01 ~~Susan Opotow is a social and organizational psychologist. Her work examines the intersection of conflict, justice, and identity as they give rise to moral exclusion — seeing others as outside the scope of justice and as eligible targets of discrimination, exploitation, hate, or violence. Sh e studies moral exclusion and moral inclusion in such everyday contexts as schooling, environmental and public policy conflict, and in more violent contexts, such as deadly wars and the post-war period. She has guest edited The Journal of Social Issues and Social Justice Research and co-edited Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature (MIT Press, 2003). She is associate editor of Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology and Past President of the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues~~, "Social Injustice", Peace, Conflict, and Violence: Peace Psychology for the 21st Centuryl Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2001, BE |
|
19 |
+Both structural and direct violence result~~s~~ from moral justifications and rationalizations. |
|
20 |
+AND |
|
21 |
+oneself or one's group at the expense of others (Tajfel, 1982). |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+ |
|
24 |
+CP |
|
25 |
+ |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+Text: The United States ought to establish that hate speech is harmful to its targets and subsequently ban it from public colleges and Universities |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+ |
|
30 |
+Banning Hate Speech only makes sense in context of how it affects others in society. |
|
31 |
+**Simpson**, Robert. "Dignity, Harm, And Hate Speech." Law and Philosophy. November 01, 2013. Web. December 05, **2016**. |
|
32 |
+So far as this is our situation, I believe the way forward is to |
|
33 |
+AND |
|
34 |
+into view until we establish that hate speech is harmful to its targets. |
|
35 |
+ |
|
36 |
+ |
|
37 |
+US is behind other countries on limiting hate speech. International contracts also support it. |
|
38 |
+**McConnell**, Michael. "You Cant Say That." New York Times. June 22, 2012. Web. December 05, 2016. |
|
39 |
+The United States is almost alone among Western liberal democracies in not punishing what is |
|
40 |
+AND |
|
41 |
+That case would almost certainly have come out differently in other liberal democracies. |
|
42 |
+ |
|
43 |
+Hate speech and actions are rampant on college campuses, anti semetic and title IX issues show. |
|
44 |
+**COTJ **. "FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS ON PUBLIC COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY CAMPUSES." Serial No. 114–31. June 02, 2014. Web. December 07, 2016. |
|
45 |
+According to the National Demographic Survey of American Jewish College Students conducted by researchers at |
|
46 |
+AND |
|
47 |
+reporting such discrimination at the least diverse schools. Great support for public education |
|
48 |
+ |
|
49 |
+ |
|
50 |
+Mutually exclusive: the Aff is bound by the resolution to not restrict free speech, thus they can't perm into an advocacy that bans a particular speech. |
|
51 |
+ |
|
52 |
+Net Benefits: |
|
53 |
+ |
|
54 |
+ |
|
55 |
+Banning hate speech will lead to less tensions between racial groups |
|
56 |
+Dennis **Chong**, ~~Northwestern University, Department of Political Science~~, "Free Speech and Multiculturalism in and out of the Academy," Political Psychology, Vol. 27, **2006**. |
|
57 |
+The decline in tolerance of racist expression corresponds to the diffusion of multicultural ideas among |
|
58 |
+AND |
|
59 |
+1980s, when campuses across the country took measures to regulate hate speech. |
|
60 |
+ |
|
61 |
+The hate speech ban on college campuses will maximize educational equality. Racist free speech denies equality of education for students of color. Jill Gordon ~~Professor of Philosophy, Colby College~~, and Markus Johnson ~~Colby College~~, "Race, Speech, and a Hostile Education Environment: What Color is Free Speech?" Journal of Social Philosophy, Vol. 34, No. 3, Fall 2003. |
|
62 |
+The grievousness of being denied equality of education is magnified by the fact that courts |
|
63 |
+AND |
|
64 |
+, namely, the proscription of such harassment, not the toleration thereof. |
|
65 |
+ |
|
66 |
+Speech codes are successful and protect diversity and education. |
|
67 |
+Richard **Delgado** ~~Charles Inglis Thomson Professor of Law, University of Colorado~~ and David Yun ~~JD, University of Colorado~~, "The Neo-conservative Case Against HateSpeech Regulation- Lively, D'souza, Gates, Carter, and the Toughlove Crowd," |
|
68 |
+Moreover, success is more possible than the toughlove crowd would like to acknowledge. |
|
69 |
+AND |
|
70 |
+The same may well continue to happen with the hate-speech movement. |